You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: "WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT FLAT EARTH" - THE TIME HAS COME.
Yeah, this has been debunked for years now. If that's the curve then New Mexico covers 1/3 of the "ball".
Yeah, this has been debunked for years now. If that's the curve then New Mexico covers 1/3 of the "ball".
Debunked, does that include the fish eye effect, that is not visible on the foreground but only on the background, out of focus. Did you try google earth from those altitudes to compare what the scale would be? debunked, fishy.
Yes, very debunked, very "fishy" indeed. This is not even something that Heliocentric defenders use as "proof" any longer, as it is clearly a go-pro, fish-eye lens, as made very evident by the size of New Mexico below it. There's no debate here.
Yeah, fish eye lens that doesn't distort the foreground, just the background, The numerous shapes in the foreground aren't distorted at all.
Yeah, evidently they cropped up some horizon, where is the endless flat earth? Why does the horizon fall off it the plane goes on for ever in all directions?
Great question. You should really look into it, if you're interested. :)
Yeah, fish eye lens that doesn't distort the foreground, just the background, The numerous shapes in the foreground aren't distorted at all.
It's fish eye lens, the horizon is cropped because it goes on to infinity at eye level.