RE: Curation Report, Team #4 / Week #4. October
I am grateful that you chose my post @deepak94. However, I have a question that I would like to ask the entire team, especially @adeljose who created this post.
There are only a few spots that feature the best posts of the week, and these people are then supported by the curators for their quality posts. In your report this week, you included several people whose posts have expired (older than seven days). It would be really helpful if you guys would check twice before making a report so that someone who needs support can receive it.
Having these reports is very important in terms of providing support to individuals who have worked hard and produced quality content. As a result, if the vote can't be given because the post is older than 7 days, then the vote that could have been given goes to waste.
| Username | Post Link | Post Age |
|---|---|---|
| @enveng | Post Link | 6 Days 18 Hours |
| @irawandedy | Post Link | 9 Days |
| @oneidaa | Post Link | 8 Days |
Thus, out of five spots, you have included three posts that have either expired or are about to expire. To make the selection process more effective, I would suggest that the team improve it.
This is not a rant, but rather a suggestion from a Steemian who wishes to see all Steemians succeed.
Greetings friend @cryptogecko
It is important to let you know that we value the quality of the publications visited by each one of us, therefore, there will always be publications with 6 or 7 days of validity within any selected Top. To do this, the SC01 curator looks for an active publication from the user to give it the corresponding vote "if approved". The regularity of the user's publication will facilitate having more options to receive the vote.
I appreciate your visit and observation. We are at your disposal for any other concern.
Vote will be given to the selected authors' most recent post, thus it's always ideal for authors to consistently produce high-quality posts. In the event that the nominated post has expired, SC01 will vote the authors' active post.
Very less likely this happens
It has been shown through comments, which is responsible for reviewing other publications of the same user
https://steemit.com/hive-166405/@steemcurator01/rjfuwh