The Three (And A Half) Pillars Of @berniesanders/@nextgencrypto Steemit Empire

in #curb2 years ago (edited)

A Warning ahead: Lot's of irony and hypocrisy coming..



The first pillar of @berniesanders Steemit Empire is his upvote bot business, which is been taken care of right now.

The second pillar are his activities as witness of the Steem blockchain.

For now, we can do little about it, but he is currently not in the top 20, which means, his payouts based on creating blocks is rather limited. When the time has come and it turns out to be necessary, there will be some action too in that direction. After all, so far he missed more than 1,000 blocks (in letters: more than one thousand). A rather lousy record, I have to say. But for now, he's good on position 51.

The third pillar is sort of an outrageous one, at least if you judge that by his own standards.

Bernie doesn't like it when Steemit whales are engaging in self-upvoting. There is an extended record with him fighting against @haejin and also @sweetsssj has been affected by his rage righteousness. Believe this outrageous accusation or not, but our precious snowflake @berniesanders is regularly engaged in self-upvoting to fill up and extend his flagging capabilities. That needs to stop too, or at least curbed to a sensible level.

But before we can do something about it, we need to know some more details about that.

On Steemworld, I looked at all imcoming votes for @berniesanders, his most active account (both articles and comments). Here they are:

AccountUpvote Worth In $ (Within 7 Days)Type Of Upvote
postpromoter92.84UPVOTE BOT
appreciator85.54UPVOTE BOT
smartsteem83.69UPVOTE BOT
booster68.15UPVOTE BOT
thecyclist53.91SELF-UPVOTE
randowhale52.81SELF-UPVOTE
promobot42.78UPVOTE BOT
thedelegator25.81SELF-UPVOTE
ipromote16.2UPVOTE BOT
yougotflagged15.93SELF-UPVOTE
steemservices10.22SELF-UPVOTE
ngc8.36SELF-UPVOTE
thebotkiller7.01SELF-UPVOTE
geoffrey5.97user
danknugs5.34SELF-UPVOTE
noisy4.87user
steepshot4.74user
theyeti3.7SELF-UPVOTE
rivalhw3.25user
sephiroth2.51user
unchainedio2.39user
jonny-clearwater2.35user
dineroconopcion2.25user
abusereports1.33SELF-UPVOTE
riskdebonair1.31user
firepower1.23user
tuck-fheman1.17user
all upvotes < 1$24.66user

I would like to point out that I don't have any grudge towards users who upvoted one of his posts or comments. That can be fanboys, sure, but it is very well possible that the upvote were completely legitimate and based on the content.

Here is the summary of all upvotes by type of upvote:

Type Of UpvoteUpvote Worth In $ (7 Days)Average Worth Of Upvotes Per Day In $
SELF-UPVOTE184.4226.34
UPVOTE BOT389.255.6
user56.78.1

Besides the fact that he apparently is at least on-par with @sweetsssj and her self-upvoting, these tables offer three important insights...

1. The popularity of his posts are rather limited, if you only look at pure upvotes by users:

8.1 $ is above average, but it is not unusual. This is perhaps the average of a user offering quality content on a regular base.

Without his witness activities and without his own upvote bot, he resembles less a whale, but more one of these little worms with flukes that swim in the Amazon river and crawl up your urethra.

Surprising is the absence of real popularity. This is another strong argument that he can be beaten.

2. Surprise, surprise, @berniesanders is heavily engaged in self-upvoting.

Something he is notoriously known for criticizing other whales and fighting them for it. I believe everyone knows Sein Kampf his struggle against @haejin and @sweetsssj and I am sure, others can tell a similar story.

This shows again that he is claiming the one thing while doing the exact opposite. A well known theme by Socialists. Or the variant in this case: He accuses others of doing exactly what he is doing himself. That is as boring as it is hazardous for every community.

