Sorry I called you old lady.
I said it to try to hurt you out of anger.
You're not old, I was in the wrong when I said that.
So, yeah, sorry about the old lady comment.
Thank you, that's kind of you. I think we may have got off on the wrong foot because I walked in on you in an argument and got a bad impression of you because you were just in the heat of the moment.
I didn't see you call me an old lady because I don't usually read your replies after I've told you not to reply to me. The only reason I read this one is because I can only see the first line of your comment in my reply feed. I hope we can put this behind us and learn from it. I don't wish to cause you any stress.
Oh come on, first you destroy him and then you giving up? you having your period? Moodswings? Oh well, still love you Beanz, but next period, be open about it, so we can watch our words.
He basically observed that teenage boys are horny and you find that disturbing?
So by your definition, if I read an article that talks about underage sex, then the author is, "making sexual references to the kids" and you find that, "kind of disturbing" (your comment, 2:42 in the above video)?
Beanz, I know neither you nor Skeptic at all, but as an impartial bystander, it looks like you are being highly manipulative and I say this at the risk of waking up with a reputation of 2.
Did he deserve to lose his reputation for using strong language in his own posts?
Did he deserve to lose his reputation for calling on the _ickbutt bot in his own posts?
Did he call on the bot in other people's posts?
Did he deserve to lose his reputation because he comments on your posts?
Did he deserve to lose his reputation because he has different views to you?
I'm interested to know which of the above questions you would answer yes to.
I don't have the power to bring your SP to 2. I don't even have the power to bring you from a 49 to a 48, nor would I want to. You haven't been harassing me for weeks, and you haven't written anything offensive to me. This was a respectful comment.
Skeptic was disrespectful to me a few weeks ago so I muted her.
When skeptic comments on my comments and posts, those comments pop up in my Reply feed, and I don't even read them. I flag them because she's been told that I muted her and don't wish to engage with her after seeing her bullying somebody else.
I don't think she deserved to lose her reputation for any one of those things to be honest. But for a combination of them all, maybe. I am not responsible, I woke up and saw her reputation at 0. This website is different from others. If you're not respectful you can lose your reputation. You can check to verify this if you like.
@adm has an SP of
165,000 STEEM.
I have an SP of
580 STEEM.
You see the difference in size? She pissed off a whale, I had nothing to do with it.
The videos in which she refers to the kids as "horny" and looking to get laid, have absolutely no sexual context within them whatsoever so it's not because it's about underage sex.
Is that comment above the bullying incident? All I see is somebody reacting badly to waking up with no rep. People do react badly when they, rightly or wrongly, feel victimised, so it is wiser and kinder to only scrutinise his behaviour leading up to his losing rep. Therefore posting that was rather disingenuous.
It's a great idea to mute people whom you find offensive but sadly the mute doesn't work and I'm not sure that flagging is the right alternative, especially since you say that you never read the comments anyway. I'm sure that people reading your posts and commenting can make up their own minds. If your opinions are valid then they should stand up well to scrutiny and contradiction.
The interaction between the two kids pretending to be cats and rolling around together could be seen as flirtatious and I believe that Skeptic meant that the boy's goofing around on the girl's level was because he he was looking at the 'bigger picture'. Having never been a teenage boy I wouldn't know what goes on in their heads and I therefore would not discount or be offended by Skeptic's theory. So why did it offend you?
You say that you aren't responsible and your stats show that you aren't directly responsible, but your gloating in your video might lead one to suspect that Skeptic is right in saying that you are indirectly responsible: by enlisting the help of others.
My take on Skeptic's tumblr video posts: is that he is concerned about kids spending so much time, unsupervised, on Tumblr. He does have a colourful way of writing but I took it as tongue-in-cheek. (He was never really going to drink bleach.)
I never enlisted anybody. I've never even spoken to @adm. I'm pretty sure it's a developers account though in other words, dan or ned or somebody who works for them. I don't know but judging from that comment I presume that's who started the flagging to bring down her rep to zero, then I checked steemd and saw them 'unflag' some of them to pull her back up to a 2.
I literally woke up and saw her reputation a few hours before she did. (We live in different time zones) She probably opened steemd and saw that I was the last person to flag her.
I'm not gloating about what happened to her reputation. I'm gloating about not caring about it or earnest's threats.
The main purpose of the video is to show my side of the story. They have made several claims that I'm flagging things because I disagree with them. I want people to know that they can disagree with me. I won't flag anybody for that.
