Payouts with zero votes? What's going on here?
At first when I saw this, I thought it just didn't load correctly or something benign like that.
When I dug a little deeper into these seemingly free rewards I found out something a little different.
By using debugging I was able to determine that there actually is a vote. Steemit just doesn't show it for some reason, even though it shows the payouts.
In this case the vote was from a certain @animalcontrol. This account seems to be a spam bot, though I'm not sure why it would be upvoting random posts. Hoping for curation rewards maybe?
Why would Steemit not show certain upvotes? I would venture a guess that it has something to do with a history of abuse. Maybe Steemit put this account on a blacklist that says not to show their votes, I don't know. Whatever the case, I'm a bit interested now.
Have you seen stuff like this before?
If you've seen these hidden votes before and you remember where, leave a comment pointing me to them. I'll examine it to see who the voter is and maybe get some kicks. Better yet, if you know something about why this happens please let me know. Better still, do whatever you want to do with your commenting.
Thanks for reading!
Well, that's a theory. How can we test this theory? Pretty easy. We can use a different UI to view the upvotes. I do. I use Steempeak exclusively, and Steemit has no influence on or ability to conceal who might have voted on Steempeak. That disproves that theory. Steem is not Steemit, and Steemit is not Steem, any more than Steempeak, or Busy, or Kure is. The phenomenon occurs on other interfaces with the Steem blockchain besides Steemit, so Steemit can't conceal information on those interfaces, because they're independent of Steemit, not Steemit's subsidiaries.
It is the equivalent of having a Chevy in which the speedometer occasionally didn't work on a given stretch of highway, and then taking the same trip in a Ford, and seeing the same problem, and then claiming that Chevy is concealing something about that stretch of highway. Chevy can't do that to Fords. Something about the highway there, or the upvotes in our real world example, is being revealed by all the makes of UI we have tested it on. Since it happens on at least two of them, it's not those makes of UI themselves that are causing the phenomenon.
What makes you think it's random, and not targeted? How many other posts have you seen affected? If it's only me, It sure isn't random, and that would imply something I do makes it happen.
What makes you say those upvotes are from @animalcontrol? Just an assumption,or is there a basis for specifying that account?
What debugging did you do specifically?
Edit: also, since I am able to see votes that @animalcontrol has cast - as you yourself can see on this comment itself, your theory that those upvotes are being censored could only be partially true at best.
Disproves may be a little strong, and I'm fully aware of the difference between Steem and it's frontends.
Using a different UI is exactly how I found out that your comment had an upvote from @animalcontrol. The debugging I refer to was using breakpoints in the code of Sauna, my Steem frontend project.
If the highway is the blockchain since my frontend (which makes connections to public Steem full nodes) counted the vote then there is nothing wrong with the highway. It just happens that both the Ford and the Chevy are reading incorrectly, so to speak.
The only reason I say random is because I have only the one sample, and so I have no reason to posit a pattern. I suppose I have no reason to posit randomness either, but I'm fairly certain I've seen this happen to accounts that aren't yours. That doesn't mean it's random though, and some pattern may make more sense and have more utility than doing it randomly.
Thanks again for substantively addressing these issues. I reckon Steemit isn't making Steempeak do anything, and your own UI reveals that they both are doing something. What we haven't figured out is just what that is. I am nonplussed by the occasional occurrence of concealing the source of the votes. It is my hope that actual votes aren't being affected by whatever is being done, and not just for the sake of my wallet. I don't actually care much about my HODLings, but do care about the support for my speech upvotes indicate. I care far more about the impact of votes being affected by this mechanism on others, because many do care a great deal about their wallets, and if such is happening, I cannot even imagine how troubling that might be if it became known that something or someone was swiping votes.
It would destabilize the blockchain fiercely. We're recovering (well, at least moving on from) the debacle of Steemit laying off most of it's devs, and the general blackpill that delivered. We lost a lot of accounts in the last few months that I considered quality posters, and we'd lose many more if such is happening.
