Downvoting (like Bot-voting) is part of the game... I wouldn't take either too seriously at this stage of STEEM's development.

The inconsistency of getting flagged is the same as the inconsistency of being upvoted. For example, I haven't had a chance to update my upvote bots for the last few weeks. Many good authors (you included) have benefited at the expense of other good new authors as a consequence, as I haven't had the chance to review and recycle my authors list.

The reality is that a lot more authors are benefitting from "irrational, hypocritical, idiotic and moronic" UPVOTING ( by me included!), then are being downvoted. If others who are watching the platform more attentively at this point decide they want to try and rectify this by downvoting, that is their prerogative.

If STEEM is successful and gains mass adoption, then voting will cease to be a game and become big business. At which point whale accounts will likely scrutinise every percentage point of every upvote - as the world will be watching and the rewards astronomical. Until then, enjoy the ride and rewards and keep stacking up that STEEM power!

P.S. At the rate @berniesanders is powering down, you could very well have more STEEM power than that account in a couple of weeks... making this whole call-out series largely redundant.