Shape-shifting, name-changing nuclear processing industry, Brit style.

in #education7 years ago (edited)

Windscale * Sellafield * Thorpe * Calder Hall. Call it whatever you like. It's all the same thing.

RADIOACTIVE.png

They sold us the idea of nuclear fuel to combat the looming menace of global warming. Now we are pretty sure that climate change is actually a normal part of Earth's cycles, why do we continue using dangerous nuclear fuel which remains radioactive for thousands of years?

One answer to this is their location. In the UK, ALL nuclear power plants are located in areas of high unemployment. Won't matter too much if we take down this type of population, eh. Besides, they're not as likely to be litigious. If you run a cost-benefit analysis, it's probably profitable to take out a chunk.

What is/was Sellafield? It's a randomly thrown-together site that reprocesses and decommissions nuclear fuel. It was the world's first commercial nuclear power plant to mass-generate electricity. In the early days, it produced weapon-grade plutonium-239.

SELLAFIELD.jpg

In the 1950s, there was a big fire resulting in Britain's worst ever nuclear accident. On the International Nuclear Event Scale the disaster clocked a Level 5 (the scale only goes up to 7). Shortly after the disaster, it changed its name from Windscale to Sellafield, an attempt to outrun the bad press. Windscale and Sellafield are just different names for the same beast.

In the early 2000s Sellafield featured again on the International Nuclear Event Scale. This time it was Level 3, a radioactive leak.

Countries as far away as Canada are affected by the pollution leaking from Sellafield. Scandanavia and Ireland too.

AMMO.jpg

Incidentally, there was a link to the mass shooter, David Bird, who'd 'resigned' from Sellafield after being accused of theft. He went on a bit of a rampage, killing 12 people and injuring many more. The plant went into lock-down that day, alerting employees not to turn up for their shift until the gunman was no longer active. Many rumours did the rounds ranging from brain injury to radioactive overexposure. Who's to know? But 3 of his dead victims were once employees at Sellafield. Perhaps there's something they're not telling us.

The very kind media took care of our delicate sensibilities, postponing some of their more violent entertainment: (Coronation Street, a soap opera!). Also a crime special on a panel game show. We can't be upsetting the public with fiction and game shows. Various artists, journalists and performers were also admonished during this time. No jokes allowed!

childhood cancer sellafield.png

Clusters of childhood leukaemia were popping up in the areas surrounding Sellafield, showing that there was double the risk of leukaemia in children in that area.

The ECRR 2010 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk goes into more detail. It discusses many issues within the nuclear industry, including problems with their peer reviewed journals; they circle jerk each other's papers for approval, rejecting articles that contradict their own agendas. This is a tactic to outwit genuine scientific consensus. Another illuminating point can be found in the 'Errors in published epidemiological studies of radiation risk'. For example:

In Wales, cancer cases have been removed from the database with the result that Sellafield effects on coastal population have been diminished or erased. After the Windscale fire, the direction of the fallout plume was changed and meteorological records were tampered with to minimise the effects on Ireland and the Isle of Man. In Germany, infant mortality records were altered to 'lose' the Chernobyl effect.

They also found some damning evidence in sheep shit, kids' teeth and autopsy specimens. Retinoblastoma (devastating eye cancer) rates were found to be high in the kids of Sellafield workers.

fisher gull.jpg

People aren't the only casualties, of course. Wildlife has suffered too. Fish populations are dwindling (conveniently blamed on overfishing), but the black-headed gull population has vanished from the Ravenglass estuary (near Sellafield) and fishermen don't bother with them at all. Even our wheat has mutated. Pesky fishermen! What will they do next?

MONEY WALLET.png

So, money! Nuclear fuel was paraded around as a cleaner, more environmentally-friendly, cheaper alternative to SCARCE fossil fuels. Read why that's bollocks @sift666.

According to my government, tidying this mess up could cost up to £222 billion. Yes, BILLION! Decommissioning and clean-up operations are projected to reach into the 22nd century and cost around £3 billion annually! They put this down to naïve science during the cold war and a bit of wear and tear! Source. Whatever. It doesn't sound like much of a bargain to me.

