Crypto terrorists: the decentralized giant
When do you think it will start? When will we the people be classified as enemies of the state, all states? When will the citizens be labelled terrorists by their own governments for supporting crypocurrencies?
The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill on September 26 that would establish a crypto task force to combat terrorist use of cryptocurrencies, public records indicate.
According to public records published on the official online database of the U.S. Congress, the new version of the bill has been passed by the whole House by voice vote.
source
How often does the House of Representatives pass a bill supported by the whole house?
From the US government perspective, as soon as something crosses into the bounds of terrorism, there are no longer boundaries. The continual giving up citizen rights in the name of security has seen to that and now it is an at any cost process, and the cost is our privacy. Any perceived threat to national security can be investigated and bringing cryptocurrencies into the legal framework under the broad umbrella of "terrorism" means that all action is permitted, all methods.
The narrative of decentralization even aids their cause as it behaves much like a terrorist organization, no head, compartmentalized, anonymous and of course, encrypted communications. It is not hard to get ignorant public support to hunt down the Bitcoin terror groups. Tell me, do you know if any bitcoin you have ever traded has ended up in the hands of a terror group?
As previously reported by Cointelegraph, during a Sept. 7 U.S. Congressional hearing of the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Illicit Finance, FDD CSIF director of analysis Yaya Fanusie claimed that crypto is a “poor form of money for jihadists” and “cold hard cash is still king.” According to Fanusie’s conclusions in the report, terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, and others have not had great success in raising funds through cryptocurrency.
source
Tell me then, if several weeks before the bill was passed experts stated to Congress that cryptocurrencies were a “poor form of money for jihadists” and “cold hard cash is still king.”, why was the task force created?
They don't care about terrorism, they don't care about crypto. What they care about is the last quote; “cold hard cash is still king.” It is not only still king, it is they who have the Kings ear to whisper into and hand to lead where they choose. Decentralized currencies are a threat to their source of power, the economic control of citizens.
It won't be long until the sanctioned searches begin and some harsh examples are created or engineered to make it look like what they are doing is in the name of security, in the best interests of citizens. It will be a continued but ramped up attempt to undermine the legitimacy of cryptocurrencies as a contender for the throne. They will ridicule it and punish those who support it but, it won't matter.
Because even as they restrict, it will continue to spread out of their reaches all over the world and slowly be adopted for usage by small users and the odd large entity across the globe. And the technology, they don't want to lose, there is too much value in it, too much opportunity. It will be their own greed that is their downfall.
Perhaps we are on an ultimate path of decentralization that started long ago. From church control forking into church and state and then forking again into church, state and bank. The church has lost favor to state and bank as they collude heavily, but perhaps they are beginning to get too ambitious to maintain their partnerships.
Maybe the state and bank have a growing divide in the power sharing and each wants to maintain singular control. The state is at the disadvantage in this opportunity though as they have tied their power to the bank they draw value and rely upon to fund their enterprises. The banks however see an opportunity to cutaway the dead weight, usurp the throne for themselves by forking out their long-time partner.
It is the state that relies on fiat, not the banks as they can trade in commodities, they can trade in anything of perceived value including cryptocurrencies. If they are able to play their cards right, they will be able to take a step past government and not just be financiers with equal stake, but controllers with provision provided at their leisure.
But, they still need the governments, they need the enforcer of legislation and dealer of fear to control the space so it does not get out of hand, so they can maintain grip without it fractaling into cells it can no longer maintain sight of. The game they maybe playing is a risky one though as it depends on a variable they think they know; us.
For a thousand years they have held us in their grip, trained us, punished us, directed us - and we have followed, we have supported. We have not bitten the hand that we have been led to believe feeds us, while like vampires they suck our value dry on an intravenous line of credit.
But, their value is us and the only reason it holds sway over our thoughts and behaviors is because we have been led to believe that we as a group are incapable of managing ourselves, to holding our own value and directing it to where we want it to go. But for the first time in global societal history, we don't need them.
Their system is fundamentally flawed, it is centralized it is slow and, it is us who give it any value whatsoever through the purchases we make. What happens when we realize that we have an alternative? What happens when our bank loans are blockchain investors, our insurance coverage is crowdsourced globally, the businesses we own and frequent accept the new values? When we have a self-funded universal basic income, medical research, social capital to spend where we choose?
