You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Downvote early, downvote often

in #ethics5 years ago (edited)

From my perspective the point is that the rewards are distributed from inflation.

That would be true if the minumum payout was 0.001 steem.

As it stands now, all the below-minimum payouts (small-fish upvotes) get REDISTRIBUTED to the big-fish (paid to posts that accrue $20 steem or more).

The higher the pending payout is, the bigger percentage of the below-minimum pool they get.

For example, a post with a pending payout of $117.55 steem will get a bigger scoop (%) of the pool than a post with $17.55 steem. It's not "evenly distributed".

https://steemit.com/trending/

It's literally stealing from the poor to feed the rich.

Sort:  

True. Again true. Well, that's when we the people do things like !invest_vote

And again I like to see the advantage of non-evenly distribution: productivity is a standard. If you think you deserve something and it's not coming, don't go after what you expect but after what you do and change it.

See, technically every post is a comment. If a comment looks worth reading why not do a post about it and add a reference to the original thread. More people are going to recognize it within the seven day time period and the posting is going to be rewarded additionally. Until some whales downvote on it and can get hooked on the minimum payout issue.

Perspective determines action. Creativity is a good tool to craft it. !BEER


Hey @logiczombie, here is a little bit of BEER from @andrepol for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking.

@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.15
JST 0.030
BTC 65809.66
ETH 2680.91
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.95