You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Repost: Fearless Adversarial Journalism Doesn’t Work When You Are Funded By A Billionaire

in #wikileaks7 years ago

This was always going to be the result. When you have people (Omidyar) who are working 'with' a system that is rotten to the core, they are only there to prop up and perpetuate the cause of the ruling classes. The writing was on the wall from the beginning. The opinions and views of the journalists are irrelevant to Omidyar. He only cares about building a brand name and influence. When you work for an organisation that has an agenda (whether hidden or not), the journalists will be compromised into a position whether they like, or agree with it or not. You cannot be independent while working for a plutocrat, who believes in the top/down model of compartmentalisation.

Sort:  

It's true, and it's sad, (I mean genuinely disheartening) that the Intercept was born with this type of defect in its makeup because I do think individuals there including Greenwald are legitimate.

This is the best summup of the situation as I see it, [cliche advisory warning]:

Screen Shot 2018-02-18 at 8.59.21 PM.png

[cliche advisory warning] LOL

Can't quote Yeats without one! But those last two lines summup everything wrong with The Intercept right now.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.21
JST 0.036
BTC 98546.61
ETH 3370.70
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.14