Nonetheless, if it is I want to know, because I'd oppose that mechanism with every tap I could produce on my keyboard.
Clearly, what I am now grasping is that Steemit is censoring the source of some upvotes, and I neither support this nor see any valid reason for it. Preventing spam is not a good reason to occlude the source of votes. Votes aren't spam, and I've never even seen an argument that concludes they can be. Inconsequential dust perhaps, but that's still no spam, and handled in other ways. Steempeak seems to be doing it too, but inconsistently, since I only rarely spot these cryptic upvotes. That is the weirdest of all, because I can't imagine a mechanism that only works to do that sometimes, and others does not - except perhaps manually doing so by a person that misses some.
I do really appreciate gaining insight into this issue, and I am probably more alarmed by this kind of censorship than you might imagine, because it's implications for the community may well be very profound, depending on exactly what is being censored, and how that's being done.
Thanks!
Well the actual votes are on the blockchain, and as far as I can tell seem to be acting normally aside from being hidden on some frontends. So rest assured (as you can from my word) that on the lowest level everything is working as designed.
I don't really think these upvotes in particular reflect support for your speech. It seems more likely to me that this is an automated system just trying to gain curation rewards. I'd like to emphasize my uncertainty here; I'm not sure what their motivations are.
As far as Steempeak not being as consistent, it might just be that whatever blacklist they may have implemented is less strict about what to censor and when.
I share your sense of being alarmed. Censorship is something I care about greatly. It was one of the big motivators for me to start developing a frontend. It's first working title was actually Uncensor.
Sadly, my internet access has been interrupted, and only with the help of a kindly neighbor am I able to reply presently.
As a result I am unable to actually dig into these matters myself any further.
I'd be very interested in a frontend aimed at censorship resistance. That was my reason for visiting Steemit to begin with.
Thanks!
Well keep an eye out for my next development post then. Censorship resistance is a central design tenant of mine, insomuch as I can facilitate it with a frontend.
Maybe even check out some of my older posts if you're interested.
Followed for interests.
Thanks!
That's one of those spam bots that has recently been removed from the interfaces because they have been commenting a shit ton on different posts, crashing Steemit pages when they're loaded. I don't remember who owns it though. Just a part of the Steem Whale Wars.
I would guess that however they patched Steemit to not show their comments also hid their upvotes...which is weird...
Steemit can't do that on Steempeak, which is the UI I am using. Something else is happening. Since the phenomenon is that the account that casts the vote isn't visible, what is the basis for claiming it is any particular account?
You said Steemit, so I assumed you were talking about Steemit. SteamPeak instituted their own patch to get rid of the bots from the comments as well.
I didn't say it was Steemit. @a-non-e-moose did. Please provide any evidence of your claim that either Steemit or Steempeak is censoring bots in the way you describe.
Sorry, I replied without clicking into the page and misread.
I'm guessing either they tried to fix it a similar way...or SteemPeak is based on the condenser code? In any case, the account in question is one of those bots that was patched to not show. I'm guessing they did it the cheap and dirty way and just deleted the name with some regex or something.
isn't evidence of anything. Could you provide some kind of actual evidence beyond your guess that someone did something that made bots not show somehow, somewhere?
The fact is that @animalcontrol just upvoted the comment of mine you just replied to, and that upvote is visible. You can see that for yourself. That's evidence.
I wanted to add here, that now I can no longer see @animalcontrol's name on the upvote I referenced above. That is weird.
This problem is troubling me. I am troubled because I came here to resist censorship, and this is censorship. That's a problem for me.
Because that's exactly what happened.
You must have missed the entire drama surrounding @fulltimegeek, etc.
The frontends have chosen to not show those accounts because they are adding thousands of comments on specific users.
Can you provide source for this? I was aware of the drama, even piped up trying to end FTG's flagging of @themadcurator, and had some of that nasty spam inflicted on some of my comments when discussing with LindsayBowes how she got dragged into the issue.
