Transaction Replacement Attack And It's Mode Of Operation On The Blockchain Network

Source

INTRODUCTION

A transaction replacement attack is a type of attack on blockchain networks where a message that has been broadcasted before is replaced with a new one before it is confirmed and added to the blockchain. This can be done in different ways. This attacks takes advantage of the time gap between when a transaction is broadcasted and when it is confirmed. There by giving attackers the chance to alter, delay, or manipulate transactions, for their benefit. This type of attack undermines the reality and integrity of the blockchain, because users feel that when a transaction has been made it can’t be altered.

In blockchain networks like Bitcoin, this replacement attacks takes the form of a double-spending attack, where a user uses the same coin for two different transactions. Other forms of replacement attacks include front-running attacks,here attackers replace a transaction with one that benefits them.

These attacks pose serious threat to the security and integrity of the blockchain network, most especially in decentralized networks where there is no central authority to solve issues related to transaction.

• MEMPOOL MANIPULATION AND TRANSACTION REPLACEMENT:

The mempool is a key part of the transaction replacement attack mechanism. When a transaction is made on a blockchain, it is first of all sent to the mempool, for it to be confirmed by miners or validators.

Before the transaction gets confirmed, it not yet part of the blockchain and it can be replaced easily. So when this transaction gets replaced as it waits in the Mempool, then we can say that a mempool manipulation has occured

This type of replacement is common in blockchain networks like bitcoin, because it allows for Replace-by-Fee (RBF) transactions. In these networks, if a user submits a new transaction with a higher fee but the same input as a previous unconfirmed transaction, the original transaction can be replaced by the new one.

• DOUBLE-SPENDING ATTACKS THROUGH TRANSACTION REPLACEMENT :

This is one of the most significant consequences of transaction replacement attack. Double-spending occurs when an attacker uses the same coins for two different transactions. This undermines the integrity of the blockchain because, attackers use this to defraud legitimate user.

Transaction replacement allows attackers to broadcast a legitimate transaction to an individual, then creating another transaction to replace the previous one, so that their funds can be returned to them.

Source

The is especially risky for merchants and service providers who accept cryptocurrency payments, as transactions can be replaced, easily when an attacker creates a new transaction, and funds will get refunded.

• FRONT-RUNNING AND PRIORITY GAS AUCTIONS:

Front-running is another form of transaction replacement attack that occurs in blockchain networks like Ethereum. This type of attack occurs when an attacker replaces a transaction with a new one before it get confirmed, this transaction will then be processed before the original transaction because of high gas fee.

This attack is very harmful especially in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, because timing is crucial in executing profitable trades or gaining access to liquidity

For example, a user might want to purchase a token for a particular amount on the blockchain network, when the attacker sees this , he will now create another transaction to buy that token before the legitimate user. As a result the user might end up buying the token for an outrageous amount, or even ending up not buying it at all.

• MITIGATION AND PREVENTION STRATEGIES:

In other to prevent transaction replacement attack from occurring, developers have introduced several strategies. One of those strategies is the act of increasing the number of confirmations needed for a transaction to be considered valid.

Another strategy is the use of secure protocols like non replaceable transactions. This type of transactions are made in such a way that ones they are broadcasted they can’t be replaced by another transaction

CONCLUSION

Source

Transaction replacement attack pose a serious threat to the blockchain network, as it undermines the security and integrity of the network, it also leads to financial losses for legitimate users, as a result of double spending.