I love it when videos are shared with mentioning the length!! And we're in here for the decentralized [approach] for money, right?
And there's another problem with [hierarchic] authority: If one does not follow another one will. That makes me think the problem is not a matter of authority but of [hierarchy]. [Hierarchy] itself is an ethical issue! So with this I want to oppose this wagging finger. +proHUMAN +proFAMILY at first means +proBINDING to me, based on interesting research by Gabor Maté and Gordon Neufeld.
I want to oppose this wagging finger. +proHUMAN +proFAMILY at first means +proBINDING to me, based on interesting research by Gabor Maté and Gordon Neufeld.
Good question! @joeyarnoldvn reminds me on one, because I can see that the human condition is the problem, not. Here comes an axiom I got reminded to yesterday by courtesy of Claude Bernard. "The germ is nothing, the milieu is everything." (that's a machine translation; there might be some more appropriate out there)
Another thing that comes to my mind is, I don't have Axioms. And I am not an Axiom either. Don't! That's an axiom already, right? And I don't mean to contradict myself. I just wanted to stress the concept of property here. Of happiness. I am more in favor of principled approaches. And you probably know what I'm talking about. Probably not.
Well, I don't see "property rights" being a logical extension of personal sovereignty for any case. Certainly a rhetorical extension. As in "Who is allowed to build a fence around XY? And allowed by whom?" While XY can be lots of things like sources of water, meadow lands et cetera, all addressing territory. Yes, I agree, that some territory might be fenced, yet not as a logical extension of someone's sovereignty.
Unfortunately this is something that is seldomly addressed by freedom loving people. There's put rhetoric often to be logic while it's not. Some is logic, yes. But some is not. Where's the grey line?
Yes, I like to say: I have a right to be an a..hole. That's why I logically state that all this is rhetoric. People organize empires from this "logic". That leads us to nowhere other then where we already are. Don't you think? !invest_vote !BEER !COFFEEA
As I've said, when milieu is key, there is no root. It's more a question of polarity. The root for potential (i.e. a field of energy) are two poles. And more! Can be many poles. And all we see is the cause. Yet it's not happening because of some root. !invest_vote !COFFEEA
I promote anarchy, decentralization, to an extent. However, keep in mind that we will never and we can never ever have absolute decentralized anarchy, independence, and everything within our current world. Part of the problem is simply the human condition. Well, technically, it's all for the better. And keep in mind that authority and hierarchy are systems that are not bad. Now, some of these things can be bad. But they don't have to be. But it's vital to get to the root of the problem. Because some of what we label as the problems are simply symptoms of deeper issues at hand.
The meaning to life includes to some extent the opportunity for individuals to make those type of choices, good or bad, right or wrong, and the ability to install an AI app for example might be more preferable over not having a choice in the matter when it comes to human egocentric tyranny.
On & Off
It depends on the AI. Like, if it is just an AI program, then you can turn that on and you can turn that off.
Remote
The problem is when technology has backdoors, remote access, spyware, etc, etc, etc. Hypothetical, technology is fine. But that is theoretical to a point. In real life, it is tricky, complex.
Drawing Lines
I would try not to draw a line. Well, a line is better than no line. But it is better to simply run away from tyranny, etc. The problem is that control freaks weaponize tech to get to us. But we have been countering with alternative tech as a reaction and as a way to compete with the globalists. It's important to try your best to trust tech developers, web developer, app developers, people who are trying their best to build hardware, software, etc, that compete against the ghetto social networks, the Chine Apple Phones, etc.
Trust
We cannot always trust each other for many reasons. We know that. But we can sometimes attempt to trust some people and some things at times when they earn that trust to an extent and for a while. It is also critical to remain optimistic and yet skeptical at the same time.
It is also critical to remain optimistic and yet skeptical at the same time.
I agree.
What do you think about having elections for different AI programs?
Every election cycle, people would be able to vote for the program they think is doing the best job.
The really cool thing is that if you know of a city or state (or even country) that seems to be doing really well, you could vote in a copy for your city or state (or even country)...?
yes very interesting. Maybe a reasonable question to ask would be:
What experiences do people need to develop a sense of personal autonomy?
43:01
Thanks for the vid!
@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?
I love it when videos are shared with mentioning the length!! And we're in here for the decentralized [approach] for money, right?
And there's another problem with [hierarchic] authority: If one does not follow another one will. That makes me think the problem is not a matter of authority but of [hierarchy]. [Hierarchy] itself is an ethical issue! So with this I want to oppose this wagging finger. +proHUMAN +proFAMILY at first means +proBINDING to me, based on interesting research by Gabor Maté and Gordon Neufeld.
@tipu curate !invest_vote
Can you propose "better" more universal AXIOMS?
