The 'Adoption and Safe Families Act' and the Clinton's Legacy of Screwing Over African American and Poor Families

in familyprotection •  last year  (edited)

While Bill Clinton was President of the United States, his wife Hillary Clinton was influential in getting some bills passed into law, as she personally pushed for them to become law. Democrats get a lot of the black vote, and Democrats "love" the black community for it. It would seem to reason that they would be doing things in favor of African American families, not screwing them over.

Source: pxhere

Black politicians and pastors line up to support the Clintons, both Bill and recently Hillary. When Hillary was running for president, the usual courting of the black community was in effect, trying to win over their hearts and minds to win the election. Improving the conditions of black people's lives is an important part of politics for the Democrats. Playing the black card is a way to a win in many cases. But the black community has been played over and over by the Clintons.

Bill Clinton won many hearts with his saxophone playing in the Arsenio Hall show. Toni Morrison, a Noble Prize winning author, teacher, and professor emeritus at Princeton University dubbed President Clinton the "first black president". Black voters became loyal to the Democrats over the Republicans, and especially the Clintons. Even when Bernie Sanders was competing with Hillary and campaigning for similar goals as Martin Luther King Jr. with an end to the vast prison system, end to greed, universal healthcare, the black community overall was sticking to the Clintons.

Promises Betrayed

Bill Clinton was supposed to be fighting for an end to racial divide on the campaign trail, but instead chose to play into the right wing against civil rights to embrace a Regan-like agenda on race, crime, welfare and taxes. This was as the black community was losing jobs to outsourced factory work that was disappearing overseas, leaving them unemployed and trapped in racially segregated jobless ghettos.

Unemployments quadrupled and crime rates spiked. To win over the Republican voters to his side, he decided to be tougher on crime, and made sure the black community felt it. After the execution of a mental impaired black man who wanted his last meal's dessert saved for later, Clinton said: " can be nicked a lot, but no one can say I’m soft on crime."

The Democrats won the next election with Bill Clinton in the lead, having revamped the economy, but the black community was losing. More blacks were going to jail during his presidency. He may not have started the war of crime or war on drugs -- which was really a war on people, mostly the poor and blacks by extension -- but he made sure the keep those wars going strong. The "three strikes" rule was ramped up in 1994 as he signed a $30 billion crime bill, creating dozens of new federal capital crimes, mandated life sentences for many 3-time offenses, and granted more than $16 billion in grants for state prisons and police expansion.

By 2001 when Clinton was replaced on the way out to be replaced by Republican George H. W. Bush, the U.S. had the highest rate of incarceration in the world. African Americans composed 80-90% of the convictions for drug offense in seven states. Drug offenses were 26 times higher in 2000 for African Americans than they were in 1983. Clinton was the worst contributor to mass incarceration out of all the presidents since 1980.

Hillary Clinton also lobbied for the crime bill of 1994 that hit blacks harder than whites. Statistics of the time tried to say that the Clinton's policies were goof in helping the black unemployment rate, but they didn't include incarcerated people. Harvard sociologist Bruce Western noted:

"Much of the optimism about declines in racial inequality and the power of the US model of economic growth is misplaced once we account for the invisible poor, behind the walls of America's prisons and jails."

Instead of unemployments falling as the media reported, they neglected to mention how the statistics ignored the increase in black men going to jail for new "crimes" that Bill and Hillary pushed for. Crime and welfare policies that the Clinton's pushed for were part of an agenda to appeal to Republicans again, to reduce big government and save taxpayers dollars.

Prisons as the New Federally Funded Home

Instead of helping American's blacks, the funds for public-housing and child-welfare were slashed by billions, and then transfered to law enforcement and prison system. Public-housing funding went down by 61% and the prisons system was boosted by 171%. Sociologist Loïc Wacquant aptly puts it as "effectively making the construction of prisons the nation's main housing program for the urban poor."

Instead of ending cycles of crime and poverty, the Clintons helped keep millions of Americans locked there. Pell grants for higher education while in prison were eliminated. Students with drug convictions were denied federal financial aid. Anyone who had a felony conviction was denied food stamps or welfare.

