You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Should Ethereum hardfork AGAIN?!
The issue is more the auto votes which you receive regardless of the quality of the content in which you post. For example. You could make a post containing nothing but the "Letter A" and you would still receive $25.00 on the post.
This is an issue for Steemit. If you decided to create 100 of these types of post this week it would result in an even larger issue. Does there really need to be "rules" in order to not just take, take, take.
I don't see how you are giving to the community in any way?
Because you never read my posts and you've only been in the community since 2017. You say I post 6 posts a day, so why don't you try actually reading some of them?
Sure maybe not every single post I make is a hit, but not every post any blogger makes is a hit, so why expect different from my posts?
That said if you read my posts you'll see what I contributed. I did not just start posting on Steemit the last few months. To be fair, on the topic of bots, these bots always have existed since the beginning and not always favoring me.
And you're complaining about $25? Some people get $200 per post even now. Unless the posts are of bad quality, and aren't getting upvotes or triggering discussions, why complain?
If you take from within the rules then you're not breaking any of the rules. If another poster for example posts and gets $500 each time should I get upset that they are breaking the bank if they have a fan base willing to upvote them? We do have bloggers who get these sorts of payouts and I'm not one of them.
And no, I'm not going to make BAD posts purposefully just to get rewards from the rewards pool. If you actually read my posts, people comment on almost all of them, and while a few might be bad, the majority are not.
Here is a challenge for you. Find me a model blogger on Steemit who you think deserves $500-1000 a week from their effort whatever their effort is. I understand not everyone is a fan of my posts but who are you a fan of?
She is posting most of her stuff just for money. In the end I don't have anything against if she post 50 articles per day, but all of those articles can't be 25$+. That is abusing reward pool big time. She knows she is doing that, but her ego don't let her to admit that.
You post once a week if that and most of your posts are resteems. The quality of some of your best posts are lower than some of my worst, and you post a few sentences with a picture in most of your posts.
Why not post more than once a week? Just some advice.
Your draining of reward pool don't have anything with anyone including me.
I wrote few articles all in my words, not like yours 'Here is news' bs articles for money.
https://steemit.com/anarchy/@cmoljoe/anarchy-and-voluntaryism-are-our-only-solutions
https://steemit.com/freedom/@cmoljoe/road-to-freedom-series-2-the-myth-of-authority
https://steemit.com/freedom/@cmoljoe/road-to-freedom-series-5-you-are-either-slave-or-anarchist
I offered my readers a survey. You're not one of my readers but the readers can give me feedback on what kind of posts they like to see and on what they think.
The economics encourage as many posts per day as you can make. The economics favor this because back in the day new bloggers like you were making these few sentence posts and complaining about bloggers writing long articles getting $500 a post. So they flattened things out quite a bit, but as we see there are always going to be some bloggers who don't want to put in the effort and who complain.
What matters to me is whether bloggers who put in an equal amount of effort to me are getting noticed. If not then I would agree there is a problem. But a blogger who posts once a week with a few sentences cannot be shocked if they don't get noticed.
We are not talking about me. We are talking about you taking same amount of money for few sentences and reference link.