Two Sides To Every Story
I think anyone that's read any of my work over the last few months will know that this isn't the blog you visit for a mainstream or indeed conspiratorial general consenus, today is going to be no different. The basis of this post comes from two opposing perspectives (both written by myself) made to @tremendospercy and @andrewmarkmusic. This post is also intended to answer a recent question that was posed to me by @imp-unity.
I awoke a couple of weeks ago checked my emails and in the banner was an advert that stated "humanities greatest secret, the hidden origins of our past" the fact it popped up on a well known email provider is an irony that wasn't lost on me. The "greatest secret" turned out to be the Sumerian Annunaki creation myth and it's a subject that really been gathering some steam in the last few years.
Upon reflection, I thought I'd put my own unique spin on this story and incorperate my aforementioned polarised perspectives. Once I have argued the case for each opposing theory I’m going to let the reader know which side I fall on. Obviously, the ideas contained in this post are highly speculative but as the momentum appears to be building, I think it's valid to explore some alternative possibilities.
Who Were The Annunaki?
The Sumerians were an ancient culture with a rich and diverse interpretation of history and creation. The translation of the Sumerian creation myth indicates a belief that in an era of pre history earth was visited by an advanced alien species known as the Annunaki. Within this translation the Annunaki arrived on earth with the sole purpose of mining gold, following years of toil and back-breaking work they decided to genetically engineer an early hominid and thus created humanity to work in their mines.
In essence, the Sumerians are said to have believed that humanity were created as a slave species to the Annunaki Gods. For now I will leave it there as it will spoil the latter part of the post, but bear with me. If you want some broader context and a deeper understanding of the part the Catholic church have to play in this story, I would suggest reading my more research based post which you can find here.
So let’s for the sake of argument say that in terms of evolution the Neanderthal's were the true inheritors of the earth. Recent breakthroughs have shown Neanderthal’s to be kind, caring, family orientated and equally capable of art work, they appear to have been evolving in a perfect symbiosis with the planet. The Annunaki arrive (the serpent) and genetically manipulate these inheritors with their own DNA to create to the homo-sapian.
Perhaps this process could be viewed as the expulsion from the allegorical Garden of Eden. So here we have the homo-sapian, a crossbreed between the caring family orientated Neanderthal and the (highly intelligent but lacking in empathy and compassion) Annunaki whom used the Neanderthal and indeed their genetically manipulated offspring (humanity) as a means to an end.
Obviously not all the Neanderthal would have been manipulated and so as a species they lived for a number of years. Eventually humanity usurped these genuine inheritors of the earth and left them as an obscure memory. The genetic manipulation process has created a schizm in the psyche of mankind and removed us from our true path of longer spiritual growth and sent us on a faster process that is out of step with the rest of nature. Indeed, when you look around at the way we interact with the world it's almost as if we are a stranger.
Due to the synthetic speed of our evolution, intelligence has outpaced our wisdom to express it and this has brought us to a moment in time where we are destroying the eco-system for the sake of greed whilst possessing the weaponry to destroy the planet (our home) ten times over. Our current state of affairs is akin to setting fire to your own house sparking a cigarette and watching it burn down around you, it is the very definition of insanity.
So within this understanding the Annunaki are the Gnostic Demiurge and they are our creator/manipulator, their children (the direct bloodlines) are the archons and they rule over us until this day. Before the Annunaki left they gave their children hidden knowledge relating to human psychology, natural law and the science of the esoteric as a way to ensure they would always be able to keep control of humanity.
The internal darkness of mankind is a direct consequence of our genetic manipulation and today the war to balance these dualities light/dark still rages within each of us, some more than others. As the elites are a direct bloodline to these serpent gods their imbalance has been exasperated, they are highly intelligent but insane with power and bloodlust.
As these bloodlines have selectively bred with humanity (to secure their powerbase) they have become the progenitors of psychopathy. The techno control grid and the transhumanist agenda we see being built around us is a realisation that these bloodlines are finding it increasingly difficult to control us and as with their forbears they are once again attempting to manipulate our evolution so they can retain control.