A "one strike and you're out" became popular, as families with a member who had committed even a minor offense were being targeted for eviction from public housing. People getting out of prison were not welcome home to their poor families, as that would risk them all being on the street. Many urban areas developed a second-class of citizens who were "subject to legalized discrimination in employment, housing, access to education, and basic public benefits". Many families have been torn apart by the end of Clinton's presidency, with generations moving from impoverished homes and schools into high tech prisons.

Hilary Clinton, as First Lady during her husband's presidency, had a large part to play in the reform of the adoption and foster care system, saying"

"I worked with Tom DeLay, one of the most partisan of Republicans, to reform the adoption and foster care system."

The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA)

The reforms came through the law called Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA). But, contrary to the name, it's not about adoption or making families safe, as is often the case for the Orwellian newspeak of politicians. The target of this new law was the same as the previous crime and welfare laws: the poor and impoverished, especially women and black women. The goal was to help take children way from their mothers.

The ASFA and child welfare was the justification used to enact a policy of "take-the-child-and-run". Poor, and especially black families, were the most affected, destroying thousands of families through wrongful removal of children which continues to this day.

Families were not made safer. Instead, the foster care system grew as a result of the ASFA. Thousands of children were trapped in a growing foster care population. When the middle-class families didn't take in the drove of kidnapped children, a new generation of "legal orphans" came about. If the ASFA didn't become a law, there would probably have been 100,000 less of these "legal orphans" and more families would still be together.

Just as the crime bill encouraged mass incarceration, the ASFA encouraged a massive foster care system. Both hurt the poor and communities of color. Breaking up Black families resulted in a disruption of the Black community and reinforced stereotypes to excuse and justify further taking children from families.

The appearance of delinquent parents grew. The ASFA had false premises to justify taking children. If you lose a child to foster care, it automatically means you're "a sadist, a brute, or a hopeless addict who puts drugs ahead of the children." Poverty was confused with neglect. Two studies of more than 15,000 cases showed that families that stayed together did better for children than children who were torn away and ended up being mistreated in foster care.

To increase breaking up families of the poor and the black community, an effort was underway to put poor children into orphanages, but that was an unpopular word. Instead, in 1995 Republican polling guru Frank Luntz send a memo to stop using the "o" word. The issue then turned into one of "adoption". Who is against adoption, when you're told there are millions of childless Americans who need adopting? They don't tell you that their authoritarian laws are the ones that created these lonely children. An author of the ASFA, Richard Gelles, remarked on this manipulation, stating:

"The adoption component was a way of sanitizing the bill, to make it more appealing to a broader group of people. Adoption is a very popular concept in the country right now."

States were funded with thousands of dollars per child to reach adoption numbers. That means they needed to take children way from their families to reach quotas and get that sweet dough. Child abuse was already declining, but the foster care system kept growing.

Hillary Clinton was the Democrat that did the most to push ASFA through Congress. But she still held favor with the black community and poor, since that's who Democrats purport to help. If the Clinton's never held power, poor American families would have likely had a better outcome. The abuse in foster care would have been reduced, as less children would have been kidnapped. CPS would likely not have grown so much in power, and families everywhere would be safer for it. Children are being legally stolen from families where they would be better off. The "Adoption and Safe Families Act" is an Orwellian sick joke being played upon American families and children.

Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.


If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
Follow me for more content to come!

My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thank-you @krnel for submitting this post with the #familyprotection tag. It has been UPVOTED by @familyprotection and RESTEEMED TO OUR Community Supporters.

"Child Protection Agencies" are taking children away from their loving families.
(If you feel that our community has brought more rewards and attention to this post, please consider contributing a portion of those rewards back to our cause.)

Greetings @krnel

It is no secret that the state policy of the Presidents of the United States (initially Bill Clinton, later George Bush Jr., Barack Obama and now Donald Trump) applied to African-American citizens, calls my attention when you mention the sociologist Loïc Wacquant who refers to "making prison construction the main housing program in the country for the urban poor".