But on the bright side, they expect generate about £10 billion in income from 20015-27. Well played, CEOs. The positive spin is that they're able to drive these costs down in cases where the job is a bit more straightforward. Yes, because pimping out work to the lowest bidder always goes well, right. Also, there's a pretty and optimistic chart showing that technology is advancing (yay!) so we may be able to science our way out of this mess if we just science hard enough. This won't happen, of course. Big Money infests Science to its very DNA.

Anyway, according to the government, nextgen nuclear power stations will be built by the private sector. So, we haven't learned that maybe these things are not such a good idea. Maybe next time it all goes tits up, we can get to feel good, burning the incompetent commercial entity (well, its name at least) while mopping up the devastation in our back yard.

But maybe we won't be the ones to deal with it. A process called 'vitrification' takes radioactive matter and suspends it in glass which is stable for quite a long time (more stable than the liquid form of waste anyways). These giant lumps of glass are then buried as a nice surprise for future generations.

Good luck with that, kids.

sad kid.jpg

Thanks for reading.

Love
Anj x

akdivider celtic.png

Other eclectic articles

Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Woman: How far have we come? SPU Poetry Contest 2

Mission Failed: The Crime of a Friend

Six-word story contest #2

Naivety

How to find copyright-free images

And then I got a smack

Crafting

akdivider celtic.png

SMARTSTEEM

Minnow Bootcamp

Crypto Empire

Unless otherwise stated, all pics in my blog are either mine or freely available online (pixabay, wikimedia, pexels, flickr, public domain pictures, freestockphotos.biz, maxpixel), labelled for reuse and doctored by me.

Sort:  

I do not understand why there is still so much focus on nuclear power when we have much safer sources of non polluting energy like solar and wind now. Beats me, really

Thanks SVK. I agree, same. Probably if we follow the money there'll be an answer or two.

cheers
Anj :D

Sigh, that was the promise. It's really terrible we don't really have good solutions for dealing with waste, or sufficient safety measures for preventing these disasters and radioactive fallout. In the end the cost seems to eclipse the benefits of the technology.

One thing I'd point out though, yes climate change cycles are normal, but I'm pretty sure it's not disputed in the scientific community that human contribution has a significant impact to this cycle.

Good luck with that kids.

Lol.... Yikes.... Send it into space

Yeah, that's the problem. They rush into these things without first working out how to deal with any fallout. Idiots.

I don't know how significant human impact is. If you are talking about all humans as a group, I think it'd fall down to the 20/80 rule. Probably a small minority causing the most impact. Look at supermarkets... they use tonnes of unnecessary packaging (usually plastics and non-biodegradable stuff). Also, I can spend a good ten minutes, half a bottle of washing up liquid and god knows how much hot water to clean the peanut butter jar. I don't know how the maths works on this, but I think the average person, even the most environmentally conscious, doesn't cause that much net damage. Disclaimer: I don't know the numbers :P

Space: lol we've already junked that up. Have you seen that live simulation of how much debris we've dumped that's just circling the planet already?

I was referring to what we know about greenhouse gas emissions, but anyway, no secret that we are totally trashing the planet we live in.

I got to look that live space junk simulation up haha.

I need to find some good solid stuff on the whole greenhouse gas emissions to back myself up properly here. Remember reading that this is grossly exaggerated by scaremongering bodies. For example, there are groups that blame a lot on cow farts. Exaggerated. Also CO2 emissions. They show charts of CO2 in relation to 'global warming' without explaining that these naturally rise during times of higher temperatures. Anyway, maybe I'll blog about it when I get my hands on some proper science.

Enjoy the space simulation :D

we are pretty sure that climate change is actually a normal part of Earth's cycles

Wow. I didn't know that. Heard the arguments but didn't know it was confirmed. (I need to read more)

Anyway, according to the government, nextgen nuclear power stations will be built by the private sector. So, we haven't learned that maybe these things are not such a good idea.