Or Not To Annunaki
There are many within this line of enquiry that view the Cuneiform texts etc etc as a verbatim historical document, whilst to others they’re simply a metaphorical understanding/misunderstanding or incorrect translation of an event in our pre-history. Personally I'm in both camps because even if the cuneiform translations are correct, as advanced as the Sumerian's obviously were they are still human; from this perspective they were also (to varying degrees) prisoners of perception and potentially ripe for manipulation. Indeed a cursory glance at the recording of our current timeline clearly displays the fact that the historians of the future will not be receiving the truth of our past.
Here we stand on the cusp of the 4th industrial revolution on the brink sweeping aside the entire concept of manual labour and yet we still don't possess a tenth of the technology and knowledge that the Anunnaki were said to hold. They appear to have had a rich heritage and possesed and understanding of morality and natural law (there was said to have been much debate as to whether our manipulation was against these laws) and obviously their technology and the genetic manipulation of said hominid displays a creative ability.
A high degree of intelligence & creativity combined with a vastly superior technology and the mechanics that it would have taken them to get here, makes me wonder why they would have had to have done any work at all? It's my belief that they would have arrived ready to mine without the need for prohibitive and ineffective manual labour and the resources that would consume.
It's also my belief that the desire to create and emulate creation is a universal constant and certainly one that we see playing out around us. From that perspective it seems reasonable to me to suggest that knowing the task that lay ahead they would arrive with some form of robot army to carry out said labour. Or at the very least prepared, planned and created a technology that negated the need for any manual work. Indeed when/if we ever set about mining the universe I believe that our technology will have evolved to the point where this would be the case. I don't believe we would take spacecrafts full of manual workers/miners with us.
In terms of how we (as a collective) appear out of step with nature I have some interesting theories about this, but they are fairly complex and so in order to keep this post as concise as possible I will have to explore them another day.
So in a recent post I discussed entrainment cycles, in this post I wrote: When the social engineers want to introduce a new, controversial idea that is outside of the belief or indeed morality of the populace they use what I call entrainment cycles. They introduce an idea, first of all it will appear in a book or maybe a couple of papers and then they step back and gauge opinion. They then wait for a while and bring in the second cycle and this time it will have a wider reach, more books, more papers, a talk show here and there and then once again they step back.
They repeat this process as many times as is necessary and each time the cycle becomes tighter and receives more coverage. Eventually the cycle becomes so tight and widespread it reaches a singularity of thought, the subconscious of the populace has become so entrained to this new idea/direction that they both accept it and incorporate it into their perceptual reality.
Slave Species To The Gods?
I’ve written about this fairly extensively so I won’t cover old ground but just to give a brief overview. Firstly I very much believe that there was an ancient and highly advanced civilisation that walked the earth prior to our current timeline, an age that has become shrouded by the mists of time. We can perhaps think of this civilisation as very much like homosapians but perhaps they possessed some key differences in cognitive ability and perceptual awareness.
Following an Atlantean style disaster that nearly destroyed said civilisation, they set out to “enlighten” the rest of the world and to a relatively primitive man they would have indeed appeared as “gods”. Where I differ with many others is that I believe they were a terrestrial based species, indeed I’m reminded of Arthur C Clarke’s famous quote.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
As I wrote in my bloodlines post I believe that the elite bloodlines that to this day claim dominion over this world are the progeny of this civilisation; equally they possess a mindset that is indicative of its fall from grace. I've come to think of an ancient power struggle that was won by a dark expression of the ancient esoteric science that this civilisation practiced.
The Inner Loop
In relation to the slave species of the gods hypothesis suddenly the theory has risen from an obscurity to a general awareness, could we be entering the inner loop of a long term entrainment cycle? Certainly, the longer and wider the entrainment cycle the more seismic the perceptual shift and this cycle appears to have been slowly tightening over a very long time frame. Does the tightening of the loop indicate that we’re entering some form of endgame?
