Bitcoin Devs Build The Blockchain From The Foundation - Most Of The Alt Coins Start With The Roof

in bitcoin •  last year 

Although the roof seems to be the most important part of a house it is still smart to build the foundation and the walls first. Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency that is building the blockchain up from the base to the top, many alt coins seem to do the opposite. A proper blockchain is focussed on security and decentralisation first, and speed and fancy features should come later. Bitcoin is the only house in town with a proper foundation!

It is important to have a roof above your head, so let’s build the roof first!

roof.jpg
Most of the alt coins are building the roof first

Security is the main feature of every blockchain

Security is the main feature of a blockchain, an insecure blockchain is useless. Security is relative, 100% security will never be reached. It is important for a blockchain to reach an as high as possible security level. When two blockchains have exactly the same features the most secure one will always be more valuable.

This means that building on security must be the first priority, it will make all secondary features more valuable. Smart contracts, registration of assets, cloud storage or just payments, it all have to happen in a secure manner, the more security the better. Security of a blockchain can be divided in two categories:

Security of the funds

The entries on the blockchain (the funds) have to be as secure as possible. This means they are protected against theft and double spending. The level of this type of security comes from the hash power that miners deliver to the network. The more miners, the more security of funds on the blockchain.

Security of the network itself

Beside the desire to keep the funds safe, you also want to be sure about the network where the funds are issued on. Your own coins can be safe, but when the network fails, the supply of new coins changes or someone set the network rules to his own interest you could lose your value too. A high level of decentralisation is here required.

For security a blockchain need to become valuable

A PoW blockchain becomes more secure when the value goes up. Mining will become more profitable and more miners will be attracted to the network. This will lead to more hashing power on the network and will make it more expensive to double spend, censor transactions or change the network rules. This creates a positive feedback loop, higher security makes the network more valuable.

Store of Value is the most efficient way to attract value

Store of value users are the most efficient users to secure the main chain, because they demand big amounts of the currency (push the price up through supply/demand), don’t make many transactions (don’t put much load on the main chain) and don’t care about high fees (are able to pay the miners generously when block reward decreases). That’s why a blockchain focussed on store of value will be able to reach a optimal security level. Bitcoin is the ONLY blockchain that is doing this!

Easy accessibility and only voluntary changes preserves decentralisation

Beside the hash rate, decentralisation is also extremely important. To reach a maximal level of decentralisation it must be as easy as possible for everyone to be involved with as less as possible required resources and limitations. This means that some things have to be avoided on the main chain:

Big blocks

When blocks are bigger the total blockchain will contain more data and more powerful hardware will be required to take part in the network. More powerful and thus expensive devices are needed to run software and it will take longer to synchronise with the blockchain. This makes the network less accessible for poor people or people in areas with less infrastructure. When blocks become even bigger only centralised data centres will be able to run a full node. The Ethereum network is loosing nodes in a fast pace already, so this can happen fast!

Hard forks

A hard fork means that the network will be updated and everyone who doesn’t follow will be incompatible with the network. This means that users are forced to update otherwise they will not be able to use the network anymore. The occurrence of a hard fork means that big changes are easy to make and thus decreases future certainty (what more will change in the next ten years?). Furthermore, every hard fork the network centralises further because the ones that don’t want to follow the leader are punished and kicked off the network.

After the worse bugs that really threatened the Bitcoin network were hard forked out in the early years Bitcoin Core devs only wanted to update through soft forks as long as there is no emergency. Soft forks are backwards compatible, what means that users that deny to upgrade are still compatible with the network.

This means that soft forks are voluntary, you can still take part in the network even when you don’t want to use the new code. When only soft forks happen you can be sure that the Bitcoin you buy today is still the same Bitcoin in ten years and the network will remain decentralised because nobody is kicked off the network and upgrades can be used voluntarily, only if you want.

Additional features will be build on second layers

Increasing block space will always come with trade offs on security and decentralisation, so it is optimal to keep the main chain intact and use it only for the highest value use cases (store of value) to bring as much as possible value (= security for the blockchain) in the limited block space. This is the ultimate way to build a super secure and decentralised basis where the secondary features can be build on top of.