3. Upvotes by bots are a very important source of income for him.

While it could be that other users like his content so much that they pay a bot for upvoting him, this deserves a bit of a closer look to see what's exactly behind these bot upvotes. After all, they are massive.

So, let's take a closer look at the big spenders for @berniesanders content. The upvotes went to an article he posted on Monday about Dmania, in which he criticizes the platform for enabling copyright infringement. But to that further below. Here is the list of upvote patrons via upvote bot:

Upvote BotAmount SpendUser Who Bought The Upvote
@postpromoter50 SBD@ngc
@smartsteem50 SBD@ngc
@appreciator50 SBD@ngc
@booster40 SBD@ngc
@promobot25 SBD@ngc
@ipromoteunknownunknown


The stats to one of the purchases by @ngc

As you can see in this list, @ngc is one of the side accounts owned by @berniesanders / @nextgenctypto.

Therefore again: Surprise, surprise, he's upvoting his own stuff massively to promote his cruisade (or maybe jihad?) against everything not fitting in his world view. But more than anything else, I have this question for you @berniesanders:

Why are you using 3rd party upvote bots when you have YOUR OWN UPVOTE BOT?

  • Are you maybe not trusting your own bot to get the upvoting done? (Should customers really trust your services, if you don't even trust them yourself?)
  • Or are you maybe trying to HIDE YOUR TRACKS, so you can still pretend to have a clean slate which makes it easier to slander and fight others who disagree with you?

Dubious, very dubious, I have to say...

As we can see, @berniesanders went out and bought external upvotes for a whopping 215 SBD from five upvote bots. But the sixth one, that hasn't originated from him. Somebody else must have really liked his article and gave him the upvote. Question is: Who?

Answer: His best pal @themarkymark (the 3.5th pillar) made him a little present

The more I am digging myself through these upvote bots, the more I find @themarkymark as owner of bots. He really is a big fish in the Steemit pond. By far bigger than @berniesanders himself. And apparently, he owns this @ipromote bot as well (others are @upmyvote for which he got a delegation from @berniesanders and @buildawhale). Not bad...


An attitude in the tradition of Wjatscheslaw Michailowitsch Molotow.

And so it looks like he got his bestie @berniesanders a nice upvote for his attack on Dmania. I cannot be sure about it, because there is no record of the usual combination of money+URL in the memo going to the bot, but there is a 35 Steem transfer to @ipromote by @themarkymark on that day without memo. Since the bot doesn't have too many other activities going, this is a strong indicator for him being the patron of the sixth upvote. Also on the same day, there was another 734 SBD transfer by @themarkymark to @ipromote.

Looks like somebody is trying to expand his network of upvote bots. And I do have to admit: It's the hell of a business. But to be honest, I have also certain doubts that the upvote business of @themarkymark will survive this...

A little sidenote on @berniesanders harsh criticism of Dmania

To spare you the clicking, here is a screenshot of the entire post:

Getting >500$ for this almost haiku sized brain fart is very generous. But after all, he managed to connect @ned directly to plagiarism - playing the good old emotional fiddle. Not everyone is brazen enough to do so.

While I don't even have a problem with the core of the criticism itself - plagiarism is a systemic risk to Steemit - I am wondering why @berniesanders chose this way of showing his opposition to Dmanias "support" of plagiarism, but doesn't do anything on his end to prevent such blatant stealing from being rewarded in the first place. I am not (necessarily) talking here about flaggging users who post this kind of stolen imagery, but I am talking about his upvote bot @randowhale.

He has both the power and capabilities to exclude posts from getting a paid upvote that contain a Dmania URL. Or he even could exclude all posts that only contain only an image without any or barely text! More than a simple scan of the respective post would not be necessary.

@berniesanders could totally do that and pass it on to other upvote bot owners to make it a platform standard, but nothing on that front either...

When going through his upvote business, I realized that a good share of @randowhale customers are exactly doing what he criticizes in his post. They literally steal some image on Google, add a title, post it and then go shopping at bernie's.

