I see your point, yes it isn't easy but why is it impossible. We can use many people, we have computers now. Ofcourse it may not be ideal but where is a boundary when we say "well it didnt work that great guess its impossible to reach expected results"?

Where are those good stuff? Are you talking about stuff that cost so much that normal people can't buy? Or you think stuff under capitalism are designed to last forever? Why would you do that? Instead of doing something that will work long time you need to build something fancy that will get old or broken quickly so that there would be demand for same stuff later.

"Supply and demand. IF you want to pay a lower price, and are willing to skimp on the quality there likely will be someone willing to provide you with that. That isn't capitalism's fault. That is yours."

How is that my fault? I am not the one who distributes wealth, if people were able to buy quality stuff they would do that, don't they?

The goal of capitalist is to maximize profit, so you need cheap work force and high price for product, you don't need to make something that will last long or care about environment, you don't care about anything but profit. So in the end you as customer get worse products for higher pay.

"In fact, if you look at soviet union it was known for having really shitty consumer products."
Such as?

"You are placing blame on capitalism for bad products, while not giving credit for the good products. You are very much cherry picking to try to support your argument. I call bullshit loudly. :)"

Call it whatever you want really, but are you refusing to continue this discussion?