You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Karl Marx - Chasing Yesterdays In A Modern World.

in #anarchy8 years ago

The rentseekers use their money to pay for favours in congress. The problem is not the market but the market in deception and destruction, which is not a market, but rather a mutual aid network for psychopaths.

One really simple solution that I see is this: your vote is multiplied by your proportion of taxes paid out of the total. Just like how your vote is indexed against your SP versus the SP of the rest of the system. The middle class is being raped by taxes, but their vote means the same result as the masses of uneducated, welfare trapped individuals, and the wealthy who got there by buying laws to vanquish their competition also don't pay as much tax for how much they get back.

The yield on lobbying for laws to shut down competition have several hundreds maybe thousand percent ROI. And these scumbags run the media who get the larger mass of poor people's votes under their control which more than accounts for what extra tax they are paying. When compared not just total sum of taxes but also the income remaining after it is levied, the super wealthy cronies power is massively amplified.

The problem is the structure of consensus building in the governments. This one potential solution would massively change the situation... but good luck getting anyone to adopt it who has a say. This is why we have Steem here, as a demo version of what it would look like, and, probably, it's going to grow up pretty fast and have a remarkable economic power as a collective, compared to its size (because it favours the meritorious in the redistribution).

Sort:  

'a mutual aid network for psychopaths.' - I love that line!

Yes. If by that question to you mean 'votes count according to stake'. Very sure. Reading this post inspired this post:

https://steemit.com/government/@l0k1/steem-is-not-just-an-ad-hoc-corporate-system-but-also-a-prototype-for-a-government

By the way, you provoked me by writing a Marx Fan Screed to write this. There is nothing about Marx's musings that could possibly have anticipated what we have now, and neither did Marx critique the problem of cronyism that is central in democracy, and I might be somewhat mis- or un-informed, but I believe that Marx favoured democracy. Well, I am not against democracy, if it is transparent (no secret ballot) and vote weight is indexed upon contribution to the pool of funds the government redistributes (taxes, and, note, for this also a blockchain based commerce system would allow the taxes to be automatically tracked, in every place they are applied).

I hope you enjoy this post I made, it is very relevant to this post I think.

Directly addressing that post about 'starting again'. I disagree. I think that when the rules are changed to address issues, the inequity rebalances. Starting again is very disruptive, why should the good people have to go through this when it's only the bad guys who do the wrong thing. I say, better that essentially the bad guys have to start again, once there is a system to punish them put into place.

Your post indeed is the identical twin to mine - thanks for pairing them up ;)

I like you l0k1 - but I'm sorry I can't follow you - I follow no man - shame!

me either, but on steem it just means watching them.

The l0k1 + mindhunter @ watching Steemit!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 62296.59
ETH 2441.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.65