The Future of Human Identity

in #dropintheocean4 years ago (edited)

What makes up the human identity?

The basics of human identity can be broken down in many categories:

  • Cultural identity
  • National identity
  • Identity identification with the profession
  • Gender, sex, sexual identity
  • Religious identity
  • Ethnic identity
  • Identification with the conviction of identity

Perhaps a little confusion happens when we conflate identity with personality, however, a helpful distinction is that identity is shared with others while personality is not shared with others.

If we draw upon the above list of where human identity is pulled from in a lifetime, we can clearly see that identity is a mixture of these sources. These create our mindset, values, behavior, skills, attitude and external appearance . We might also add an additional layer under the social setting of childhood experience, family and social backgrounds.

Therefore, we can be fairly certain that a person's 'identity' becomes unique to them - a unique fingerprint, if you will.

To look at human identity from a scientific/academic viewpoint, this field of study primarily falls under the liberal arts field. Within this field of study, there are several sub-fields that make up individual branches of research and study.

(1) somatic field; (2) psychological field; (3) social field and (4) intellectual field

Of these four sub-fields, I am most fascinated with the aspect of 'soma' or the somatic field of study.

Somatics is the field which studies the soma: namely, the body as perceived from within by first-person perception. When a human being is observed from the outside -- i.e., from a third-person viewpoint-the phenomenon of a human body is perceived. But, when this same human being is observed from the first-person viewpoint of his own proprioceptive senses, a categorically different phenomenon is perceived: the human soma.

Much research and the study of human identity is from the 'third person' point of view. That is to say, from an observers lens from the outside. As I stated before, our individual identities are 'unique fingerprints' so I find a one size fits all list of categories in which to place the human being rather small-minded and limiting in scope. In other words, WE ARE NOT ROBOTS. This is a major contention that I have regarding those that consider themselves 'professionals' and their analysis of what makes a human being tick.

You also have to consider that the first person view of one's self is fundamentally different from the perceptionally limited view of the third person observation from the outside. Completely different realities.

For instance, the medical practitioner observes a person from a third person point of view and sees a patient.

This propagates viewing a person as an object in which to observe, analyze and measure just like any other scientific subject or object which can lead to misunderstandings in physiology, psychology, and medicine.


When we play the role of scientist and observe a rock, nothing thereby changes for the rock. But the soma that is being observed is not only aware of itself through self-observation but it is also simultaneously in the process of modifying itself before the observer's eyes.


In fact, to look at a human being any differently other than somatically, is to lose sight of the main emphasis of human evolution through self discovery and regulation. It is missing the point to 'life'. After all, this is one distinction humanity has over most other creatures - our ability of focused awareness, self regulation and modification.

The way a scientist sees the human being:

I would say the core of human identity is the BRAIN. If you transplant a body to a head the identity will be that of the head. ~ Dr. Gonzalez-Toledo


This mindset, of course, gives way to a very controversial addendum to human identity in the way of 'post-humanism' or rather the more recognized term, 'trans-humanism'.

According to, the following offers a summation of this ideological and emerging addendum or what I sometimes refer to it as Humanity 2.0.:

The post-humanist (sometimes called trans-humanist) views human dignity as a matter of seizing the opportunity to modify and enhance human nature in ways that include the deceleration or arresting of aging, genetic engineering, the bodily introduction of nanotechnology and cybernetics, reproductive cloning, and even the downloading of mind into immortalizing computers.


Post-humanism might have some valid and thoughtful points that could be positive. Could be! However, the implications for this transition would affect human identity in profound ways.

How does this relate to identity?

Consider these changes:

  • Expanded lifespan or decreased lifespan
  • Increased IQ, decreased IQ
  • Cure for most (if not all diseases)
  • Immunity for disease, non-immunity to disease
  • Creative acceleration, non-acceleration or absence of creativity
  • Customized genetic encoding
  • Turning genes on and off
  • Economics, industries
  • Newly emerging social, educational, governmental systems
  • Space exploration

Francis Fukuyama, proposed in his 2002 book, "Our Post-human Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution', that this would involve the inevitable commercialization of biotechnological innovations that could lead to terrible outcomes and worrisome human enhancements.

Francis Fukuyama argues that as a result of bio-medical advances, we are facing the possibility of a future in which our humanity itself will be altered beyond recognition. Fukuyama sketches a brief history of man's changing understanding of human nature: from Plato and Aristotle's belief that humans had "natural ends" to the ideals of utopians and dictators of the modern age who sought to remake mankind for ideological ends. Fukuyama argues that the ability to manipulate the DNA of all of one person's descendants will have profound, and potentially terrible, consequences for our political order, even if undertaken with the best of intentions.