Referring to B. Clinton's way of doing politics was totally opposed to what he proposed in his campaigns and practically carried out a policy of purging the streets in a supposed crusade against crime, but at the same time it was the lever that caused the cordoning off of a group full of needs, where many families in conditions of extreme poverty were not supported nor received opportunities to emerge. The same thing has been repeated with those who preceded him.

The ex-prisoners became segregated, I would say practically a third class of citizens who were discriminated against, without employment, without housing, without access to education and without access to basic public benefits, causing the forced separation of family units.

During the Hurricane Katrina season, which affected much of MIsissipi, Alabama and New Orleans, there was a total structural collapse in the Portchtrain dam's levees, where most people were left adrift after a short attempt by local authorities to help, where there was an inaccurate count of deaths during and after the natural phenomenon.

To confront this difficult and crude situation against African American families, all citizens of all races must work to unify standards, stop turning a blind eye and seek law reform in every state, which will require a great deal of awareness and poise on the part of citizens, their officials and authorities, but I am confident that this could be achieved.


The Mayor of N.O. went to jail over that corrupt bastard, but the people of N.O said I want him for mayor. didn't work out to well for them did it. The Governor was , well who knows where or what she was doing.

The minority groups got screwed form clinton through obama but they did get what they asked for. Some even got a free phone. ain't that special.

Its starting to turn around. minority unemployment is at record lows. its a start just needs to keep going

Greetings @wolfhart It is a good start, the important thing is to make progress on the ground that has been won and not to turn the measures taken into hot wipes' or something temporary. @renny-krieger

that's true have to keep pushing forward.
Shame that there is always that small percentage that have to take advantage of people for self gain

Child abuse was already declining, but the foster care system kept growing.

Just like poverty was declining before the government stepped in. Awareness of situations brings communities together and people do something about it, but when we hand over responsibility to another place we put our trust in them and believe we no longer have to do anything. Little do we realise we're giving authorities free reign.

Exactly. The power needs to be in our hands by caring to do something as a community, not outsourcing our responsibility and power to centralized forces...

As long as the family is not supported, crime rates, suicides and substance use will grow. The fact of separating infants from their parents at the beginning we see it as a problem clearly but, on reaching adulthood this is aggravated, it does not disappear are scars that remain for life

Yup, family matters.

It amazes me that anyone would ever like the clintons, they are a despicable brood of elitists that destroy so many things around the world.

Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 8

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Clearly it's showcasing one thing that, before coming into power showcasing love towards one community and as soon as entered into the power took the action towards that particular community only. And this showcase the great level of racism.

Always political powers work against of common and poor people and they just become enslaved to elites and they work with them behind the scenes. And all their policies always reflects greatly misleading and people forced to follow it.

And in my opinion dividing children from parents is greatest conspiracy and nowadays this process is rapidly increasing and also missing cases are also increased and most of us just staring towards problem but we have to come up with some solution.

Centralised politics is just for controlling and only follows the path of elites and they effectively mislead and manipulate us by fake news and other stuff and this way we are living in an Matrix.

Thanks for sharing this post with us and wishing you an great day. Stay blessed. 🙂

Voted as witness

Good read. Like the way you constructed this article. Inspire me to more and better.

Thank you and thanks for the support. Glad it has provided you with value :)

It is a totally absurd law, without meaning, as it is intended to help a child or adolescent away from his biological family. This concept of "child welfare" does not honor the ASFA, it is a shame that is used to people with needs as "useful fools" in all this novel of government that controls the policy. It is a really sad case.

The Clintons have destroyed so much, I just hope they go away and stay gone away. great article.

nice truth.
What they did to Haiti was criminal

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

A "one strike and you're out" became popular, as families with a member who had committed even a minor offense were being targeted for eviction from public housing

A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it. Oscar Wilde

That means they needed to take children way from their families to reach quotas and get that sweet dough

You get knocked down, you get up, brush yourself off, and you get back to work. Barack Obama

See Forex & Crypto Trading Post Follow Our Account