  • Why are you not preventing this effectively, @berniesanders?

  • Could it be that you don't really want to do something about it, because this would harm your business?

  • Is the classic public outcry maybe just a convenient excuse by pretending, you do something to improve the platform while EXACTLY KNOWING nothing will happen?

  • And what about your friend, the upvote bot tycoon @themarkymark. Is at least he preventing plagiarists from getting paid upvotes and therefore getting attention?

It doesn't look to me like that. You can flag me, call me a scammer, a @haejin soldier or like just before nuke me with "potential Nazi sympathizer", but not even you can change this:

"The blockchain never lies." (Quote, @berniesanders)

That counts for you, too, young man. And the more I look at it, the more it becomes visible, how pathetic you actually are.



You will find all my posts in this matter under the tag #curbyourbernie

Sort:  

Oh man, you should stop this. Bernie is ethic enough, There are a lot of other whales which are abusing the system.

You should appreciate him that he is wasting his VP on downvoting other people instead of upvoting his own posts/comments.

...you will realise that after more time spent on steemit.

The problem is that I have been caught in the cross fire of his rage often enough. And there are too many who had the same experience. Did you know that @dan left Steemit because of him?

He's just not acting rationally. Half of what he does is maybe good for the platform, but the other have are the actions of a psychopath.

Just look in the comments below what he thinks of "morons " like me and freedom of speech. He has confirmed to me often enough that he's only flagging me because he doesn't like me.

The status quo with bernie simply is not stable. This must change.

I think he is looking for the respect he never got...And man! Dan didn't leave Steemit because of him

Bernie gets a lot of respect, but at least the same amount of disrespect - both because of his behaviour. And he was at least part of the reason why @dan left.

The Golden Cobra has struck!

Bite Strength: 9.33% | Strike Speed: 64 Strikes/MS | Venom circulation period: 7 days
After 7 days.. The Golden Cobra's venom converts to SBD/SP! ;)
}} Hit placed by: @garudi {{

Send 0.001-0.008 SBD/STEEM + url->memo to @thegoldencobra for an upvote! :)
Service released: 3/2/18 - Give us a chance! :)
Check out the benefits of delegating/using the bot! :)
A simple upvote on this comment, will also help the bot grow! Consider it! :)

You got a 9.43% upvote from @brandonfrye courtesy of @garudi!

Want to promote your posts too? Send a minimum of .05 SBD to @brandonfrye with link in the memo for an upvote on your post. You can also delegate to the bot for daily passive earnings. Learn more here

You got a 76.05% upvote!
Please delegate us Steem Power & get 97% daily rewards share!
20 SP, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, 1000 or Fill in any amount of SP.
Click For details | Discord server

This post has received a 6.47% upvote from @lovejuice thanks to @garudi. They love you, so does Aggroed. Please be sure to vote for Witnesses at https://steemit.com/~witnesses.

You got a 4.22% upvote from @adriatik courtesy of @garudi!

This post has received a 1.39 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @garudi.

This post has received a 5.52% upvote from @msp-bidbot thanks to: @garudi. Delegate SP to this public bot and get paid daily: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP Don't delegate so much that you have less than 50SP left on your account.

Great post. This berniesanders just can't accept someone else take HIS prizepool, he can't understand steemit is not his own property but a community tool.
Bernie the raging hater will fail his crusade !!! (or 'jihad' lol)

this guy obviously has some severe mental issues and no life. it's actually kind of sad if you really think about it.

he literally has NOTHING better to do. his 10 steemit accounts are his life. lol. i'd love to see this guy in real life. i bet he's a non-binary gender queer feminist or some shit.

even more funny, he thinks 'stealing' memes is possible lol. memes were meant to be stolen. perhaps we can start a steemit fund to get this nutcase a counselor.

@doodlebear it's all good man. i knew he'd start downvoting me. I have another account or 2 anyways so it's not like he's accomplishing much. just wasting more of his pathetic time and votes. i love it.