One such technology which is gaining interest worldwide, is CRISPR. I highly recommend readers research this further in order to understand the scope of what this technology is and the implications of its use by an unregulated movement. At present, this is easily accessed and available for experimentation for anyone with a lab.

At what point does a human stop being a human?

Does scientific advancement necessarily improve the human condition or does it hinder it? Does this further the concept of the 'haves and the have nots'? Do more questions and problems arise and what of the consequences of altering humankind's identity in the constructs of historical bias largely dreamed up by a third person point of view without consequential accountability?

One can certainly conclude that since 1973 when the human genome code was cracked, we've been on this steady course moving toward a post-human future.

In fact, it might just be here now!

Gene-Edited Babies Reportedly Born in China. What Could Go Wrong?

As this is a largely unregulated and now cheap technology, we should look deeper into this migration and educate ourselves on the implications that will arise in way of cultural manifestations and moral perspectives. After all, technology is perpetually an assault on nature since it always involves its alteration through destruction.

However, I do see it's necessity in the advancement of humanity. For example, space exploration, cures for disease and mitigating the downward trend of human intelligence (IQ have starkly taken a hit). Just not the ideology that frames our use of it as an artifact that causes more harm than good.

“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity”–Albert Einstein

Given that the preceding explanation of human identity is primarily from a third person point of view utilizing the reductionist approach, let's dig a little deeper into the more interesting and inspiring first person, or somatic field view of human identity.

There is a general consensus among biologists that the body of an animal is being held up by muscles, bones, tendons, etc. However, there is an ever-growing body of evidence that would prove otherwise, or at least that this is only a small part of the whole.

Something that struck me as especially powerful was this statement in opposition to this consensus.

Despite the presence of these anatomical parts, without consciousness, the body will collapse on the ground. Hence, consciousness is a force within the body and only when it is conscious it will stand up and perform its usual activities. The moment consciousness leaves, the body collapses. The concept of awareness (an activity of consciousness) is of major interest for anesthesiologists, and in this branch of science, it is believed that unconsciousness brings the forgetfulness of pain. However, when patients undergo deep ether anesthesia, on recovery, some could not recall their surgery or the discussion, but some develop new psychological symptoms. In a while, after full recovery and under hypnosis, it is found that some patients recall the spoken word, identify speech, and interpret meaning. In some cases it may lead to life-threatening psychological trauma. In other words, in a living body, it is not just the molecules, bones, tissues and so forth that are all in all. The body has a foundation upon consciousness. ~ Bhakti Niskama, Ph.D

Further, Noble prize winner, Szent-Györgyi states:

I went from anatomy to the study of tissues, then to electron microscopy and chemistry, and finally to quantum mechanics. This downward journey through the scale of dimensions has its irony, for in my search for the secret of life, I ended up with atoms and electrons, which have no life at all. Somewhere along the line life has run out through my fingers. So, in my old age, I am now retracing my steps, trying to fight my way back.”

It would seem, at least from a somatic point of view, that we are not merely the sum of our parts but rather deriving life and identity from something far greater that seeps through all the layers that make up this human identity and mind. Something that animates this body and sparks the collaboration of chemicals and cells, bone and tissue that works cohesively. In fact, all living organisms share the same overtly noticeable goal-oriented activity (which includes self-determination, self-formation, self-preservation, self-reproduction, self-restitution). There is consciousness and awareness involved far beyond the basic tenants of

  • Cultural identity
  • National identity
  • Identity identification with the profession
  • Gender, sex, sexual identity
  • Religious identity
  • Ethnic identity
  • Identification with the conviction of identity

Your conscious mind holds your wishes, desires and aspirations. That may or may not be in your current list of identifying personas - these are arbitrarily received in sometimes anonymous revelations that help to redirect our course in life.


What a gift Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor has given us in allowing us a glimpse from inside her mind as an observer of two separate realities we draw upon for our identity. One being the sum of our parts and limited sense of self derived from our environment and the other from something much greater, numinous, that simultaneously occupies this space and every living thing.