What happens to the value of the dollar when what we used to buy with fiat we use crypto only, when the businesses from small to large decide that the banking fees are too high, the loan terms ridiculous and there is alternative funding available? What happens when the only alternative for citizens to make their daily purchases is through the stability of crypto as the fiat currencies swing wildly in the wind, useless, powerless.
Maybe we are terrorists in the eyes of those who believe that the security of state and centralization is superior. The people who think nationalism and statism are secure. Those who live via proxy, outsourced decisions, the controlled and the controllers.
Are we not going to change the way of life they are accustomed to? Are we not going to tear the fabric of society they are comfortably wearing. Are we not going to change what it means for them to be a citizen, a member of a community? Will they feel liberated if we get our way or oppressed in defeat of what they knew and loved, even though what that was, was making them ill?
The world is changing and it is being attacked at the most fundamental source of power, the financial systems that are in place to draw from the pool of citizen value to line pockets, finance wars, control nations and oppress many to over-reward a few. There are games at play that will affect the highest levels but will be played at the lowest, in the trenches except that this time, rather than mere peons, we are decentralized decision makers with power and responsibility to choose our own path though the buying decisions we make and the medium we use.
What the centralized powers have failed to grasp is that without us, they are nothing. What we have so far failed to grasp is that we are able to now control our own value and do all the things that they have done for us, without them.
We are the sleeping giant. We are maturing. How long until we awaken?
Taraz
[ a Steem original ]
I don't think we need to use crypto currency to be classed as terrorists, we may already be under that classification if this it's anything to go by
Also, if you can find the time to watch the two videos in this post you might begin to question if banks and government are even separate entities. The second video in particular is worrying.
They decide the definition of terrorist which is anyone who they cannot control.
I will have a watch later I hope. I actually don't think they are separated but what I think the banks could do is cut away the unprofitable parts of government, the parts that might sometimes help the community.
The parts that help the community will stay if they serve a purpose for them. If not, they won't bother.
IMO it has already started, actually quite a while ago. it's just not widely publicized or noticed bu wide public.
but perhaps it would be spread wider and increase after certain command will be given. things are developing according to some plan, whatever it is. present stage as I can understand - some sort of "controlled demolition" of cash fiat money, while at the same time gradual transition into "Cashless Society". they can't afford to keep present financial system to remain, but at the same time neither can abruptly "cancel" it, i.e. reformat too soon. thus it is some kind of a transitional period.
and part of it is "de-dollarization", which is in the full swing. which relates to this your question asked:
first of all, dollar has no value. LOL :D
perhaps ever since it was stopped being backed by gold in early 90s.
it is a BIGGEST Ponzi scheme (or "scam" / fraud), along with all the other fiat currencies, but biggest of all of them - being the so called "global reserve currency".
and it is more correct to say that now rather its "real value", or the absence of it, would be made more open and obvious.
as for usage of Crypto instead of Fiat - that's not sure, frankly.
more likely, instead of USD and other fiat would be imposed some or other "Crypto-Fiat". I have also pondered on all such potential scenarios in my own recent blog post. IMO USD (and its clones) would simply "morph" into their Digital versions.
If that happens - then perhaps the whole Crypto would be effectively made off the limits / illegal, etc. Perhaps now it is already starting slowly and gradually - as provides example news article quoted here by you.
Yep. we choose to give it value by using it as if it has.
This is very likely but why should we use it if we agree to use our own? ;) :D
I am a self-professed enemy of the state because the state is the largest and most despicable of all terrorist organizations.
As presently constituted, human governments, AKA "the state," claim the right to initiate force against individuals and groups of individuals based on completely arbitrary criteria that have not been agreed to by those whom the state presumes to control.
I do not willingly consent to the application of force by the state, nor do I voluntarily support the state's usurping of my life or my freedom of movement or their taking of my property.
This contest between cryptoanarchy and the state will be fascinating to watch as it continues to play out. As more and more people begin to truly understand the liberating effects of crypto and decentralized organizations, more and more of the inherent value behind "money" will flow from the existing power brokers and into all morally well defined distributed ledger and similar populist systems.
