A Flat Earther's Rough Guide To Winning A Nobel Prize - Much Ado About Gravity
Hopefully after reading my article yesterday, you are fully on your way to become a world famous, Nobel prize-winning physicist. However there is still much work to do, proving that the sun is only 32,000 miles away from earth and is a hell of a lot smaller than NASA shills would have you believe, is only half the job!
The thing is, in the flat earth model; as you obviously know already, you have to change how gravity works. Or rather you have to explain how it really works, and not how those NASA shills Einstein, and Sir Isaac Newton would have you believe.
Exposing Einstein
So as every flat earther knows, Einstein deliberately lied about how gravity works, in order to hide the truth that the earth is indeed a flat disc. This lie has been perpetuated with doctored experiments and empirical observations for more than a century now.
From the famous atomic clock experiment, to the LIGO detection of gravitational waves, a lot of people are putting in a lot of effort to hide the truth, and so now I'm going to explain just how you can expose the reality of our planet, and of course, win a Nobel Prize while you're at.
Win! Win!
So Einstein and Newton told us that gravity is an attractive force that is greatest towards the centre of mass.
Why is this important?
Of course you, as a flat-earther know, but indulge me for a second whilst I explain to my fellow ignorant globers.
If and it's a bloody big if; if indeed gravity attracts towards the centre of a mass, then if the earth was a flat disc, the closer you got to the edge, the greater angle you would have to lean at, to prevent yourself 'falling' back towards the centre of the earth.
In fact, the only time 'down', would actually feel like it was directly below your feet, would be if you were standing at or around the centre of the earth.
Think about houses on a steep hill, how the foundations have to be built at a greater and greater angle from the road, in order that the houses go straight up. Imagine walking up that street, how much you have to lean in order not to fall over. Well in Einstein's model of gravity, that's how you would feel, and that's how houses would have to be built, the closer you got to the edge of the world.
Funnily enough, you wouldn't fall off the edge, if you did manage to fight the force of gravity and go over, you would happily stand on the edge, as the force of g would now be acting straight down towards the centre.
Plus of course, a flat disc the size of earth couldn't survive in Einstein's universe, as the force of g would simply pull the shape into a globe.
Eyes On The Prize
OK, so Einstein was clearly wrong, as that doesn't happen when you go to Australia for instance, which is pretty close to the edge of the world. Because the alternative; the world isn't flat, is obviously too ridiculous to even give a moment's thought to.
Flat earthers know that gravity isn't actually an attractive force, and all we are feeling is the effects of the whole planet accelerating upwards at 9.8 metres per seconds squared (9.8 m/s^2).
The problem with that, is it doesn't really explain why the moon is orbiting the earth, I mean, if we are accelerating 'upwards' at 9.8 m/s^2, then presumably the sun and the moon, which is orbiting, or rather circumnavigating the disc are also accelerating at 9.8 m/s^2.
This does not explain their strange circular motion, on top of that, anybody with a half-descent telescope can observe the moons of Jupiter orbiting a round planet.
So there are obviously clear and present explanations for this weird phenomena, whereby the moons of Jupiter appear to be holding to the laws of relativity, and yet the earth is not.
OK, so it's that simple, just present the paper explaining this strange situation we seem to find ourselves in, and voila! Nobel Prize.
Uh-oh! Wait a minute! Just like yesterday, I've thought of another Nobel Prize for you!
What you need to do is explain gravitational lensing, which is an observed phenomena, whereby light is bent around a huge gravitational mass, like for instance a galaxy. Because Einstein as we know, made up general relativity and was hiding the truth, you reveal it and, voila! Nobel Prize!
OK that's it . . . Oh wait! There's more! You could get a third, yes a third Nobel Prize!
Huh, wha- how???
Simple, you need to explain exactly how if gravity doesn't exist in the sense that Einstein and Newton said it did; do stars form?
That's a biggie, because, again, without the help of those evil NASA shills and their hidden plans, anyone with a decent telescope can view stellar nebulae. Huge clouds of dust that gather together and collapse under the weight of gravity somehow accelerate together to form stars.
So there we go, explain that, in even the loosest mathematical sense, and I promise you, you will be bigger than Max Planck, Albert Einstein, and Stephen fricking Hawking rolled into one giant flat-earth bundle.
Hang on, I was just about to end this article and I thought to myself, there's another Nobel Prize that a smart flat-earther might want to win.
What's that I hear you ask?
Escape velocity!!!
Einstein's relativity states that in order to escape the gravitational pull of an object, you have to accelerate away from it with a greater force, hence the escape velocity of the earth, is around 17,500 mph, or so NASA tell you.
If we were all just accelerating upwards at 9.8 m/s^2, then anything with a greater acceleration could just fly off into space.
This clearly doesn't happen, I believe a bullet fired from a fairly powerful handgun travels at 1000 m/s^2, yet when you fire one up into the air, it doesn't just keep going and going off into space, it eventually falls down again.
So yeah, explain that in terms that people can understand, and I guarantee you, you will win your fourth Nobel Prize, you're gonna be knee deep in Nobels, you're gonna impress the ladies, or the men big time, they'll be beating a path to your door.
Further reading: Warning: More BS Glober Theories Backed Up By Plenty Of Evidence!
Projectile Motion: Mathbits Notebook
Hafele–Keating (atomic clock) experiment - Proving gravitational time dilation: Vintage News
Ballistic trajectory: parabola, ellipse, or what?: - .pdf
Lior M. Burko and Richard H. Price
Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 - Glober physics paper which proves why flat earth gravity does not match up with observable parabolas (clearly NASA shills)Einstein's Theory of General Relativity Made Simple (Clearly worked for NASA, decades before their existence; clever!)
