TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the last week (2019.01.28-2019.02.03)

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

6326 authors published their rewarded comments during this week.

7092 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

164054 votes were made during this week.

7860,85 SBD - is the total author rewards for this week.

---

TOP-200 effective comments curators for the last week (2019.01.28-2019.02.03)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@steemhunt	2579	147	1	571,49	7,27	13,28
2	@utopian-io	164	38	12	1052,96	13,39	6,33
3	@gentlebot	755	325	15	69,58	0,89	3,57
4	@magicdice	83	61	51	272,39	3,47	2,63
5	@nathanmars	430	150	4	79,59	1,01	1,89
6	@z8teyb289qav9z	863	118	3	80,05	1,02	1,49
7	@delso	950	86	4	79,04	1,01	1,07
8	@chbartist	340	163	9	35,65	0,45	0,92
9	@trafalgar	153	15	17	313,64	3,99	0,74
10	@ngc	574	61	4	74,58	0,95	0,72
11	@haejin	122	54	8	65,16	0,83	0,56
12	@theycallmedan	153	118	1	24,98	0,32	0,47
13	@realcleaner	469	72	7	25,96	0,33	0,3
14	@reflektor	252	114	4	16,6	0,21	0,3
15	@xpilar	558	137	5	12,8	0,16	0,28
16	@rok-sivante	109	20	80	89,46	1,14	0,28
17	@r2cornell	183	128	22	12,6	0,16	0,25
18	@steembasicincome	292	118	2	13,45	0,17	0,25
19	@fundition	14	7	100	203,56	2,59	0,23
20	@oracle-d	60	44	1	24,94	0,32	0,17
21	@jaki01	127	70	10	14,78	0,19	0,16
22	@ranchorelaxo	31	2	100	505,36	6,43	0,16
23	@ikrahch	349	133	12	7,43	0,09	0,16
24	@cjsdns	353	52	6	19,75	0,25	0,16
25	@smartvote	98	19	26	52,57	0,67	0,16
26	@sniffnscurry	190	28	5	36,61	0,47	0,16
27	@sultan-aceh	534	117	9	8,13	0,1	0,15
28	@organduo	244	61	5	15,78	0,2	0,15
29	@steemflagrewards	376	21	17	42,21	0,54	0,14
30	@crypto.piotr	440	196	18	4,42	0,06	0,14
31	@double-u	205	33	26	27,29	0,35	0,14
32	@adm	670	2	9	392,1	4,99	0,12
33	@fatimajunio	150	51	58	15,32	0,19	0,12
34	@rahemanali	73	49	100	15,44	0,2	0,12
35	@calprut	249	79	28	8,81	0,11	0,11
36	@tasteem	75	19	3	37,54	0,48	0,11
37	@acidyo	89	66	3	10,18	0,13	0,11
38	@czechglobalhosts	105	46	4	15,7	0,2	0,11
39	@balte	235	60	42	10,27	0,13	0,1
40	@shortsegments	186	54	17	10,77	0,14	0,09
41	@sharonomics	73	49	100	11,57	0,15	0,09
42	@cron	97	8	74	61,58	0,78	0,08
43	@gooddream	89	46	35	9,54	0,12	0,07
44	@glenalbrethsen	230	156	17	3,01	0,04	0,07
45	@hingsten	97	83	8	5,06	0,06	0,07
46	@berniesanders	574	60	4	7,67	0,1	0,07
47	@reiseamateur	139	73	20	5,47	0,07	0,06
48	@kgakakillerg	84	38	37	10,36	0,13	0,06
49	@bippe	122	86	5	4,14	0,05	0,06
50	@coingecko	52	38	62	10,16	0,13	0,06
51	@nanzo-scoop	23	10	73	35,57	0,45	0,06
52	@gamer00	181	79	9	4,68	0,06	0,06
53	@streetstyle	174	69	8	5,48	0,07	0,06
54	@tarazkp	193	86	6	4,14	0,05	0,06
55	@edicted	203	81	21	4,77	0,06	0,06
56	@ntopaz	278	12	2	29,93	0,38	0,06
57	@lotto-austria	131	63	36	5,37	0,07	0,05
58	@glory7	63	56	96	5,96	0,08	0,05
59	@bullionstackers	82	53	32	5,76	0,07	0,05
60	@quinneaker	61	16	57	20,1	0,26	0,05
61	@pinkspectre	76	45	93	7,03	0,09	0,05
62	@gank	63	14	81	22,04	0,28	0,05
63	@sbi3	85	53	17	4,81	0,06	0,04