In many ways the formation of this current cycle can be traced back to the work of Zacharia Sitchin in the 1970’s. Over the years several academics have called Sitchin out on his pronouncements, but Sitchin turned down multiple attempts to debate his translations. That’s not to say Sitchin was entirely wrong but it does appear that he merged fact with assumption and dare I say duplicity.
Below is an open letter from one such academic/biblical scholar. The man in question is Mike Heiser whom carries out translation work in roughly a dozen ancient languages, among them Biblical Hebrew, Biblical Greek, Aramaic, Syriac, Egyptian hieroglyphs, Phoenician, Moabite, and Ugaritic cuneiform. He has also studied Akkadian and Sumerian independently. He was invited to debate Sitchin on Coast to Coast AM by Art Bell, but Sitchin refused to accept the invitation. To this day he has an open invitation to any man or women to debate him and prove him wrong, to date nobody has taken up his offer.
The work of Zecharia Sitchin was brought to my attention in 2001, shortly after I completed my book, The Facade. As a trained scholar in ancient Semitic languages with a lifelong interest in UFOs and paranormal phenomena, I was naturally enthused about Mr. Sitchin's studies, particularly since I had also heard he was a Sumerian scholar. I thought I had found a kindred spirit. Unfortunately, I was wrong. Zecharia Sitchin is not a scholar of ancient languages. What he has written in his books could neither pass peer review nor is it informed by factual data from the primary sources. I have yet to find anyone with credentials or demonstrable expertise in Sumerian, Akkadian, or any of the other ancient Semitic languages who has positively assessed Mr. Sitchin's academic work.
The reader must realize that the substance of my disagreement is not due to "translation philosophy," as though Mr. Sitchin and I merely disagree over possible translations of certain words. When it comes to the Mesopotamian sources, what is at stake is the integrity of the cuneiform tablets themselves, along with the legacy of Sumer and Mesopotamian scribes. Very simply, the ancient Mesopotamians compiled their own dictionaries - we have them and they have been published since the mid-20th century.
The words Mr. Sitchin tells us refer to rocket ships have no such meanings according to the ancient Mesopotamians themselves. Likewise when Mr. Sitchin tells readers things like the Sumerians believed there were twelve planets, the Anunnaki were space travelers, Nibiru was the supposed 12th planet, etc., he is simply fabricating data. It isn't a question of how he translates texts; the issue is that these ideas don't exist in any cuneiform text at all.
To persist in embracing Mr. Sitchin's views on this matter (and a host of others) amounts to rejecting the legacy of the ancient Sumerian and Akkadian scribes whose labors have come down to us from the ages. Put bluntly, is it more coherent to believe a Mesopotamian scribe's definition of a word, or Mr. Sitchin's?
Zecharia Sitchin's work in other texts, such as the Bible, is equally flawed. This site bears witness to the sorts of errors Sitchin makes in language analysis and translation with respect to the Hebrew Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls.
What I've said here is very straightforward. It would be quite easy to demonstrate that I am wrong. All one needs to do is produce texts that I say don't exist, and produce verification of Sitchin's translations by other experts (that's called peer review).
Since I don't believe such evidence will be forthcoming, I wrote what follows as an open letter to Zecharia Sitchin in 2001. With Mr. Sitchin's passing, I now direct the letter (rewritten on Jan 1, 2011) to his followers and other ancient astronaut theorists whose views are, in many ways, based upon Sitchin's original work.
Dear Ancient Astronaut Enthusiast:
The intent of this letter is in the interest of research, not confrontation. In no way do I intend to impugn anyone's character. What I ask is that you provide answers and data to support your theories. Here are my questions / requests.
1.Can you please provide transcripts of Zecharia Sitchin's academic ancient language work? I would like to post this information on my website, and would gladly do so.
2.Can you explain why Sitchin's work on Genesis 1:26-27 overlooks so many obvious grammatical indications that the word elohim in that passage refers to a single deity (as demonstrated on this website)?