This all started over somebody else being harassed by skeptic. I didn't like to see that person go through so much stress over the things she was saying to him so I tried to break it up and in doing so I brought her attention to myself.
I understand that your intentions are good and you're just looking out for your friend. Skeptic has agreed not to post on my comments and posts anymore and I don't wish to comment or post on hers either (although I have to make the exception for posts that she writes about me).
I wish skeptic the best in her future posts. I just don't like to see other kids like her stressed out from online bullying and so I tried to put a stop to it. Maybe I didn't go the right way about it. It was the only way I saw fit, because in my eyes, the flag doesn't really hurt her, it just tells her I don't want to talk to her.
I'm just trying to help because the feud is hurting both of you and it's largely built on misunderstanding.
I feel that she should be being the magnanimous one and petition for you to get most of your rep back, as she has influence, whether she cares to admit it or not. Also, she needs to admit that her attempt at helping someone else just added fuel to flames and she either aggravated the situation for kicks or by mistake. Her actions from now will tell me, for one, who she really is.
Everyone should help to diffuse arguments, where they can, or Steemit will just end up like YouTube.
P.s I can't believe you have an account called, "mrcuntycat" Lol! You nutter!
It's good to step in when you perceive bullying and harassment and I haven't seen the particular thread where you stepped in but I've read other threads of Skeptic and he says
"fLaggot" rather than "faggot", as a play on words. If you mis-read this, then maybe @adm did too.
You said that you are gloating about not caring what happened to Skeptic's rep, rather than gloating because you were party to what happened, but you should care about someone's rep dropping so excessively- as this could potentially happen to anyone. I mean, it's not like he abused his power and tried to blackmail someone like that other guy, R4ken(?) is it?
Maybe he deserves to lose 10 points: so that he might learn, in future, to count to 10 before reacting to people. Like giving him a yellow card before a red one.
Do you know of anyway to petition adm? That might be a smart way for you two to put this behind you.
P.s. Skeptic is someone I followed because he liked my poem and I found his posts entertaining. I'm fairly sure he's not a she!
Sorry I called you old lady.
I said it to try to hurt you out of anger.
You're not old, I was in the wrong when I said that.
So, yeah, sorry about the old lady comment.
Thank you, that's kind of you. I think we may have got off on the wrong foot because I walked in on you in an argument and got a bad impression of you because you were just in the heat of the moment.
I didn't see you call me an old lady because I don't usually read your replies after I've told you not to reply to me. The only reason I read this one is because I can only see the first line of your comment in my reply feed. I hope we can put this behind us and learn from it. I don't wish to cause you any stress.
Oh come on, first you destroy him and then you giving up? you having your period? Moodswings? Oh well, still love you Beanz, but next period, be open about it, so we can watch our words.
He basically observed that teenage boys are horny and you find that disturbing?
So by your definition, if I read an article that talks about underage sex, then the author is, "making sexual references to the kids" and you find that, "kind of disturbing" (your comment, 2:42 in the above video)?
Beanz, I know neither you nor Skeptic at all, but as an impartial bystander, it looks like you are being highly manipulative and I say this at the risk of waking up with a reputation of 2.
Did he deserve to lose his reputation for using strong language in his own posts?
Did he deserve to lose his reputation for calling on the _ickbutt bot in his own posts?
Did he call on the bot in other people's posts?
Did he deserve to lose his reputation because he comments on your posts?
Did he deserve to lose his reputation because he has different views to you?
I'm interested to know which of the above questions you would answer yes to.
I don't have the power to bring your SP to 2. I don't even have the power to bring you from a 49 to a 48, nor would I want to. You haven't been harassing me for weeks, and you haven't written anything offensive to me. This was a respectful comment.
Skeptic was disrespectful to me a few weeks ago so I muted her.
When skeptic comments on my comments and posts, those comments pop up in my Reply feed, and I don't even read them. I flag them because she's been told that I muted her and don't wish to engage with her after seeing her bullying somebody else.
I don't think she deserved to lose her reputation for any one of those things to be honest. But for a combination of them all, maybe. I am not responsible, I woke up and saw her reputation at 0. This website is different from others. If you're not respectful you can lose your reputation.
You can check to verify this if you like.
@adm has an SP of
165,000 STEEM.
I have an SP of
580 STEEM.
You see the difference in size? She pissed off a whale, I had nothing to do with it.
The videos in which she refers to the kids as "horny" and looking to get laid, have absolutely no sexual context within them whatsoever so it's not because it's about underage sex.