So who are we? We are the life force power of the universe, with manual dexterity and two cognitive minds. And we have the power to choose, moment by moment, who and how we want to be in the world. Right here right now, I can step into the consciousness of my right hemisphere where we are—I am—the life force power of the universe, and the life force power of the 50 trillion beautiful molecular geniuses that make up my form. At one with all that is. Or I can choose to step into the consciousness of my left hemisphere. where I become a single individual, a solid, separate from the flow, separate from you. I am Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, intellectual, neuroanatomist. These are the “we” inside of me. ~ Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor

Personally, I don't think we can stave off the future of technological advancements and its effects on human identity. That genie is already out of the bottle, but it certainly does give us a lot to think about.

Additional Sources:

Modified photos used:

  1. Source
  2. Source

This post on the topic of Identity is just another 'Drop In the Ocean' for the wonderful BuddyUP group


I should of just put in my post
What you have wings said.

Haha brilliant I agree 100%

You would have done very well with this aspect of identity, however, I think your post and everything you covered pairs nicely with the aspect of identity I didn't dive into very much.

Initially, I was going to go into the vedic/holistic aspects of the study of identity but alas, the post morphed before my eyes and took on its own path.

There is a general consensus among biologists that the body of an animal is being held up by muscles, bones, tendons, etc. However, there is an ever-growing body of evidence that would prove otherwise, or at least that this is only a small part of the whole.

Scientists, under modern empiricism, will never be able to prove, in any way, that the human is not only the body. And that is because they start from a materialistic conception, and it is impossible that by studying the matter they find evidence of something immaterial. Unless they accept that to say that the only thing that has existence is matter, it is a totally arbitrary choice and that it does not really respond to any sustained logic.

The fact that the human is not only the body and that there are intangible things we have known for thousands of years. And to think that the only thing that exists is the physical world leads to countless aporias and incongruities of which we have knowledge since Parmenides and Plato. However, scientism has never been responsible for giving an answer to such things, they have made tabula rasa and ignored everything that does not fit in their vision, without ever giving an answer, simply ignored, not seeing reality as it is, and beginning to adapt reality to how they want it to be.

This will not give them any problem in purely physical issues, scientists will continue making advances in the field of physics and applied sciences as they have been doing, but the moment they seek answers beyond that, their knowledge will be totally useless.

If the human being were only his physique, we should say that the child me has absolutely nothing to do with the me of the now, and so with all people, because there is physically nothing that connects them.

On the other hand, the transhumanists start from a misinterpretation of evolutionary theory. They believe that human evolution has been a constant and linear progression, as if the world were meant to turn the human into an improved and superior version of itself. Evolutionary theory never says such a thing, in fact, the changes we see between us and the monkeys, which supposedly descend from a common ancestor, did not occur to become superior to us and inferior to them, but to adapt each one to its environment.

In such a way that, in spite of the fact that we place robotic pieces, there would be no progress at all, since the human physical qualities correspond to the environment. If we must change ourselves to adapt to the artificial environment we create, it is to be feared that the environment we are creating, far from being beneficial, is harmful to us, because it does not correspond to ourselves.

On the other hand, a few days ago, in one of your posts, I remember you mentioned Gramsci. Gramsci has an important concept that is "common sense", which is that axiomatic knowledge that people have, but that is not based on logic, reason, or anything, but simply imposed by cultural hegemony.

The fact that "we are continually progressing thanks to technological advances" is not a reality, it is an illusion, it is apparent to common sense, but it is not based on facts. Society does not advance at all to have more material things, the rulers traced the starting line and the goal, and told us that we are in a race. The advance in technology has been at the expense of many other things, however, the focus has been only on a handful, very small handful of things, to believe that we are progressing.

So far I see that I extended so much and I'm sorry, but it's a very good post and it has made me think. Regards!


Hiya @vieira;

I'm not ignoring you - I'm actually quite excited about your comment and jumping into discussion with you. I never mind thoughtful responses - just so you know.

Right now, my time is limited though so I might be a little delayed in writing you back...but I will! :)

Take the necessary time, really it's just a comment.

It's like taking a class when I read your posts hehehehe I always walk away with some new insight! :)

I really liked that quote by Szent-Györgyi - love that he proves the conscious awareness in our bodies as a force! hehehehe never thought about it that way!

As far as how far we will take technological advancements to the human.....
oh, that's an easy answer. Humans don't usually stop conquering a field until they destroy all there is. lol. (too pessimistic???? LOL)

but I believe as long as the human is alive - the human is human. I believe in a soul :) I know it is immeasurable - but I believe that's what makes it beautiful and mysterious and never fully-known.

so then that begs the question... if the human is being kept alive - THEN is the human still human? hehehehee

well.... rabbit hole time ;)

I do like rabbit holes :)

so then that begs the question... if the human is being kept alive - THEN is the human still human? hehehehee

It depends if you consider a human being a human being because of 'consciousness' or the soul. If you do not believe this to be part of the consideration then I would say, 'no' that is a biological robot or an artificial intelligence.

