You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Wikileaks & Assange - Hero or Dis-Info Agent? (Part 2)

in #wikileaks • 7 years ago

When you begin your argument with a detailed analysis of an obscure nickname that some 16yo kid gave himself when he was 16, it destroys your credibility from the start.

7 years ago in #wikileaks by
$0.00
    Reply 1
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago 

    I'm not sure what my credibility has to do with it? I've presented evidence and sources.

    I am writing a series, this was part 2 - cherry-picking one point is kinda missing the whole point.

    In both of my posts I wrote:

    Some of the points that I have raised in this post are less important, or credible than others. I am merely presenting the pertinent evidence that I have discovered with you - it is up to you, the jury to arrive at a verdict.

    If one piece of evidence is not convincing - that does not mean that all of the other evidence is invalid.

    As always, do not trust anyone, (including me) - always do your own research and don’t let anyone tell you what to believe.

    I'm curious - have you read all of part 1 and part 2? Are you going to read the rest of the series?

    $0.02
    • Past Payouts $0.02, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.02, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.01, 0.00 TRX
    1 vote
    Reply

    Coin Marketplace

    STEEM 0.21
    TRX 0.13
    JST 0.030
    BTC 67083.87
    ETH 3502.60
    USDT 1.00
    SBD 3.13