You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The USE-CASE for GOVERNMENT - (GARF)
I'm intrigued.
But wouldn't this "liquid democracy" inadvertently hand all the power to companies like "Cambridge Analytica"?
And in an era of advanced AI, are you sure you can get, one-vote = one-person?
Would you deny AI the right to vote?
Good questions
Our idea is that liquid democracy will function as a public good. The long-term vision is to replace the current public institutions like governments and parliaments with virtual community for the whole world. This is also a way to prevent manipulations by big capital. This is what I am working with at the moment. https://global.crowdpol.com/
Yes, my personal opinion is that an AI should have the right to vote, one vote per AI, and that humans can delegate their votes to AI and vice versa. Also, AI needs rights in order to stimulate personal relations between humans and AI.
Here is more info https://www.opulens.se/english/how-can-we-democratise-our-world-for-a-post-industrial-future/