It really does press the boundaries though, huh? I've got a few more questions along these lines entering my brain right now. Interesting.

and yet, it's still a human intelligence
Artificial to me, would be one not organically derived, but designed.

hehehehehe rabbit hole activated! :)

Howdy this fine Wednesday youhavewings! Wow another brilliant post! Very thought-provoking too. I go with the argument that without consciousness it isn't human and without spirit there would be no consciousness. That's my simple redneck view of it but much of this article is too celebral for me! lol.

I completely agree with your thoughts, @janton :)

Hope you're doing well these days! Seems like forever since we've connected on steemit.

Howdy again youhavewings! I know, I doubt if it's been so long but steemit time is very different because of the way things move along everyday and it's hard to keep up so time feels like it's sped up essentially and a few days feels like weeks! lol. I did see your post a few days ago or last week that won the curie but I didn't comment on it because I wasn't sure what to say but the post was amazing I remember that so I wasn't surprised by the curie. You should time your long posts like that since curie can award your work. Maybe you are already I don't know. Are you spending more time on steemit these days?

have you read much of William Gibson?

No, but I just looked him up and he does seem to have some interesting and similar topics for his books. Thanks for bringing his name up!

This is him, right?

that's him.
I've read Burning Chrome, Virtual Light, Idoru, Pattern Recognition, and Neuromancer. He's a heavy read... this isn't some easy summer beach fare. It makes you think about the nature of thought, intelligence, and what it is to be human v. artificial intelligence.

Not to mention a commentary on today's Internet and Cyber world... (he wrote some of this 30 yrs ago!!!)

Sounds like either a guy 'in the know' or had some great intuition and foresight.

Okay! I like the sound of that. Which book would you recommend reading first? And be nice. LOL

Burning Chrome is a collection of his short stories. Depends on your lifestyle... if this is easier to get into with real life time limits... or:
Most people would say, Neuromancer is the place to start.
While I am not most people, I'll go out on a limb and agree with them.

Thank ya! The Neuromancer did sound intriguing to me

Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor's perspective helped me to understand a thing or two on the human brain. Just as you have put even more into perspective for me, thank you @youhavewings!

I love that video, too! It opens up so many perspectives - I more align with Dr. Jill's impression of who we are. I don't think we could have survived as long as we have without this higher operating system ;)

Thanks, charisma777 I always enjoy your thoughts and comments

Congratulations @youhavewings! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 10000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 15000 upvotes.

Click here to view your Board of Honor
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

Saint Nicholas challenge for good boys and girls

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by youhavewings from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.

What a gift Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor has given us in allowing us a glimpse from inside her mind as an observer of two separate realities we draw upon for our identity. One being the sum of our parts and limited sense of self derived from our environment and the other from something much greater, numinous, that simultaneously occupies this space and every living thing.

Some time ago I have read about her and was so fascinated. Completely forgot about her most valuable insights. I really have to catch up on this.
Thank you so much for reminding me of that. This is such a wonderful article, thank you so much <3

Sending a basket full of love your way <3 @youhavewings

@ravijojla, this is for sure a read you would enjoy a lot!

I'm so happy that you enjoyed this. I actually thought of you when I posted the Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor part of the post. I started to tag you in it actually. I think that if you're viewing her video from an experiencer's view, her words become especially meaningful ;) As well as the emotion she pairs with her story. Yes, very powerful stuff.

Thank you, @anutu and much, much love

Hey, @youhavewings I was brought here by @anutu to read this extraordinary post and he had right to recommend it to me.
It is a pleasure to dive below the lines and surf on the top of your thoughts.
Loved the time spent here!

Hi Ravi! I'm glad you liked it - I think we probably have similar views on the organic approach to life. I see the contents in this post much the same way.

Have a great day, Ravi Much love

We do, dear! I'm very happy with the fact we share similar views, indeed.
Love you back!

Touch on a lot of topics here sweets. Great write up. Think I agree most with


Posted using Partiko Android

Thank you @enginewitty

So true - all that needed to be said is WE ARE NOT ROBOTS

Thanks for the info, I guess you can be distinguished into smaller groups based on the different categories.

Posted using Partiko Android

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.06
JST 0.026
BTC 20345.66
ETH 1374.40
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50