3.Can you explain why Zecharia Sitchin (or you in turn) have not included the comparative linguistic material from the Amarna texts that shows the Akkadian language also uses the plural word for "gods" to refer to a single deity or person (which of course undermines the argument that elohim must refer to a plurality of gods)?
4.Can you explain how the interpretation of the word "nephilim" as referring to "people of the fiery rockets" is at all viable in light of the rules of Hebrew morphology? In other words, can you bring forth a single ancient text where naphal has such a meaning?
5.Can you produce a single text that says the Anunnaki come from the planet Nibiru - or that Nibiru is a planet beyond Pluto? I assert that there are no such texts, and challenge you and your readers to study the occurrences of "Anunnaki" right here on this website. Here is a video where I show readers how to conduct a search online at the Electronic Corpus of Sumerian Literature website. There are 182 occurrences of the divine name Anunnaki. Please show me any evidence from the Sumerian texts themselves that the Anunnaki have any connection to Nibiru or a 12th planet (or any planet).
6.Can you explain why the alleged sun symbol on cylinder seal VA 243 is not the normal sun symbol or the symbol for the sun god Shamash?
7.Can you explain why your god = planet equivalencies do not match the listings of such matching in cuneiform astronomical texts? I recently blogged on this issue and provided a recent scholarly article on the planets in the Mesopotamian literature by experts in cuneiform as proof that Sitchin erred in this regard.
8.Can you explain why many of Sitchin's word meanings / translations of Sumerian and Mesopotamian words are not consistent with Mesopotamian cuneiform bilingual dictionaries, produced by Akkadian scribes?
Thank you for taking the time to respond. I will of course post any responses on this site.
Michael S. Heiser, Ph.D., Hebrew and Semitic Studies, University of Wisconsin-MadisonSource
One Step Beyond
Today I’m going to go one step further and offer the possibility that aside from being wrong, Sitchin’s translations represent a more nefarious perceptual deception. Could we be witnessing a misinformation campaign with profound implications? Are researchers (many of whom I respect) being drawn into a campaign that is slowly building towards a pronouncement that will alter both the fabric of society and our perception of humanity?
Is there a part of me that doesn’t want to believe that we were engineered as a slave species to the gods? Could my perception/belief be influenced by that? Of course! Equally as you can see with my opening argument, I’ve given it more thought than most and my opposing perspective is not a kneejerk response. Alongside the role of a sceptic I’ve also approached this as a proponent, researched it as a proponent and previously argued it as a proponent; still something just doesn’t sit right, it’s almost as if it slots into place just that little bit too perfectly.
I guess the next major loop of this entrainment cycle could be attributed to the “ancient aliens” television series. The ancient aliens phenomenon has its roots in the work of Erik Von Daniken and the aforementioned Zacharia Sitchin, but I believe there is a distinction that should be drawn between the two. At this point I would like to state that it’s Sitchin whom I believe to have been duplicitous, whereas I believe Von Daniken and many of the ancient aliens researchers very much believe what they’re saying. Indeed I’m certainly open to some of the perspectives that ancient aliens researchers have put forward and I'm not denigrating their work.
I’ve been watching the slave species cycle for a few years now, observing how with its every spin it draws in ever greater numbers of proponents. The concept has now pierced the veil of the public subconscious and is becoming quite the talking point. I’ve been watching and waiting to see if this cycle would be brought into a tighter loop that would connect seemingly unconnected dots. Over the last couple of years I’ve begun to observe how the puzzle pieces could come together and how a potential future narrative could be created.
So let’s take a look a few recent events that have sparked my interest. Yes I’m aware that the official explanations are going to differ to my hypothesis but still I feel they’re worthy of mention.
2016:The meeting of Pope Francis & Russia’s Patriarch Krill. In over 1000 years this is the first meeting between a Pope and Russian Patriarch.
2016:Pope Francis meets the Grand Imam of the Al-Azhar mosque. Again a historical first meeting between these religious figureheads.
