First off, I agree that current AI detection tools are far from perfect. Setting a high threshold like 90% probability seems wise before accusing someone of using AI. False accusations could really damage the community and people's reputations.

Your suggestion about "natural detection" being more reliable is well taken. As humans, we tend to have a good intuitive sense when content doesn't "sound" quite right or natural. Comparing writing styles (especially the comments) over time for a given author seems like a smart way to identify odd deviations that may indicate AI use.

However, as you pointed out, that too depends on the subject matter and context. For instance, the writing style of a fictional story is totally different from a casual post. Moreover, moderators checking the post should also be aware of “language diction” to avoid any misconception on their part.

Additionally, a transparent appeals process for accused creators could help fix any mistaken AI allegations. Handling disputes calmly and giving benefit of the doubt initially seems prudent. It’s possible that if such a system existed, I could’ve avoided the unpleasant situation I had to go through. Although I tried resolving my case on Discord first, it didn’t work out...

Overall, I appreciate you raising these concerns and suggestions in a constructive way. You clearly want to see this platform thrive without damaging content creators' reputations unfairly. 🙂