I took a few flags for it, but FTG has been supporting my posts and comments consistently before and since. I haven't found that to be a problem. It's odd that I do see most upvotes, and only occasionally see rewards pending without such a vote being visible. I can see why the spam needed to be dealt with. It was not merely obnoxious, but intolerable, and the intrepid can find my comments to that effect if they are willing to wade into that spam ocean, but concealing the votes doesn't seem at all indicated.
The fact that some of it isn't concealed, at least on Steempeak, is more confusing yet.
Is there a post or comment about the solution you could point me to?
Thanks!
That upvote from @animalcontrol isn't visible on Steemit actually. If you use Steempeak and it visible they must not be in perfect sync on this issue.
All the ones I say are hidden are hidden on Steemit.
THAT is interesting! I find it odd that the issue is intermittent. I hate problems that have that feature, like a car that works fine when you take it to the mechanic, but as soon as you drive off has the problem again.
There must be a pattern to it that can provide a basis for grasping what is actually happening.
This one has four upvotes! Again one from @animalcontrol, then 3 more from different fulltimebots. Those are @fulltimebot8, @fulltimebot18, and @fulltimebot22.
These are all abusers I'm pretty sure, but I'm not sure what to do about this. These votes are pretty substantial, and if those really are "full time" as the names suggest then it's certainly a drain on the reward pool.
The only thing I can think is downvoting the comments, but I wouldn't want to adversely effect @valued-customer, or other recipients of these upvotes.
Here's the vote info for those:
"active_votes":[{"voter":"fulltimebot8","weight":131191,"rshares":"81945650920","percent":6533,"reputation":0,"time":"2019-03-29T04:22:06"},{"voter":"animalcontrol","weight":287133,"rshares":"81821001317","percent":271,"reputation":"48428787253","time":"2019-03-29T04:04:42"},{"voter":"fulltimebot18","weight":78153,"rshares":"81950152515","percent":6543,"reputation":0,"time":"2019-03-29T04:24:27"},{"voter":"fulltimebot22","weight":78156,"rshares":"81951721871","percent":6544,"reputation":0,"time":"2019-03-29T04:25:21"}]
Since your comment was made at 2019-03-29T03:47:33, only @animalcontrol is making curation rewards here. Maybe @animalcontrol is owned by the owner of the fulltimebots and it's a scheme to earn curation rewards.
If I recall, I think I read a post about this kind of abuse from @enforcer48, or at least that account resteemed it.
Nothing about any votes being hidden though.
Well, I don't see how unsolicited upvotes are a form of abuse. If the autovoters are endowed with stake, they are deployed per the stakeholders wishes. If my posts and comments are upvoted by them, I reckon it's because what I say has value that the stakeholder wants to encourage. That's how upvotes work.
Are you calling all upvotes abuse, or all autovotes abuse, just the ones from FTG, or only upvotes I receive? You can easily ascertain if there's any quid pro quo by having a look at my wallet and xactions. You might also read a few of my comments regarding bidbots. I've never bought a vote, never pandered for a vote, and don't think I will.
What I do is speak my mind, and it seems FTG provides me incentive to do that. How is that abuse?
Them being based on common software like condenser could explain why more than just Steemit, and Steempeak as I've learned from @valued-customer, don't show these votes. I'll be right back with details on who cast the phantom votes on these two of @valued-customer's comments. It certainly seems to be effecting that account specifically.
This one actually has two votes, one from @animalcontrol again and another from @fulltimebot25. Neither show on Steemit, but I don't know about Steempeak or any other UI. Sauna shows them though :D
Here's an excerpt from the raw json response of the comment to help substantiate my claim.