😄😇😄

What is amazing with it all is the simplicity of the process as all that is needed is accountability and transparency of action and the governments are laid bare and the mechanisms of control are stopped in their place. Without debt, how do they finance an army, how do they impose sweeping arbitrary laws that satisfy so few? It is going to get fierce though.
For the banks could be a double-edged sword, but in turn for them it will be a win, I explain in countries like mine that I can be possessors of Crypto but there are very few companies or businesses that accept it, the banks play a important role, since among natural persons are bought the coins whatever, and in one way or another use a bank as a means of operator so that the local currency can be deposited in the account.
Many Venezuelans are in STEEMIT but in Venezuela no business or company accepts it. so they buy me and the buyer deposits my money in my account. I can give you an example with this page
https://www.orinococambio.com/
https://steempays.net/portal
And the intermediary is a bank and they know it by the volume of operations that are presented through these portals
By the way I hope you do not consider an abuse that leaves you a link to a post I made thanks to the inspiration of a post made by you.
What are you most grateful for?
Banks aren't evil, how they are currently engineered and operated is though. The definition of what a bank is is going to change over time as we are all becoming banks of a sort capable of performing the tasks at small scale for free, what they do at large for a fee. We are direct bankers.
I will have a look at your post :)
In politics terrorism is an easy sell. What makes me nervous though is terrorism seems to get a broader and broader definition.
It would be easy to throw cryptocurrency under the umbrella of terrorism as a form of governmebt disruption making people afraid of it.
Its a far stretch, but seems something that could happen in the future.
Posted using Partiko Android
It is already under the umbrella which I think is more to be able to track and investigate average users than anything to do with terror risks. I is an easy sell because of the fear a word can evoke.
Agreed
Posted using Partiko Android
The governments and big Banks will not go down without a fight, you can be sure of that. They know what crypto represents as fat as the exploitative status quo is concerned, and will do everything to maintain it
I wonder if we can turn them against each other. The banks are greed personified and crypto is a money maker attraction for them in many ways. The governments are slower to react. Play them off against each other, make them believe they can each go alone, one through the suppression of technology, the other though the empowerment of it. Banks will likely win and then, fork them.
I Wonder. While Banks are generally greedy, they probably see crypto as too much of a threat to actually take such risks and will rather align with the goverment
They are building their exchanges as we speak with all the large players with services in the pipeline.
I can see some fights coming up between the banks and governments. Governments like control and letting go will be difficult.
They aren't going to let go I think. If it is possible, the infrastructure will be built as theirs crumbles and the value will shift across. What is going to be interesting is that in time, the inflated value volume of fiat will be trimmed and there will be a more accurate accounting of resources at a global level. Well, I hope .
Now you got me hooked as a follower, I like your style and thinking.
Much appreciated. I write a lot and the topics vary greatly but, skip what isn't relevant for you and occasionally you may find something that is worth your time.
I followed you before, though then you seemed to be only talking about steemit, and this for me shows me you have a lot more depth, and to be honest really impressed me, and as everything is subjective, yep, you are one deep thinker, and with this post, bang on point, we can take the control back, and it is not far off.
Have a superb weekend.
I completely understand this view and I do write about Steem a lot. I actually just wrote a post based on this comment touching on why but in short, I see it as part of the decentalization and education efforts to create new thinking and active culture more supportive of where we might want to be in the future. It isn't for everyone though and can likely be skipped by many who have already made the leaps necessary.
You too mate.
They will soon have their own problems to deal with as governments will be next to claims "too big to fail" and the debt pyramid that they have created will crumble down taken most of us with it unfortunately. It is kind of scary as the social unrest could be dangerous and all we can do is prepare in the sidelines for something better.
I wonder though, does it have to take us with it? Hypothetically, as long as we can offer a currency to trade with, we don't actually need buy in do we? Rather than have people use fiat to get in, they do like we do here and use their content and for the companies, their products. Business can go on somewhat as normal minus the inflated values of things and the blockchain accounts for products and services 1:1 through smart contracts etc.
I am off to bed (almost 4) so will have to think more on it :)
Not from a financial sense but my concern is what desperate people will do...
Banks are controlled and maniplulated by governments just as are stocks, bonds , markets, etc. Even though it did not start out this way. The government uses the word terrorists to scare! They are tring to manipulatr crypto just as they have the rest of the currency. This scares them and they will continue to impliment regulations in an attempt to gain control of crypto.