Is that comment above the bullying incident? All I see is somebody reacting badly to waking up with no rep. People do react badly when they, rightly or wrongly, feel victimised, so it is wiser and kinder to only scrutinise his behaviour leading up to his losing rep. Therefore posting that was rather disingenuous.
It's a great idea to mute people whom you find offensive but sadly the mute doesn't work and I'm not sure that flagging is the right alternative, especially since you say that you never read the comments anyway. I'm sure that people reading your posts and commenting can make up their own minds. If your opinions are valid then they should stand up well to scrutiny and contradiction.
The interaction between the two kids pretending to be cats and rolling around together could be seen as flirtatious and I believe that Skeptic meant that the boy's goofing around on the girl's level was because he he was looking at the 'bigger picture'. Having never been a teenage boy I wouldn't know what goes on in their heads and I therefore would not discount or be offended by Skeptic's theory. So why did it offend you?
You say that you aren't responsible and your stats show that you aren't directly responsible, but your gloating in your video might lead one to suspect that Skeptic is right in saying that you are indirectly responsible: by enlisting the help of others.
My take on Skeptic's tumblr video posts: is that he is concerned about kids spending so much time, unsupervised, on Tumblr. He does have a colourful way of writing but I took it as tongue-in-cheek. (He was never really going to drink bleach.)
I never enlisted anybody. I've never even spoken to @adm. I'm pretty sure it's a developers account though in other words, dan or ned or somebody who works for them. I don't know but judging from that comment I presume that's who started the flagging to bring down her rep to zero, then I checked steemd and saw them 'unflag' some of them to pull her back up to a 2.
I literally woke up and saw her reputation a few hours before she did. (We live in different time zones) She probably opened steemd and saw that I was the last person to flag her.
I'm not gloating about what happened to her reputation. I'm gloating about not caring about it or earnest's threats.
The main purpose of the video is to show my side of the story. They have made several claims that I'm flagging things because I disagree with them. I want people to know that they can disagree with me. I won't flag anybody for that.
This all started over somebody else being harassed by skeptic. I didn't like to see that person go through so much stress over the things she was saying to him so I tried to break it up and in doing so I brought her attention to myself.
I understand that your intentions are good and you're just looking out for your friend. Skeptic has agreed not to post on my comments and posts anymore and I don't wish to comment or post on hers either (although I have to make the exception for posts that she writes about me).
I wish skeptic the best in her future posts. I just don't like to see other kids like her stressed out from online bullying and so I tried to put a stop to it. Maybe I didn't go the right way about it. It was the only way I saw fit, because in my eyes, the flag doesn't really hurt her, it just tells her I don't want to talk to her.
The picture shows you upvoted him for flagging me.
I only have one other account mrcuntycat. I have not flagged you ever.
I'm just trying to help because the feud is hurting both of you and it's largely built on misunderstanding.
I feel that she should be being the magnanimous one and petition for you to get most of your rep back, as she has influence, whether she cares to admit it or not. Also, she needs to admit that her attempt at helping someone else just added fuel to flames and she either aggravated the situation for kicks or by mistake. Her actions from now will tell me, for one, who she really is.
Everyone should help to diffuse arguments, where they can, or Steemit will just end up like YouTube.
P.s I can't believe you have an account called, "mrcuntycat" Lol! You nutter!
It's good to step in when you perceive bullying and harassment and I haven't seen the particular thread where you stepped in but I've read other threads of Skeptic and he says
"fLaggot" rather than "faggot", as a play on words. If you mis-read this, then maybe @adm did too.
You said that you are gloating about not caring what happened to Skeptic's rep, rather than gloating because you were party to what happened, but you should care about someone's rep dropping so excessively- as this could potentially happen to anyone. I mean, it's not like he abused his power and tried to blackmail someone like that other guy, R4ken(?) is it?
Maybe he deserves to lose 10 points: so that he might learn, in future, to count to 10 before reacting to people. Like giving him a yellow card before a red one.
Do you know of anyway to petition adm? That might be a smart way for you two to put this behind you.
P.s. Skeptic is someone I followed because he liked my poem and I found his posts entertaining. I'm fairly sure he's not a she!
Thank you for talking to her, if I did that I would be flagged.
You are one of me new steemit idols. xD
Yeah its still continuing, she keeps upvoting all her friends that are flagging me. its pure insanity.
I got a stalker, I always wanted a stalker.
yeah mrcuntycat kicks ass! =D he is in the window right now looking outside and chillin in the sun. xD
that is an observation of what was going on in the video, it is not making sexual remarks about children.