64	@exyle	101	71	1	3,77	0,05	0,04
65	@noaommerrr	114	4	100	67,86	0,86	0,04
66	@shaka	34	28	17	8,99	0,11	0,04
67	@steevc	172	87	16	2,88	0,04	0,04
68	@lichtblick	155	71	11	3,61	0,05	0,04
69	@demotruk	16	15	95	15,5	0,2	0,04
70	@lyndsaybowes	130	67	22	3,6	0,05	0,04
71	@whatsup	187	83	12	3,38	0,04	0,04
72	@promisteem	33	12	92	23,46	0,3	0,04
73	@mids106	44	27	40	8,98	0,11	0,04
74	@brittuf	237	42	37	6,46	0,08	0,04
75	@bbana	60	38	18	6,59	0,08	0,04
76	@jungjunghoon	99	36	26	4,65	0,06	0,03
77	@majes.tytyty	152	50	7	4,37	0,06	0,03
78	@sbi2	79	51	14	4,32	0,05	0,03
79	@abh12345	131	72	9	2,69	0,03	0,03
80	@kerrywolf	149	50	28	3,8	0,05	0,03
81	@saramiller	48	8	91	20,34	0,26	0,03
82	@suonghuynh	29	1	97	158,54	2,02	0,03
83	@hunnybadger	59	15	99	11,4	0,15	0,03
84	@reazuliqbal	1435	142	3	1,49	0,02	0,03
85	@extrospect	48	2	100	88,97	1,13	0,03
86	@seo-boss	164	68	12	2,88	0,04	0,03
87	@himapan	299	53	6	3,29	0,04	0,03
88	@mightypanda	134	35	65	5,79	0,07	0,03
89	@mattclarke	62	34	25	5,08	0,06	0,03
90	@prosperist	73	49	100	4,39	0,06	0,03
91	@newageinv	82	51	18	2,08	0,03	0,02
92	@fulltimebot37	115	45	46	2,39	0,03	0,02
93	@fulltimebot19	122	45	45	2,5	0,03	0,02
94	@fulltimebot71	84	54	50	1,76	0,02	0,02
95	@broncnutz	54	38	2	3,56	0,05	0,02
96	@superhardness	82	1	94	138,29	1,76	0,02
97	@fulltimebot31	110	49	48	2,36	0,03	0,02
98	@artguru	53	43	100	2,81	0,04	0,02
99	@armentor	65	17	57	7,16	0,09	0,02
100	@michealb	144	38	3	2,66	0,03	0,02
101	@fulltimebot12	115	47	47	2,39	0,03	0,02
102	@fulltimebot9	118	39	48	2,48	0,03	0,02
103	@block-power	51	40	73	3,77	0,05	0,02
104	@phortun	88	45	35	2,29	0,03	0,02
105	@fulltimegeek	57	34	25	3,09	0,04	0,02
106	@vikisecrets	65	42	12	2,52	0,03	0,02
107	@dera123	253	21	28	6,89	0,09	0,02
108	@monajam	34	30	99	4,57	0,06	0,02
109	@onceuponatime	147	43	2	3,4	0,04	0,02
110	@fulltimebot34	116	44	47	2,46	0,03	0,02
111	@fulltimebot70	79	56	52	1,76	0,02	0,02
112	@fulltimebot47	119	42	46	2,46	0,03	0,02
113	@amosbastian	147	40	20	2,78	0,04	0,02
114	@d00k13	117	51	19	2,78	0,04	0,02
115	@benadam	73	48	100	2,37	0,03	0,02
116	@sbi6	44	39	34	2,54	0,03	0,02
117	@fulltimebot45	119	41	47	2,56	0,03	0,02
118	@steemchiller	49	46	86	2,29	0,03	0,02
119	@fulltimebot48	115	44	49	2,54	0,03	0,02
120	@sindong	122	46	10	2,57	0,03	0,02
121	@ulfr	78	13	51	10,59	0,13	0,02
122	@pixelfan	448	19	14	8,23	0,1	0,02
123	@fulltimebot17	113	43	47	2,39	0,03	0,02
124	@fulltimebot58	90	59	50	1,92	0,02	0,02
125	@sbi5	49	44	33	3,4	0,04	0,02
126	@fulltimebot7	110	42	48	2,42	0,03	0,02
127	@fulltimebot23	110	45	50	2,4	0,03	0,02
128	@fulltimebot46	116	44	48	2,48	0,03	0,02
129	@sbi4	62	38	22	3,81	0,05	0,02
130	@fixedbydoc	47	10	83	14,23	0,18	0,02
131	@jongolson	89	40	12	2,49	0,03	0,02
132	@fulltimebot11	111	44	47	2,34	0,03	0,02
133	@fulltimebot44	119	47	47	2,49	0,03	0,02
134	@fulltimebot32	112	46	48	2,37	0,03	0,02
135	@fulltimebot33	115	45	48	2,44	0,03	0,02
136	@adsactly	50	21	1	4,89	0,06	0,02
137	@mgranja	80	21	71	5,48	0,07	0,02
138	@dimimp	22	6	100	24,02	0,31	0,02