"active_votes":[{"voter":"animalcontrol","weight":287147,"rshares":"81828420412","percent":271,"reputation":"48428787253","time":"2019-03-29T02:57:45"},{"voter":"fulltimebot25","weight":131186,"rshares":"81947792950","percent":6548,"reputation":0,"time":"2019-03-29T03:18:27"}]
While it's probably irrelevant now, I said I would make a comment here detailing the debugging process I used. Ready or not, here it comes.
The grey window in the background is Intellij, an Integrated Development Environment I use for java programming. The three lines of code highlighted in red are instructions for Intellij telling it to suspend execution there so I can poke around in the variables during runtime. These three lines happen to be right around where my frontend (the white foreground window) does the networking to get the data about a given post or comment. Sauna will stop running when it reaches these lines and I can look at the values of the data it's working with. In this case we are getting a comment on this post written by @valued-customer that begins with a quotation.
After I click the fetch post button, we get this. It shows the list of variables at the bottom for the suspended program, and their values. To take a closer look at the variable named "out" I simply click the View link to the right of it.
It pops up with a nice little window that contains the entirety of the variables contents. This includes the voter information in this case, and this is where I got that list of four upvotes I said were on that comment.
Painstaking may have been a bit of an exaggeration, this actually ended up being shorter than I thought it would. I did kind of go fast and gloss over some details, but if you were wondering about what I meant by debugging this is the best explanation you'll receive from me.
Good luck out there folks.
Thank you for that detailed explanation. I appreciate it very much indeed.
Dear @a-non-e-moose
I visited your profile just a moment ago to check your latest publications and I realized that you didn't post anything in a long while :(
Did you give up on Steemit ? :(
Yours
Piotr
Not at all :)
I've been poking around every now and then with comments and upvotes, but I've been taking more time for things outside the internet recently. These things come in cycles for me.
I'm glad to hear that @a-non-e-moose
Honestly it made me worried when I realized that you didn't post anything in a while. I've learned to value you a lot already and your work here on Steemit.
I remember you've been working on your own Steem front-end:
https://steemit.com/steemdev/@a-non-e-moose/i-m-working-on-a-frontend
Any progress?
ps. is there any chance that I could contact you more directly? telegram? email? I would love to keep in touch with someone with your skills and knowledge :)
Yours
Piotr
'Progress' may be a bit too strong, but not for lack of effort. I've been revisiting my project every few days when I have the time and trying to avoid burnout.
I have been eyeing a few cryptography books too, but I haven't had extraneous funds to purchase any sadly. Fortunately just 2 or 3 days ago I found a free download of the code examples from one of those books however. I haven't had much free time this week, but I did take maybe an hour or so tinkering with what I might learn from those examples. Hopefully over the weekend I'll have more time.
I'm also very glad you asked. It's a good motivator at least. Thanks @crypto.piotr!
To address your post script, I don't have telegram and you'd probably have better luck contacting me via Steem than E-mail. I did recently create a discord account, so if you're there that might work. I'd say that I'm more likely to check my E-mail even than discord though. All that said, I'm not averse to those other contact methods.
I would rather avoid posting my personal E-mail address or other such info permanently to an immutable public blockchain if I can help it, and I won't ask you to either. Instead, if it's not too much of a hassle, send an E-mail to [email protected] with any relevant contact info. It will still be visible to anyone who might look for a few hours, so don't send your safe combination or Bitcoin private keys ;)
Make sure to reply to this comment promptly after sending that E-mail. I'll be watching so I can catch it, and I'll reply to you from my own E-mail address.
It's not exactly exchanging one-time pads during a secret in person rendezvous, but it seems more private than posting that stuff on Steem to me.
Hello @a-non-e-moose! This is a friendly reminder that you can download Partiko today and start earning Steem easier than ever before!
Partiko is a fast and beautiful mobile app for Steem. You can login using your Steem account, browse, post, comment and upvote easily on your phone!
You can even earn up to 3,000 Partiko Points per day, and easily convert them into Steem token!
Download Partiko now using the link below to receive 1000 Points as bonus right away!
https://partiko.app/referral/partiko
Nie post!