Refining my understanding how decentralization will radically alter the political-economic structure of human civilization…

I previously wrote:

Note I don’t willingly align any of my work with those who promote hate based on race, religion, or gender. Or generally hate for any reason.

Before I had written this blog, I had written a comment also expressing the point I emphasize in bold in the quote below from Martin Armstrong’s recent blog.

Martin Armstron wrote:

If we can neutralize government then we can save the future. Trump was elected because the silent majority can no longer survive not because he was this wonderful person. They wanted a non-career politician to reform Capitol Hill. So under the surface, the resistance is starting to rise. We still have the Marxists to deal with and these people are just as hateful as the White Supremacists. We are caught in between these two extreme groups and this raises the potential of a civil war as each side attempts to take control and subjugate the other.

Of course, theses two extremes are really rising because of the fact that their life styles are being diminished by taxes. The Marxists point to wealth inequality as if taking all the toys from the rich will make their life better. They tried that with Communism – it too failed. The White Supremacists see their life style diminishing and [incorrectly] blame the Jews, immigrants, and minorities because of their dominance in banking. The problem is always government. It consumes more than 50% of the GDP which is just wasted. That reduces the standard of living for everyone. Hunting the rich causes them to hoard and invest less so you then have economics also declining and today 2% growth is hailed as fantastic. The larger government becomes, the lower the economic growth, the higher the taxes, and the lower our standard of living since government produces nothing.

But in that blog post MA has not identified the core issue (although he has written in other blogs about the harm socialism and feminism have done), which is rather the ideological subversion (e.g. teaching Marxism in schools) that has divided-and-conquered white^* people and enabled the insoluble power vacuum of political economics to be filled by those who can mismanage. Every IQ shredder (i.e. high IQ whites don’t reproduce, low IQ irresponsible reproduce like rabbits) ends up a third world hell hole of corruption and mismanagement where they can’t keep the electric power turned on reliably. This power vacuum must necessarily be overthrown else it will end up in megadeath, which is why moderate whites can’t have a voice in the outcome and can only through their self-deceptive “open-mindedness” lend aid to the accelerating clusterfuck.

Chinese are less cooperative than American whites or their Japanese derivatives. I even see this tribalism amongst filipinos in that they are not society-wide cooperative. Defection in most societies is so great that the government becomes a clusterfucked power vacuum. So thus China is ruled by oligarchy or strong rulers, and the Chinese admire this strength, because they know without it they end up in Seven Kill Stele megadeath defection.

How can high IQ white men reproduce in a way that resists this “slippery slope” ideological subversion if the females can’t be prevented from defecting to it?

This is why James A. Donald advocates a nation-state orthodoxy run by a white male king, so as to provide a society-wide protection against defection to ideological subversion. This is why those who support progressive, open-minded, moderate politics, are actually enabling megadeath.

I’m hoping for a weak orthodoxy by reducing the power vacuum that gives government its power, by improving decentralization technology. In this way, I hope to see groups of men form their own decentralized communities and orthodoxies wherein those in their group who want to defect are kicked out on their ass as a disincentive to others in their group who might want to follow them. In other words, those who defect from a productive/reproductive high IQ group to the unproductive clusterfuck of general society, thus will end up in quite the hell hole. This is unfortunate, but I see no other possible outcome. In our rational (i.e. evolutionarily and economically justifiable) love for the (diversity that provides the resilience of the) human species we can try to teach, even offer help/compassion in the form of 7 years of slavery for those who want restitution, but we can’t own the free will of others. Everyone must be free to choose and eat the forbidden fruit of ideological nonsense if they so desire to fall into the woodchipper by their own volition.

That is the K strategy, but it might not be viable because the general society may be too enticing for Eve (including defection of high IQ females from reproduction and their ideological indoctrination of the offspring). The alphamale R strategy is to scattershot sperm, let the male offspring randomly latch on to the decentralized technology and repeat his father’s example. I see the possibility of combining the K and R strategy, wherein you scattershot your sperm, but you provide fatherly support to all your offspring (because you’re wealthy and why not?). You offer most of your time to the most promising of your offspring. Seems to me this would be a very competitive evolutionary strategy. But the R strategy can’t work if the government can compel you to pay alimony and child support which is commensurate to your wealth and prevents you from having multiple wives (because then the wives have no incentive to compete to raise your offspring in a way you approve of). This is the dilemma that forces James A. Donald to proclaim we need a white male king to impose a strong orthodoxy. One radical way around the dilemma (at least until the government has a DNA matching database on all males on earth) is to employ deception so as to not produce offspring with your DNA in the relationships which are known to anyone in or around those relationships.

White men (at least those with a high IQ who are capable) need to end their self-deceptive ideological subversion, and come to grips with the reality that we can’t fix the general society^* as a whole. We must be more selective in our focus. Nature will take care of any necessary culling and maintaining the wide IQ distribution for European descended whites if for any various reasons why it still needs to be. Economic opportunity costs and inexorable maximum division-of-labor specialization will provide upward mobility in a meritocracy.

^* _{I emphasize ideological subversion of European lineage whites because I have in mind the IQ distribution curve differences between whites and other races, and even between European descended whites and East Asian whites which I discussed in my blog. IOW, European descended white males have I think a unique biological and evolutionary incentive/opportunity to cooperate on preventing ideological subversion. I also welcome any improvement by any races and cultures (and even any natural and economically viable integration between all races), but I think European descended whites may have the best opportunity for doing so and especially since the imminent collapse of our societies provides us the motivation to do so. Remember the link in my blog to the IQ distribution of European descended whites, exhibits that we have a lot of really dumb whites in addition to more very high IQ whites than other races including more than white East Asians, even though the average IQ of white East Asians is higher than European descended whites.}