2015-2018:Indeed in a series of world firsts Pope Francis has met leaders across the entire spectrum of religion and politics. Individuals that the Pope has met have included the Grand Mufti’s and political leaders of Istanbul & Egypt. During this time period the Pope declined an invitation to meet with the Dalai Lama.
2018:In another world first the annual Bilderberg meeting is attended by a Vatican member of state, Cardinal Pietro Parolin.
2017:Tom Delonge becomes president of to the stars academy. His team includes:
Vice President Operations
Jim Semivan is the co-founder and Vice President Operations of TTS Academy. In 2007, Mr. Semivan founded the consulting firm, JimSem1 LLC, after his retirement as a senior intelligence service member of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Dr. Hal Puthoff
Vice President Science & Technology
Dr. Puthoff’s professional background spans more than five decades of research at General Electric, Sperry, the National Security Agency, Stanford University and SRI International. Dr. Puthoff regularly advises NASA , the Department of Defense and intelligence communities, corporations and foundations on leading-edge technologies and future technology trends.
Aerospace Division Director
Steve entered the defense aerospace industry in 1978 after graduating from the Georgia Institute of Technology. After 31 years, Stephen is the recently retired Program Director for Advanced Systems from Lockheed Martin Advanced Development Programs – better known as the “Skunk Works”.
Director of Global Security & Special Programs
Luis Elizondo is a career intelligence officer whose experience includes working with the U.S. Army, the Department of Defense, the National Counterintelligence Executive, and the Director of National Intelligence. As a former Special Agent-In-Charge, Luis conducted and supervised highly sensitive espionage and terrorism investigations around the world. As an intelligence Case Officer, he ran clandestine source operations throughout Latin America and the Middle East.
National Security Affairs Advisor
Christopher Mellon served 20 years in the federal government, including as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence in the Clinton and Bush Administrations. In addition, he’s worked many years on Capitol Hill including as the Minority Staff Director of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
Dr. Norm Kahn
National Security & Program Management Consultant
Dr. Norm Kahn is currently a consultant on national security for the US Government, with a focus on preventing the use of biological weapons of mass destruction/disruption. Dr. Kahn had over a 30-year career with the Central Intelligence Agency, culminating in his development and direction of the Intelligence Community's Counter-Biological Weapons Program. Source for all names
2017:Following the formation of to the stars we receive a flurry of official (government released) UFO sightings, footage and testimony.
2018:Nasa reports evidence of molecules associated with life have been found by the Mars curiosity rover.
Now I’m fully aware that I could be off with some of the dots I’ve connected here but again something doesn’t sit right with me, momentum appears to be building but what is it building towards? Obviously many people are aware of the whole project bluebeam fake alien invasion scenario, but does a paradigm shift require such a dramatic starting point? How about a faux general consensus between politics, religion and science, is that what’s occurring now? Are the foundations for our perceptual manipulation being laid as I write this post?
I liken the current construct of our world to a giant re-education camp. I believe there is a long term agenda to disconnect us from spirit to confuse people and destroy the foundations of our humanity; the slave species hypothesis would certainly suit that agenda, but is there something more to this? Is there something that people are missing?
I’ve been following the formation of this new (old) world order for sometime now, twenty seven years to be precise. I’ve come to believe that at it’s rotten core, this control structure are deliberately engineering the events that are described in the book of revelation. I will also say that I believe there is more to this biblical prophecy than a NWO ticklist, but that's a subject for another day. If you take a step back carry out some research and look at world events objectively, you can see how all the pieces are being moved into place. Interestingly this endgame was recently mentioned by ex illuminate insider Ronald Bernard in the fascinating interview I’ve attached below.
When Ronald first came to public prominence I carried out some cursory research into both him and his business interests and he seemed to check out. I have yet to carry out any deep research on Ronald but what he is saying seems to correlate with my own research. Ronald recently gave testimony in the Westminster seatings of London for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ) Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Human Trafficking & Child Sex Abuse.