139	@fulltimebot20	112	40	48	2,42	0,03	0,02
140	@fulltimebot69	88	54	50	1,87	0,02	0,02
141	@stephenkendal	52	31	14	3,64	0,05	0,02
142	@fulltimebot60	91	56	48	1,82	0,02	0,02
143	@fulltimebot49	116	44	47	2,45	0,03	0,02
144	@fulltimebot67	86	59	49	1,83	0,02	0,02
145	@fulltimebot74	89	56	49	1,96	0,02	0,02
146	@fulltimebot28	110	43	48	2,45	0,03	0,02
147	@paul-gillbanks	40	29	94	4,96	0,06	0,02
148	@nigelmarkdias	133	38	52	3,06	0,04	0,02
149	@poeticsnake	41	22	100	5,81	0,07	0,02
150	@steem-ua	8	6	59	19,23	0,24	0,02
151	@fulltimebot75	86	54	51	1,91	0,02	0,02
152	@gardenofeden	51	4	70	30,56	0,39	0,02
153	@fulltimebot73	88	53	49	1,85	0,02	0,02
154	@fulltimebot62	90	58	49	1,88	0,02	0,02
155	@dswigle	167	63	45	2,03	0,03	0,02
156	@fulltimebot21	104	44	51	2,36	0,03	0,02
157	@fulltimebot43	109	45	49	2,42	0,03	0,02
158	@fulltimebot36	115	44	45	2,38	0,03	0,02
159	@fulltimebot35	107	44	48	2,31	0,03	0,02
160	@slobberchops	110	45	9	2,55	0,03	0,02
161	@fulltimebot10	116	41	47	2,5	0,03	0,02
162	@adetorrent	66	47	22	2,15	0,03	0,02
163	@fulltimebot64	90	59	50	1,92	0,02	0,02
164	@fulltimebot66	92	59	48	1,88	0,02	0,02
165	@fulltimebot54	85	56	50	1,84	0,02	0,02
166	@meesterboom	154	50	3	2,52	0,03	0,02
167	@fulltimebot41	107	42	49	2,37	0,03	0,02
168	@djohan	86	19	54	5,13	0,07	0,02
169	@fulltimebot16	110	46	47	2,37	0,03	0,02
170	@ericvancewalton	43	27	75	3,79	0,05	0,02
171	@frogcake	52	9	100	16,38	0,21	0,02
172	@fabio	152	31	10	3,29	0,04	0,02
173	@neoxian	85	26	5	5,35	0,07	0,02
174	@fulltimebot53	85	54	50	1,83	0,02	0,02
175	@bbooaae	69	59	41	2,68	0,03	0,02
176	@fulltimebot38	104	44	48	2,23	0,03	0,02
177	@supergiant	25	14	69	9,73	0,12	0,02
178	@sbi-booster	107	60	54	2,08	0,03	0,02
179	@cryptopie	123	60	13	2,59	0,03	0,02
180	@fulltimebot26	104	42	50	2,34	0,03	0,02
181	@fulltimebot29	107	45	49	2,3	0,03	0,02
182	@v4vapid	12	12	5	3,23	0,04	0,01
183	@xawi	88	59	29	0,64	0,01	0,01
184	@novacadian	66	49	53	1,84	0,02	0,01
185	@surfermarly	31	25	97	1,53	0,02	0,01
186	@edprivat	46	29	54	1,83	0,02	0,01
187	@toufiqurrahman32	352	221	21	0,27	0	0,01
188	@fulltimebot56	76	54	52	1,74	0,02	0,01
189	@fulltimebot14	109	38	50	2,43	0,03	0,01
190	@everlove	40	13	29	4,09	0,05	0,01
191	@nuthman	48	25	11	1,57	0,02	0,01
192	@andyjaypowell	96	45	22	1,23	0,02	0,01
193	@bananafish	53	24	71	1,91	0,02	0,01
194	@fulltimebot42	112	38	48	2,36	0,03	0,01
195	@dandays	51	27	37	1,41	0,02	0,01
196	@simonjay	255	24	21	2,14	0,03	0,01
197	@wherein	13	8	52	4,74	0,06	0,01
198	@nothus	36	15	49	2,69	0,03	0,01
199	@robertandrew	57	27	92	2,67	0,03	0,01
200	@canadian-coconut	33	23	2	4,02	0,05	0,01

---

I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity.
If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@dustsweeper	1508	338	5	30,16	0,38	1,61
2	@dustbunny	676	312	11	8,2	0,1	0,4
3	@boomerang	38	4	7	27	0,34	0,02
4	@minnowvotes	77	6	2	17,18	0,22	0,02
5	@treeplanter	69	6	51	16,8	0,21	0,02
6	@edensgarden	38	3	68	12,74	0,16	0,01

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

---

_{Sponsored ( Powered by dclick )}