Chemtrails Aren't the Geoengineering Debate We Should Be Having

From the Office of Harvard's Geoengineering Program – The Keith Group

I have been looking over the latest article released by Gernot Wagner on April 11, 2018. I am always happy to see them come out with these public documents that are here to address my concerns pertaining to some of the things I see in the sky. It always gives me such a warm feeling of contentment when Mr. Keith's office sets aside a little time to reassure me that I have nothing at all to be concerned with and in reality it is quite silly for me to even consider any of my own thoughts and observations. There was such a weight lifted from me when I finally came to the realization that Harvard has my best interests in mind and I can just go on with my lackadaisical lifestyle and.... ummm, actually no, that's not at all how I feel.

Mr. Wagner I am sorry but your paper did little to reassure me or give me any feeling of comfort but I do look forward to your next attempt so please never give up! I will give up when I receive a sound answer to my simple questions that you will find below. I am not going to give an in-depth breakdown of your article as it is really just a lot of the same thing that Harvard has been pushing out for a decade now. Perhaps for your next article you will share more credible data rather than simply sharing other people's opinions. You guys really need to step up your game over there in your Harvard Think Tank because it is becoming increasingly obvious to me that you are letting yourselves get backed into a small corner as you try to maintain your narrative.

---

GeoEngineering Geoengineering- Now that is a huge topic with plenty of rabbit holes for you to jump down should you ever be inclined. The simplest understanding of Geoengineering is any man made activity that has an impact on Earth's normal Physical/Biological patterns. What has always seemed a major concern for the entirety of my lifetime has been the buildup of CO2 in our atmosphere. Sadly when the data was coming in during the late 60's and early 70's little was done to openly address the concern. Behind the scenes however there was a growing list of patents and techniques being developed and deployed with the largest percentage of those falling under the Weather Modification category. When we use the term Geoengineering we have to keep in mind the full scope of what that term means. Weather modification is Geoengineering and this global program has been openly admitted to and well documented for generations now. Weather Modification is not usually where we get the Push-Back from our beloved friends in academic and scientific societies. Normally their debunking efforts are centered around the Solar Radiation Management and Carbon Management programs which are two distinctly different fields but both still focusing on the same issue; the 50 plus year concern of the rapid buildup of CO2 in our atmosphere. Luckily for Harvard the only real thing they need to address falls under the SRM category and they are able to focus that lens in even smaller to simply address the ever popular and growing belief that some of the condensation trails left by aircraft we see in the sky don't really seem to be condensation. I am most definitely on the growing list of skeptics and my skepticism is not rooted in an online video I saw once but rather it comes from my own observance of a condensation trail expelled from aircraft engine lingering in the sky for hours and spreading to more than one kilometer wide. That's still critical in scientific method right; to observe?

You have to understand they try to reel us in on what they obviously see as an issue that needs to be dealt with by giving us a look into their research of Solar Radiation Management; that is the main Geoengineering program that Harvard is overseeing and consists of different theories as to how they can reflect a portion of the suns radiation back into space to combat global warming. What Harvard says is that we do not posses the technology to have an effective SRM program as we would need to inject reflective particles much higher into the stratosphere than we are currently able. Then based on that logic, which truly is sound logic in my opinion, we are told that the Chemtrail Conspiracy is therefor not valid. Why would they be spraying reflective particulates in an area of the atmosphere that would have little impact in reflecting a portion of the sunlight back into space? I totally agree with them as based on sound scientific theory they would indeed need to be injecting these reflective particulates higher into the stratosphere around 60-70K feet for the program to have any degree of efficiency. To inject reflective particles at the level most commercial aircraft fly would be extremely inefficient in regards to SRM as the reflective particles would have to be injected at an almost constant basis to have any real impact on managing solar radiation. So then I suppose that should take all of my concerns over these persistent contrails, that I see on almost a constant basis, off the table because I truly am not able to give them an answer as to why then they would be doing this.

I have said this before but I will continue to do so for as long as it is valid to do so. To whatever science, academic or government body that wants to hear this please hear me clearly: I am in no way, shape or form bound to first have to give you an irrefutable answer to the question “Why you would be doing this” before I have the right to have my general questions about persistent condensation trails addressed. Let's take the whole SRM program off the table for a minute and have The Keith Group simply give me a breakdown of how today's modern jet engine, that if my research is valid is on almost every commercial aircraft flying in the skies today, can produce one of these persistent vapor trails.

I have seen plenty of sound evidence that indeed a Hi-bypass engine can produce condensation and just to give an example of this you can find a good explanation here but this still seems a bit diversionary in regards to my question. I am not asking if a contrail can be formed by today's modern jet engine, my question is how do a portion of these condensation trails linger in the sky for hours, grow to a great many times their original size, at times combine with other of these condensation trails and together completely haze out the sky from horizon to horizon- While at the same time other aircraft with the same type of engine are flying through this implied Ice Crystal Haze and leave a quickly dispersing trail of condensation or even leave no evidence of condensation at all?

When you hear from people that research these persistent condensation trails or “Chemtrails” it is common to hear how they relate them to the Solar Radiation Management program. It's not that I disagree with this theory but I just feel it allows people like David Keith and The Keith Group to only have to focus in on that one area in their debunking efforts. These persistent vapor trails may have nothing to do with a SRM program at all and could be just a part of the widely accepted and admitted Weather Modification Campaign. They may be using these for any number of reasons but I am done with being made to feel like I have to have a valid reason as to “Why” they are up there before my completely valid argument can be addressed.

I'll be honest and say that the efforts made to debunk the “Chemtrail Conspiracy” can be overwhelming to someone earnestly seeking after the truth. I have not addressed much about the article that is listed at the top of this blog as I really have been trying to keep this as short as possible. I am not trying to emphatically debunk their debunking but I do want to reiterate something that is common in some of my other articles here on Steemit and that is to point out the fact that the reason they keep trying to debunk our theories is because we are being effective in getting our observations out there. More people are listening to us and are indeed asking questions of their own. The article states that 60 percent of all social media discourse on geoengineering is conspiratorial and that is where I am finding some reassurance that our efforts are not in vain. We simply have to stay the course and continue to keep being diligent on getting our perspective and our observations out there. I am only about halfway through the latest from the Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News radio broadcast and I am still on the high I got from last week's broadcast where Dane talks about hitting that Critical Mass of people and we are getting there.

I will say it again,
WE ARE GETTING THERE! Please, don't you doubt it for a moment.

Consistently and effectively sharing credible data is key and one day, whatever these persistent vapor trails are hinged on, they will finally be unable to maintain the lie that this is simply condensation. No one has the right to make you feel obligated to know all the reasons why before you can start asking your questions.

Please never stop asking your questions,