Crowd Rush A Court in England To Arrest The Judge! Most Courts Operate Unlawfully & Government/Monarch are NOT Above Everyone Else.

A fundamental truth of reality is that no-one has the rightful power to control anyone else. This will sound strange to many though, since we are typically conditioned by media and education systems to conform to the idea that there are 'authorities' who 'know best' and 'can tell you what to do'. As long as we continue to operate on blind faith and trust these groups/individuals with our own destiny we CANNOT be truly free and we will never reach humanity's true potential.

I posted previously about Marc Stevens who is a well known voice in the world movement for 'correcting' the massive injustice that takes place daily on Earth and he's on Steemit too! His approach has evolved over time and typically involves challenging the jurisdiction of a 'court', which means that he is forcing the court to prove that it is has the authority to hear the court case at all. Since such 'authority' actually resides within each individual and is an unchangeable aspect of existence itself and thus of 'natural law' - the reality is that many court cases have had to be thrown out simply by this most basic challenge. In short, he has a lot of documentation now to show that when challenged, the court systems cannot prove jurisdiction in a fully logical and detailed way - at best they might mutter something about what ultimately comes down to their beliefs.

This is all quite similar to the issues covered in my other recent post that explains how to cancel alleged debts from banks and 'lenders' simply by requiring them to prove that the alleged debt exists. They cannot usually prove that because their entire system is fraudulent and their fraud would be exposed in the process of them validating their claim of the existence of a debt.

These are all puzzle pieces that need to be understood if we are to liberate Earth and increase peace and success for all beings.

Ex British Empire Nations Lead The Way (In Smashing Empire).

---

It makes sense that if a great evil arises in the world that threatens liberty everywhere, it will be those liberty minded and honest people within the area of it's origin that will be best placed to derail it. They are closest to the source of the problem and most in tune with the details of it's construction and the methods of it's disposal. It is a great mistake to judge that 'The British Empire was wrong, so all British people are wrong' or anything like that, since it is usually only a small number of twisted people who intend to deceive and overpower virtually everyone else who are behind such problems. They operate in secret and have no problem with harming 'their own people' if it serves them to - all while claiming to be highly patriotic.

While British law is often held up as being 'the best in the world' - the reality is that British law is among the most corrupt ever created. As with all these deceptions, there is always a public face that 'looks good' and a reality that operates behind the scenes that is terrible and convenient for the system's operators and not for anyone else. Since British Law was exported to Canada, Australia and many other places - including the common law being the foundation of American Law - it follows that people in these areas will be working hard to correct the problems. I have found many now in these places who have put many years of research into the relevant topics and have had good successes - albeit with unnecessary hard times too.

Arresting a Judge

---

I am sure that hardly anyone here will be aware that a few years ago in Britain a group of maybe about 100 people came together to arrest a 'Judge' who was sitting in a court in Liverpool, England. The story was blacked out in the media and for 'good reason' from the perspective of the controllers. The crowd gathered because there has long been a division within the 'law' system whereby there exists a form of law that is simple and which is not dictated by parliament and it is ancient and called 'common law' - the courts in England have been deliberately denying common law and acting as if the parliamentary 'statute law' as the 'highest law in the land' and applies to everyone regardless. When you read about the essence of common law, you will see why this is so important.

Here's a quote from the British Consitution group on the subject:

Common Law was established by Alfred the Great, who reigned from 871-899AD. He compiled the laws and customs of the nation into the "Liber Judicialis," based on the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule. Alfred's son, Edward, declared

To all who are charged with the administration of public affairs I give the express command that they show themselves in all things to be just judges precisely as in the Liber Judicialis it is written; nor shall any of them fear to declare the common law freely and courageously.

In contradiction to the Common Law, the Civil Law of Rome prevailed in continental Europe. When William the Conqueror invaded in 1066, he brought with him jurists and clerics steeped in the principles of Roman civil law. Our ancient laws and customs withstood the shock, and remained without any serious amendment. Common Law includes the Charter of Liberties, which makes the Monarch subject to the law, the 1102 Synod of Westminster, which abolished slavery in England, the 1627 Petition of Right, which granted the right to criticise the government without fear of arrest, as well as Magna Carta and the Declaration of Right. Common Law defends property rights and rights to self defence.

Many of our greatest constitutional documents are Common Law documents. These are not Acts of Parliament. Their principles cannot be repealed by Parliament, and when our Monarch swore to uphold the "laws and customs" of the people of the United Kingdom at her Coronation, those "laws and customs" include Common Law.

So this system essentially is the lynch pin that ensures 'monarchs' and 'governments' are equal to the rest of the people and NOT higher than the people - even in law. Therefore, it is clear as to why corrupt court agents and governments would not want this to be understood and would attempt to switch the courts from common law to statute law at every opportunity.

As you will see the people in the following video explain - judges in England must be 'on their oath', which means that they are acting in accordance with a specific oath that states that they are upholding common law. If they fail to do this then they have no 'authority' in the court and are acting in dishonor - whereas, if they do state they are acting on their oath then a wide array of court cases that are based on government mandated legislation will have to be thrown out and cancelled since there are common law protections that prevent such statute law being enacted.

There are some people who claim that this approach is nonsense, but as far as I am concerned, the facts show that this approach is entirely valid.

Even if you aren't interested in 'law' at all, this video makes some highly unusual watching!

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul

Buy My T-Shirts, Gifts & Other Clothing Here.