I love adopting superior AXIOMS.
What are yours?
Love.
Good question! @joeyarnoldvn reminds me on one, because I can see that the human condition is the problem, not. Here comes an axiom I got reminded to yesterday by courtesy of Claude Bernard. "The germ is nothing, the milieu is everything." (that's a machine translation; there might be some more appropriate out there)
Another thing that comes to my mind is, I don't have Axioms. And I am not an Axiom either. Don't! That's an axiom already, right? And I don't mean to contradict myself. I just wanted to stress the concept of property here. Of happiness. I am more in favor of principled approaches. And you probably know what I'm talking about. Probably not.
And sure, there's more.
!invest_vote !COFFEEA
So you're +proPROPERTY and +proHAPPINESS.
I'm guessing that's HUMAN happiness so we seem to agree on the +proHUMAN.
And since property rights are a logical extension of personal sovereignty, that also seems to be covered by +proHUMAN.
Well, I don't see "property rights" being a logical extension of personal sovereignty for any case. Certainly a rhetorical extension. As in "Who is allowed to build a fence around XY? And allowed by whom?" While XY can be lots of things like sources of water, meadow lands et cetera, all addressing territory. Yes, I agree, that some territory might be fenced, yet not as a logical extension of someone's sovereignty.
Unfortunately this is something that is seldomly addressed by freedom loving people. There's put rhetoric often to be logic while it's not. Some is logic, yes. But some is not. Where's the grey line?
Personal Sovereignty begins with,
(1) I have the right to protect my body (my clothes and my possessions).
(2) I have the right to protect my family and close friends.
(3) I have the right to protect my home (land).
Yes, I like to say: I have a right to be an a..hole. That's why I logically state that all this is rhetoric. People organize empires from this "logic". That leads us to nowhere other then where we already are. Don't you think? !invest_vote !BEER !COFFEEA
Are you drawing some sort of bright line between "rhetoric" and "logic"?
It's my understanding that good rhetoric is based on sound logic.
Are you comparing "rhetoric" to "pure opinion"?
View or trade
BEER.Hey @logiczombie, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @andrepol for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking.
@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?
@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?
Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 0/3 - need recharge?)
As I've said, when milieu is key, there is no root. It's more a question of polarity. The root for potential (i.e. a field of energy) are two poles. And more! Can be many poles. And all we see is the cause. Yet it's not happening because of some root. !invest_vote !COFFEEA
No, it has not been my intention to upvote the bot. My accident. See #@andrepol/q2v189
@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?
I promote anarchy, decentralization, to an extent. However, keep in mind that we will never and we can never ever have absolute decentralized anarchy, independence, and everything within our current world. Part of the problem is simply the human condition. Well, technically, it's all for the better. And keep in mind that authority and hierarchy are systems that are not bad. Now, some of these things can be bad. But they don't have to be. But it's vital to get to the root of the problem. Because some of what we label as the problems are simply symptoms of deeper issues at hand.
Ops! I meant this to be a reply to your approach: #@andrepol/q2v12b !invest_vote !COFFEEA
Delicious.
@andrepol denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient! ----> Wer ist investinthefutur ?
@andrepol thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !----> Who is investinthefutur ?
Where do you draw the line?
Would you be in favor of some sort of open-source, resource management software (AI) as a replacement for HUMAN egocentric tyranny?
Choices:
The meaning to life includes to some extent the opportunity for individuals to make those type of choices, good or bad, right or wrong, and the ability to install an AI app for example might be more preferable over not having a choice in the matter when it comes to human egocentric tyranny.
On & Off
It depends on the AI. Like, if it is just an AI program, then you can turn that on and you can turn that off.
Remote
The problem is when technology has backdoors, remote access, spyware, etc, etc, etc. Hypothetical, technology is fine. But that is theoretical to a point. In real life, it is tricky, complex.
Drawing Lines
I would try not to draw a line. Well, a line is better than no line. But it is better to simply run away from tyranny, etc. The problem is that control freaks weaponize tech to get to us. But we have been countering with alternative tech as a reaction and as a way to compete with the globalists. It's important to try your best to trust tech developers, web developer, app developers, people who are trying their best to build hardware, software, etc, that compete against the ghetto social networks, the Chine Apple Phones, etc.
Trust
We cannot always trust each other for many reasons. We know that. But we can sometimes attempt to trust some people and some things at times when they earn that trust to an extent and for a while. It is also critical to remain optimistic and yet skeptical at the same time.
I agree.
What do you think about having elections for different AI programs?
Every election cycle, people would be able to vote for the program they think is doing the best job.
The really cool thing is that if you know of a city or state (or even country) that seems to be doing really well, you could vote in a copy for your city or state (or even country)...?
Congratulations @logiczombie! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPVote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!