Buterin is Back and wants to change the ICO's work
Vitalik Buterin does it again, this time he wants to change the way ICOs work
In a new released whitepaper, Vitalik Buterin and Jason Teutsch tackle the creation of ICOs. The whitepaper details a potentially trans-formative protocol for initial coin offerings which has the aim to balance the capped and uncapped token sales.
The whitepaper focuses on the ERC20 tokens, so only on the Ethereum network.
If we see that two of the industry giants as Vitalik Buterin, who is the creator of the Ethereum network and Jason Teutsch, the leader of the TrueBit Foundation, which provides a verification tool for block-chains. More details can be found in the TrueBit whitepaper.
Proposition
No token crowd-sale satisfies that both:
(i) a fixed amount of currency buys at least a fixed fraction of the total
tokens, and
(ii) everyone can participate.
Source whitepaper
Solution
The new ICO protocol would give buyers the alternative to pull back the investment, while assessing the buyers's stake in respect to the entire ICO and adapting the bids accordingly. Also the new ICOs will be not capped in the initial phase.
Capped sales can reach tens of millions of dollars and sell out in a matter of minutes, leaving buyers unable to participate, disappointed, and frustrated.
Source whitepaper
Potential buyers may enter and exit the crowd-sale based on behaviors of other buyers, and in doing so tend the valuation towards a market equilibrium.
Source whitepaper
Buyers will be able to set the amount of tokens they want to buy at a certain price, by entering bids for the tokens. This type of transaction is known in the stock market as limit order. This will give the ICOs a direct market valuation.
Conclusion
The proposed protocol will, if implemented correctly, bring a new stage of ICO investment, where the big players would not be able to acquire the whole crowd sale for them-self and also will regulate the token prices to a more real market value.
Source:
The proposal also brings what is long existing in the stock market. It would let the market set the price and the valuation of the ICO, by setting up different scenarios of acquisitions, like it would the buyers choice on how many tokens he wants to buy and at what price, not the ones asked by the issuers. In the stock market it is known as limit order.
https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~teutsch/papers/ico.pdf
https://medium.com/truebit/interactive-coin-offerings-7b05db0ff77e
http://fortune.com/2017/09/27/ethereum-ico-vitalik-buterin/
https://www.coindesk.com/ethereum-founder-vitalik-buterin-co-authors-plan-iterative-ico-protocol/
https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-explains-flaws-in-icos-and-scaling-issues-in-ethereum
Let us know in the comments your views on this ICO and what ICO you are interested in.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely the author or analysts and do not represent the opinions of ADSactly on whether to to buy, sell or hold shares of a particular crypto currency, cryptographic asset, stock or other investment vehicle.
Individuals should understand the risks of trading and investing and consider consulting with a professional. Various factors can influence the opinion of the analyst as well as the cited material. Investors should conduct their own research independent of this article before purchasing any assets.
Past performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation.
Authored by: @alexvan
Interested in joining us? Come join our Discord server at: https://discord.gg/gXMH3qu
It is good to know that good coins are also coming. nice post @adsactly
Absolutely, you should check out the one I've been talkin about on my profile, CLOUT.
Big things coming to it, still early in the works and so much has already been done.
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@greenbuff/clout-crypto-s-new-home
There's simply now too much info to keep up with.. Thanks for sharing!
It's a useful suggestion. I'm not sure that's the biggest ICO problem to solve, but it will be interesting to see what people think of it.
It will help with the regulation of ICOs. Also scammers will have it harder, because of the withdrawal timeframe.
This post has received a 3.8 % upvote from @boomerang thanks to: @alexvan
@boomerang distributes 100% of the SBD and up to 80% of the Curation Rewards to STEEM POWER Delegators. If you want to bid for votes or want to delegate SP please read the @boomerang whitepaper.
This post has received a 2.6 % upvote from @boomerang thanks to: @alexvan
@boomerang distributes 100% of the SBD and up to 80% of the Curation Rewards to STEEM POWER Delegators. If you want to bid for votes or want to delegate SP please read the @boomerang whitepaper.
Am i here the first one to tell that your posts are super qualitative and i am much thankful to you that you have come up with such an interesting post ......love the way you give an point of conclusion of your post......
upvoted
This seems like a good solution. It gives buyers a better idea of what they are actually buying by enabling them to "bid" - and if they aren't getting a satisfactory price vs. the % of the token sale they end up with, their bid can automatically withdraw.
Sellers will still need to implement correctly - one key variable seems to be the cutoff of voluntary withdrawal. By eliminating "voluntary" withdrawal in the last third of the sale, it prevents whales from bidding some arbitrarily huge price and then withdrawing at the last second to secure a low price for themselves.
Vitalik knows that many ICOs are scam. But these are pumping ethereum.
I suggest Omise GO.
. Great information
This is a very helpful info. I appreciate your post
Thank you for sharing this information. Hope it will come into effect soon.
so what do you think of EOS? raised too much