You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Writing, walls, cases
Hmm. I quite like the way this conversation is going, though I'd have preferred if it had a bit more... evil to it. You really have to capture John's personality.
And for some reason, all I can think right now is You have a lot of gall calling a gal a gall, it's rather galling in fact, or more accurately gal'ing.
Hard to make someone really evil if he isn't, and I would love to talk more about John's level of evilness, butt my thoughts are more in my ass.
Makes one wonder about the etymology of the word gal. I'm happy I made this spelling mistake. Without it, your comment to my comment and my comment to your comment to my comment would have been something entirely else. Can't wait to see your comment to my comment to your comment to my comment.
I'm curious why you like my comment to your comment to my comment about your comment which happens to have been commenting on commentation was attempting to twist my mind and trick me into double-crossing the double crossed double-crosser and maybe cross the street again, or just do another one on the old Son and get a double crossing.
Be that as it may.
Sounds interesting. Care to expound?
Because.
I like the words you choose and how you put them together. One after another.
It's nonexistent.