I don't know about your country but in mine, as long as they aren't hit by the fallout, nah, it doesn't matter.

Yes, there are agencies out there that have an agenda. This is just one of their favourite narratives.

I think it's the same in most countries; the general population is not important. They do cost-benefit analyses and work out whether they'll lose/save money if they're affected. I remember reading about a car manufacturing company (USA). They were aware that a component in one of their cars was highly dangerous and would cause an explosion if the car was hit from behind. The part to fix this was less than $10. They worked out the cost of compensating the victims and also the cost of recalling and replacing these parts. It worked out cheaper to just pay the victims so they didn't do a recall. People have a financial weight and it's not very heavy, apparently.

Don't be cruel, where would people like Homer Simpson work?

On the other hand, they better improve staffing for nuclear plants, else Fukushima happens... too soon?

Undie is Homer! I knew he had a secret identity :D

lol too soon XD

UNDIE

...is probably the only one in this discussion who actually has any first hand experience with the subject at hand. He actually worked at a nuclear generating station. That being said, he pretty much agrees with Anj's Assessment. She is really only dealing with PROVEN After the Fact information, and past performance IS usually indicative of Future Results.
In the US, where the safety records are MUCH Better, these nuclear generators are extremely costly even if one takes out the price tag of dealing with the spent fuels. These fools are quite the profit-mongers, they ignore the facts that the "spent fuels" are still quite hot and could be used as a source of producing steam in a less efficient generation system. They seem to be overlooking many possibilities to be more cost effective while being more environmentally sound, and just going for the Big Bucks which are easier but much more risky.
There was a Canadian company that used a MUCH Safer Uranium Compound is a lower-level reactor, I remember the TV ads from several years ago. The music was "Funky Town" and it had simple animation showing the process. Never heard any more about that method or Company... Go Figure :P

FOUND IT!

AREVA

Using Uranium Oxide made from friggin' Uranium Hexa-Fluoride
Fluorine Gas is SCARY SHIT!!! wow

Hahaha the AREVA ad really tickled me. The nice zoom in on the disco XD hahah

Scary shit indeed :D

The Eurozone commercial is 46 sec vs 31 but the subtitles are also Francais as I recall... Fluorine can and IS safely handled every day, but I'm not wanting to be in that unit. I have worked in one that was shut down. Not Fun :P

Why wasn't it fun? Scary?xx

Undie is Homer Simpson? :D

Yes, if you wanna see how things are likely to go, know your history. I agree, they're only interested in squeezing max profit, regardless of risk.

Thanks for adding this extra info.

Lol Funky Town :D

Undie is Homer Simpson? :D

You are in SO MUCH TROUBLE when he sees this!!! :O

haha LOL DON'T TELL HIM! XD ;)

Nuclear fuel performs a fission reaction so that it releases energy in the form of a very large heat.The heat of the nuclear reaction is used to evaporate cooling water, either primary or secondary coolant depending on the type of nuclear reactor used.The resulting water vapor is used to rotate the turbine so as to generate motion (kinetic) energy. The kinetic energy of this turbine is then used to rotate the generator to produce an electric current.

Thanks lifesteem. That's how it works. This article is about the fallout.

There are some mistakes in terminology and it's not the "Type" of reactor used, it's the type of system. The difference is use of a Heat Exchanger, or Not. The system w/o a heat exchanger is MORE efficient, but then the turbine becomes radioactive when the primary coolant water is used to make the steam turbine loop. :o

Nice job, MBC. You could write a blog on the matter. Make the knowledge accessible to the likes of me :)

cheers
Anj x

Your Post Has Been Featured on @Resteemable!
Feature any Steemit post using resteemit.com!
How It Works:
1. Take Any Steemit URL
2. Erase https://
3. Type re
Get Featured Instantly � Featured Posts are voted every 2.4hrs
Join the Curation Team Here | Vote Resteemable for Witness

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 64359.49
ETH 2619.41
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.83