You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Karl Marx - Chasing Yesterdays In A Modern World.
P.S. Are you REALLY sure about that Steem Power (SP) thing?? https://steemit.com/steemit/@mindhunter/why-does-steemit-need-to-reach-a-unanimous-agreement-to-hard-fork-like-ethereum-to-smoke-out-all-that-blatantly-pre-mined-steem
Yes. If by that question to you mean 'votes count according to stake'. Very sure. Reading this post inspired this post:
https://steemit.com/government/@l0k1/steem-is-not-just-an-ad-hoc-corporate-system-but-also-a-prototype-for-a-government
By the way, you provoked me by writing a Marx Fan Screed to write this. There is nothing about Marx's musings that could possibly have anticipated what we have now, and neither did Marx critique the problem of cronyism that is central in democracy, and I might be somewhat mis- or un-informed, but I believe that Marx favoured democracy. Well, I am not against democracy, if it is transparent (no secret ballot) and vote weight is indexed upon contribution to the pool of funds the government redistributes (taxes, and, note, for this also a blockchain based commerce system would allow the taxes to be automatically tracked, in every place they are applied).
I hope you enjoy this post I made, it is very relevant to this post I think.
Directly addressing that post about 'starting again'. I disagree. I think that when the rules are changed to address issues, the inequity rebalances. Starting again is very disruptive, why should the good people have to go through this when it's only the bad guys who do the wrong thing. I say, better that essentially the bad guys have to start again, once there is a system to punish them put into place.
Your post indeed is the identical twin to mine - thanks for pairing them up ;)
I like you l0k1 - but I'm sorry I can't follow you - I follow no man - shame!
me either, but on steem it just means watching them.
The l0k1 + mindhunter @ watching Steemit!