RE: Philosophy of Life
Are you fooling yourself or fooling us? You have personally said various things to me and made comments that really hurt me personally. It's really a shame that you call yourself an expert on AI and try to prove your posts wrong. I think you have a problem in your head. That's why you can't accept your AI writings. It is really a shame that you are claiming that the results of four detectors are false. It has been difficult for us to catch you because you know more about it. But don't forget you must pay for your mistakes. There is time to correct yourself. No major accidents have happened yet. Admit mistakes and clean yourself up. Do not magnify any subject for no reason.
You have said some nonsense on my behalf in past comments and still I have remained silent and said nothing to you. The biggest issue is whether you do this or not, there are issues with your post showing up in different tools. It's not just me proved it our admin kindly proved it here you have no other option to say.
What the hell... Have you ever heard of language diction or personal note? Hard to imitate for an AI. Generally abundant in Waqar's texts.
What might help: don't run the English text through the checker tool, but transcribe back into the authors' native language. Then the influence factor of a translator is omitted. And read a text aloud, pay attention to how it feels and sounds: after a while of practice you will recognize an AI-generated text by its sound, by certain turns of phrase. By the sentence structure. It is always correct, but never creative!
If you are not ready to really delve into it, you will only have diary posts with descriptions of toothbrushing routines, which you will undoubtedly recognize as "human generated".
Let him be. He’s just angry and nothing else. We should leave it to the admins to decide.
Cc: @ripon0630 and @msharif.
Some people have a habit of needlessly creating conflicts with others while strongly believing that only their opinions are correct, and everyone else is wrong. Even when presented with facts and logic during communication, they still refuse to listen. 🙂
https://steemit.com/hive-185836/@silviadiez/accused-of-plagiarism-by-mostofajaman
https://steemit.com/hive-185538/@silviadiez/color-palette-or-red-a-field-full-of-poppies
May be you want to have a look on this...:
https://steemit.com/hive-107855/@weisser-rabe/torch-letter-given-the-occasion-brandbrief-aus-gegebenem-anlass
For your special interest ;-))
Calm down, my friend. 😄
Check out this link below.
https://steemit.com/hive-170554/@waqarahmadshah/ryjnll
And what is this behaviour?
Cc:@ripon0630 and @msharif. Please respond.
https://steemit.com/hive-170554/@waqarahmadshah/ryjnll
Check this post with four AI identifiers and then you speak.This stupidity of yours can cost you a lot. I've been talking to you politely so far but you've been very rude to me.
I don't want to talk to you anymore about this matter which our admin msharif. brother and ripon0630 brother will talk about.
Listen, brother. First of all, I was not being rude to you; I was simply stating my case. Secondly, it would be better if you let your admins decide. Infact one of them already has.
PS: You are simply escalating the situation.
I haven’t said anything abusive to you. If I did, show me. Why are you upset when the matter has already been resolved by your admin, @msharif?
PS: I’m not an expert on AI. What I meant was that I know of many cases of AI victims on Steemit that perhaps you don’t know about. That’s how I came to know about certain inaccuracies of these tools.
Cc: @ripon0630
@mostofajaman, do you have any knowledge about percentages? Were you so blind that you couldn't see the clear statement that 86% of it is human-written and yet you still believe this post was generated by AI? Do you even know the meaning of the red and yellow lines? Are you aware of the differences between "likely," "possibly," and "highly" AI-generated?
what's it ?
When you do this to 86% of human-written content, these things are bound to happen, my friend.
I just got emotional and wrote it in a flow. However, I apologize to you.
Why are you talking like a blind man, have you not seen them? 86% more ? You got it wrong. Will think deeply about these things in future and stay away from this AI . Thanks
In case you skipped this one. check out the below link.
https://steemit.com/hive-170554/@waqarahmadshah/ryjnll
PS: Let the admins decide. 🙂
Cc: @ripon0630 and @msharif.
ok 👍
Brother, you could have said this "ok" earlier instead of getting angry. Sometimes, it’s important to patiently consider another person’s point of view.
PS: I want to apologize again for any hurtful words I may have written in the heat of the moment. God bless you. 🙂
Regarding the 86% percentage that I was talking about, here is a zoomed-in picture for you in case you didn’t see it. It says that “Winston has detected the text as 86% human.”
As far as your 92.62% fake reading of my last few paragraphs is concerned, here is the link below in which you can see my response. If you scan so little text, you’ll always get faulty results, and I proved it. Just check out the link below.
https://steemit.com/hive-170554/@waqarahmadshah/ryjnll
You could’ve avoided all this trouble and embarrassment if you’d listened to me on Discord. Anyhow, what had to happen has happened. I got a positive response from the admins @ripon0630 and @msharif and I’ve no hard feelings for any of you.
And for all that has happened, if I have hurt anyone’s feelings, then I'm sorry for that again. But as I've said before, I was simply presenting my case to you and trying to explain that you should not rely 100% on detectors because they can give you shocking results.
PS: Please do reply to this comment so that I can close this chapter and consider it the end of the discussion. I hope that now your response will be positive. 🙂