Well, today on steemit I already plagiarized me 3 times today with this quote.
A quote from one of my posts about spam, flag and mute.
"When calculating the actual value of a social network, we have to subtract the number of users that spam, flag and mute."
Attracting and retaining users that give real attention to steemit, augments the global value of the Steemit social network.

"The conflict of self-interest individuals, guilds or groups based on money and the equalitarian guilds based on people, actually is also the reflection of the conflicts emanating from the conflict between creators, investors, and initial visions for steemit."

The problem is this conflicts also steal value from the network.
The complexity of the introduction of monetary reward underlying people's actions in an attention economy is susceptible to generate fight for Power or ways to get rewards without real engagement or adding value to the social network.

If here is a honey pot and everybody likes it, will all the crowd fight for it emotionally and irrationally, or should we share it equally/proportionally based on the quantity of pollen each one brings to the hive?.
We must have better and more participation in the consensus of the ways to improve Steemit. Emotional behaviors block the emergence of consensus.
This is getting very long and I'm finishing with a Portuguese saying:
"House where there is no bread, everybody is angry but nobody is right"