Image citation: Bill Jelen for Unsplash.
Related Musing:
A Flat Earther's Rough Guide To Winning A Nobel Prize - Tackling The Sun Problem
Cryptogee Musings Contents Pages:
OKAY GUYS, I HOPE I'VE GIVEN YOU SOME DIRECTION WHEN IT COMES TO PROVING THE FLAT-EARTH HYPOTHESIS. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS COMPLETELY DESTROY AND REBUILD THE WORKS OF ISAAC NEWTON AND ALBERT EINSTEIN, WHICH SHOULD BE EASY AS THEIR 'STORY' HAS SO MANY HOLES JUST WAITING TO BE EXPOSED, SO GET IN THERE FIRST AND GO AND CLAIM YOUR NOBEL PRIZES!
GO, GO NOW, THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW! IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS SURROUNDING BOGUS GLOBER THEORIES AND HOW TO DEBUNK THEM, THEN AS EVER, LET ME KNOW BELOW!
The fun one I recently saw was after the recent Space X launch...said the rocker went up then turned sideways because there is a "firmament" up there that is like a wall and the rocket would hit it if it did not turn before hand!
Oh my gosh, that is just... I'm at a serious loss for words here! When I hear things like that I just think to myself that 99% of them must trolling.
Cg
You make some really good points. I can't believe it was so easy to disapprove Einstein when all the other scientists haven't. This is proof that the government is lying to us. They lie to use about the world being a globe. They lie to use about Canada being real. They lie to us about Wyoming.
Hahaha, yes the great Canada conspiracy, they're all actors I tells ya! :-D
Cg
Wyoming is real though; who on earth would want to make up Wyoming?
Cg
ROFL
It is the government brainwashing everyone because they keep all their government facilities where they keep the teletubbies and power rangers.
Flat earth? Ask SpaceX
Really interesting and literally speaking many times i hit with this question means how is earth circle shaped and i always ask question to myself as if i am standing straight then person who is living exactly downside where i am standing on the basis of map then he is also standing straight but possibly opposite to me means it will look as upside and downward but whenever i think about this question i only get one answer that earth is flat, so let's hope that one day we will get know the all the truth. Thanks for sharing and wishing you an great day. Stay blessed. 🙂
Maybe you translated my article, but you have lost the meaning my friend, I am showing people in a funny way, that the earth can not possibly be flat, it is 100% a round globe.
Cg
Ha ha, i just put what i feel means for me earth is not round or i have doubt if earth is round. 🙂
Well as you can read from the article, there is proof that it is round, if anyone can disprove the evidence, they will win a Nobel Prize, because the evidence is overwhelming. The next one I will write is about eclipses, a flat earth model can not explain them, a round earth model can. :-)
Cg
That's really great but in my opinion everything in this world is associated with "Doubt" concept means to reach the true reality we have to walk on millions of doubts and assumptions. But i am not saying that earth is not round but i am saying as i have an unproven doubt as earth possibly is not round. 🙂
It is only unproven to you because you are refusing to look at, and critically assess the evidence.
Like for instance I state above how gravity has been shown to work, by attracting towards a centre of a mas, hence if the world was flat, you would feel a greater and greater attraction towards the middle, the closer you got to the edge, yet we don't feel these forces.
So then flat-earthers say we are accelerating upwards at 9.8 m/s^2, if that is the case, why do things that we launch into the air at a greater acceleration than 9.8 m/s^2, do those objects fall back to the ground?
Like I said, the only way anyone can doubt the shape of the earth, is to completely ignore all the overwhelming evidence.
There is ZERO (scientific) doubt about the shape of the earth.
Cg
In my opinion there is still doubt that's why so many people are still researching towards it and you said right i am really not going through the evidence but thinking as per my assumptions, but i follow the videos of people who think earth is flat and try to understand their inputs because sometimes intuition is greater than evidence. But you are doing an great job and keep up the great work, but in my opinion everything is open for more research and exploration. Thank you so much for your inputs in above comment, it's really informative. 🙂
Well I'm convinced! Time to join the Flat Earth Society, which I've read on their Twitter account "has support from around the globe"... um...
In this post, you are completely wrong.
I mean, really. You need to go edit it.
Everywhere you use Einstein you need to replace it with Newton and Cavendish.
Anyway, it was Cavendish that lied about gravity.
And science has believed ever since that gravity is an effect of mass.
However, Newtons laws only predicted the path of Mercury to about 90%.
Then Einstein's theories predicted the path of Mercury to about 96%.
However, there is a lady who recently published her book that throws out Newton and Einstein and predicts the path of Mercury to about 99.9999%
Further, if gravity is based on mass, why does big G change so very much all over the surface of the earth?
And, that idea of cloud of dust collapsing and forming a star is mere speculation. It has never been seen. Further, actual observations have shown that stars do not have life cycles like we thought. With some stars turning to red giants, and then back.
Interesting times for people who want to do actual science.
You now have the above guide to win a Nobel Prize for proving them all wrong, go for it.
Cg
I do not know how you can start such madness when there are enormous many satellite videos that clearly show that Earth is not flat in real time
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvote this reply.
It all makes sense now! ;-)
My Friend @cryptogee, There are things beyond our knowledge. There are things that our beloved science can not solve. For example, how the f* can someone be so f* stupid to believe in flat earth conspiracy fairytheory in XXI century?! If someone could explain the reasons behind this and similar, I think that he or she bought to win a Nobel Prize.