This will be done through second layers, where every possible use case of any cryptocurrency can be implemented in a separate network that drives on the Bitcoin network and benefits of the same security level and uses the same coins.

Failure of a second layer doesn’t matter

Most alt coins have extra features and thus more complicated code. The downside of this is that there are more attack vectors and there is a bigger chance for bugs. Also the blocks will need to be bigger what can result in the issues as described earlier. If implemented in a second layer it doesn’t crash the entire network when it goes wrong and the blockchain and security level can be maintained on the main chain.

Value of the main chain and 2nd layers will reinforce each other

When an extra 2nd layer is build on top of Bitcoin it will increase the value of the network overall and thus the security level. This in turn will increase the Value of every other 2nd layer and the main chain as well because they all become more secure. When multiple 2nd layers are rolled out it will be very hard for alt coins to compete against this network effect.

Second layers can be extremely cheap and scalable while super secure

Because the miners are already paid by the store of value users on the main chain, 2nd layers can theoretically benefit the enormous security level for free. The only time blockchain fees have to be paid will be when you bring funds in and out, inside the system fees will be tiny. Alt coins will need to pay for their security by network fees or inflation, both will be on the expense of the users. This means that 2nd layer solutions will be more secure AND cheaper than alt coins. Beside that the capacity is way bigger because not every node have to store a copy of the transactions.

Conclusion:

Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency that is focussed on security and decentralisation and thus the only building that has a strong foundation. The capacity and usability of the main chain will gain slowly through complicated innovation like Schnor, MAST and Bulletproof by the best devs in the world while decentralisation is maintained and security grows.

Second layers will bring fast and cheap payments, smart contracts and all the other imaginable fancy blockchain features with a higher security level and scale than alt coins while the value of them will reinforce each other. When this monster grows it will be harder and harder for alt coins to compete against the huge network effect and they will be eaten one by one.

Simply said, the main chain have to be simple, secure and decentralised as a foundation to build more complicated systems on top of.

Disclaimer
This is no financial advice, just my view on the market.

Never stress in a bear market anymore: Follow my diversification protocol

Store your Bitcoins securely
Ledger hardware wallet
Trezor hardware wallet

Trade Cryptocurrencies
Binance Exchange

Buy Bitcoins anonymous with cash
Localbitcoins

Protect your privacy with VPN and pay with crypto
Torguard

Buy gold securely with Bitcoin and store in Singapore
Bullionstar

Like this post? RESTEEM AND UPVOTE!
Something to add? LEAVE A COMMENT!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Very good points. SOmetimes logic is the best aha's

thanks for your post about cryptocurrency

I agree that a lot of alts are just flash in the pan to make the creator rich before he dumps the project. However, there are some other really good projects out there being build from the ground up. Take Cardano for example...all development being tested in a peer review process to ensure a fantastic working product at the end of the day.

Hey, @michiel this is wonderful post...and your photo shot is amazing...
thanks for share this post.

wonderful house..
it is perfect for a little family .

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Thanks for giving the chance to enjoy this beautiful news!!

You got a 17.28% upvote from @upme thanks to @michiel! Send at least 3 SBD or 3 STEEM to get upvote for next round. Delegate STEEM POWER and start earning 100% daily payouts ( no commission ).

if i can live there!
excellent place for living.

Great informative post.you are very lucky.thanks for sharing

if i have chance 2 upvoting i 'll do for you.

Thanks for your post.

download (3).jpeg

A true fact indeed, If this new altcoins started from the bottom (foundation) we wouldn't see half of them reaching the public...
What I mean is, many of this projects have good teams behind and skilled, but you won´t be very effective if you never tried to do the basics; Everybody is exploring and "abusing" what Bitcoin developers worked for.

This will, obviously, be translated in mistakes, that later cause problems like many hacks we heard about, miss functioning, etc...

I also agree if the main security in the handling of digital assets, because it is an asset that we can not save at home and need a network then it is better if many assets must also be protected with good security quality

Interesting post @michiel I like the roof and foundation comparison to Altcoins and Bitcoin

It was a very valuable information but I hope this does not happen so that the bitcoin will not go to eat the stemm and the coin THIS PLATFORM DOES NOT MISS