My comment on Is President Trump right that there was violence on “both sides” in Charlottesville?:

I echo @NPSF3000’s point. How can you prove that those who were marching are on the same “side” as the lunatic driver? Do you have any proof that each of those who marched are in support of or were in any way complicit with the lunatic driver? Why are you helping to foment the civil war that is coming to the USA by declaring that country is divided into two sides? Do you want a war? Who could upvote this answer and claim they are rational.

My second comment:

Stop with this “violence on both sides”. There was violence on all sides, but this is not a war between two united sides, but rather violence by radicals against Americans of many shades of politics views and values. Y’all are allowing your minds to be programmed into divide-and-conquer with a civil war dismantling the USA as we know it. See my other comment for a link with more details on what is coming.

And my third comment:

Although there were two sides roughly defined as for and against the removal of confederate statues, it is not correct to associate the violence as being supported by or complicit with each member of the rally or those who were protesting the rally. You’re allowing radicals who foment violence to turn political protest into a war between two sides wherein you will have no choice but to join one of the sides and fight to the bloody death of the USA as we know it. Congrats. @dsollen, hating each other is how we bring about the next megadeath.

EDIT: I should have archived the page, because my comments above were removed by the moderator. I guess my comments were embarrassing for the mods.

It is hilarious that Europeans think so highly of themselves, yet they elected Merkel who is intentionally driving the destruction of Europe with migrants. Interestingly it seems Germans hate their insular culture, which may explain their ambivalence to the migrant issue—psychologically they want to be invaded.