You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: I support #womenspeakout #teamgirlpowa 100% OF THE SBD PAYOUT OF THIS POST DONATED TO @TEAMGIRLPOWA
Ok let me put on my giving fux hat later. Right now I'm going back to sleep knowing that my work for women on the blockchain and in the world is understood and going to be welcomed by someone on the blockchain. Just not you noted. Ttfn
you rock @limabeing
So you have no idea what you're talking about, got it. And I got issue with women anywhere. I got an issue with feminists anywhere, especially male feminists.
The funny thing is you are proving a point to so many women that even if you focus on positivity, the haters will show up.
Since you asked so nicely. Here is further explanation of "drunk sex and shit"
"The typology that guides the classification of sexual assault in the CSA Study is based on how the assault (or attempted assault) was achieved. Virtually all sexual assault research distinguishes between assaults occurring as a result of physical force (or threats of physical force) from assaults that do not involve the use or threat of force; the CSA Study similarly considers physically forced sexual assault as a distinct category of assault. Another means through which sexual assault is achieved is incapacitation of the victim. Legal definitions of sexual assault factor in one’s ability to provide consent, and individuals who are incapacitated because of the effects of alcohol or drugs (or otherwise incapacitated, such as when they are unconscious or asleep) are incapable of consenting. In the CSA Study, we consider as incapacitated sexual assault any unwanted sexual contact occurring when a victim is unable to provide consent or stop what is happening because she is passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated, or asleep, regardless of whether the perpetrator was responsible for her substance use or whether substances were administered without her knowledge. We break down incapacitated sexual assault into four subtypes. The first two subtypes pertain to sexual assaults achieved when the victim is given—without her knowledge or consent—a substance that physically incapacitates her and makes her incapable of providing consent. DFSA (drug-facilitated sexual assault) is defined as unwanted sexual contact occurring when the victim is incapacitated and unable to provide consent after she had been given a drug without her knowledge or consent. Incidents classified as DFSA are those in which the victim is certain that she had been drugged. In contrast, SDFSA (suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault) is defined as incapacitated sexual assault occurring after the victim suspects that she had been given a drug without her knowledge or consent. The third type of incapacitated sexual assault considered in the CSA Study is termed alcohol and/or other drug- (AOD-) enabled sexual assault. This subtype includes unwanted sexual contact occurring when the victim is incapacitated and unable to provide consent because of voluntary consumption of alcohol or other drugs. Finally, to distinguish between incapacitation due to the effects of AOD (administered either coercively or voluntarily) and other types of incapacitation, we include a fourth type of incapacitated sexual assault in our typology. Other incapacitated sexual assaults capture the remaining, and likely uncommon, situations in which a victim can be incapacitated, such as by being asleep or unconscious."
Can you imagine, having so many variables of classication for how to fuck a man non-consenually? Maybe you have your own data on that. Why is it this way? because no one believes us
All we want is to live our lives without discrimination and harrassment and with a true chance for respect. I'm sorry you have issues. But you are missing out cuz @carlgnash is an amazing human! Even before i knew how hardcore he was. I hope you find something else that makes you feel better about how our movement and the work we are doing to support women on the blockchain negatively effects you.
:)
Did you bother to red the quote? Here it is again
"Sixty-eight women (1.4% of the sample) were victims of forced sexual assault both before and since entering college, and 140 women (2.5% of the sample) were victims of incapacitated sexual assault both before and since entering college (data not shown)." - 2.5% have suffered incapacitated rape, and 1.4% was under duress. The rest, meaning 96.1% is garbage.
I never said he's a shit human, or anything. I talked about the post, you brought him in. And the post is garbage, regardless of other attributes of its poster.
And feminism has nothing to do with equality and lack of discrimination. That has already been illegal everywhere in the western world for decades at least.
I'll look further into it later but "I'm fairly sure you aren't concerned with my opinion or anyones opinion other than your own. You think the post is garbage and you have issues with male feminists. Point made. As for the data being untrue I'me still looking for your counter data other than misquoting the information and assuming you know how to read data better than a gov entity. If you cant beleive that women are still treated unfairly and not equally represnted Then im not going to convince you. I gotta go to work.
Last thing-- im not only doing this for western women and neither is Carl. But thats something others will see and you will probably miss. Welcome to the new era of #feminism
I don't give a shit about anyone's opinion, I care about facts. And this post, as well as your opinion is based of false statistics which led you to a wrong conclusion. And I'm assuming naivite, rather than malice here.
Your assumptions arent fitting of my actual state. I understand that your mind is focused on what you are sure you know based on what you are sure you read. However, not giving a shit about peoples opinions does make it hard to have an honest and authentic conversation. You have been on attack. I am doing my best.
I'm attacking an idea, not people, though people maliciously spreading bad ideas are not free from attack, which from what I gather is not your case, hence I believe you to be misinformed. And no, I don't care about your, or anyone's emotions. I'm discussing facts. It's as honest as it gets.
And yes, I'm sure that everywhere in the 1st and 2nd world rape is illegal and carries some of the highest penalty there is. I frankly, would go even further when it comes to serial rapists or child molesters, and wouldn't bother imprisoning them. Just shoot them, and be done with it. A bullet is much cheaper than a lifetime of caring for them. But flirting, catcalling, playful touching or drunk sex is not rape or harassment.
You are attacking us and specifically you are trolling a very positive and loving post.
I've given you too much respect. I hope your heart opens soon and finds the wonders honoring someone elses experience. You will be ok. I promise.