You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Connecting Steemit, scientific research and academia?
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the clarifications. My impression was wrong about the money. I read the white paper maybe a little bit too fast.
Concerning peer-reviewing and comments, it may be good to maintain these two separate. The reason is simple. I may have a couple of comments and questions on a paper and will thus write two-three lines as an answer to the post. Now, if I need to review a paper, I will most probably write several pages of comments (my longer review was 10-pages long... and was about a ~40 pages paper).
I will try to show myself on the chat and take part to live discussions. Note however that I am currently in vacation and not too connected (at least less than usually). Moreover, I am leaving in the GMT+1 zone.
Cheers,
Benjamin
Yes, reviews and comments will need to be handled differently of course.
The whitepaper is tightly packed, my main goal was to keep it short with a high information density. I start to get the feeling that I went a bit too far with that.
We're spread over several timezones, so discussions happen in slices anyway. I'm in Germany, so we shouldn't have problems to meet, just send me a direct message when you're there!