You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Writing course / Curso de escritura #wewrite
The problem with AI as such is the use given to it, like any tool, it can corrupt good work if it is not used appropriately.
That can be right. I agree with you to some point.
I know you wouldn't use any AI-generated images to generate profits on Steem.
Tell me, is it REALLY that AI-generated images are forbidden on Steem (except for the use like you wrote in the last paragraph)? I can understand the principle if it is so: STEEM WANTS ORIGINALITY.
But I can tell you I have seen some articles that contain these kinds of images got big rewards and upvoted by the accounts which I think should go against them. When I find one, maybe I will show you, or maybe not.
You are also right, to a certain extent.
Images that are not your own, that is, that are taken from an image bank, are not an original production of the author of the post.. Everything that is there comes in here, including the images generated by AI.
I usually tell content creators that original content, which also includes photographs, is more representative of themselves. Content creators should know this and I think they know it.
So, the question is that not only are the images generated by AI not original, we must know and we are aware that neither are those taken from image banks...
If we delve deeper into the concept of originality, a photograph from an image bank could be an original production, but it does not belong to you. You borrow it and you must mention it.
The image that is created by AI, who belongs to it? to the AI... I guess. And it is not your creation either, and you should mention it.
That's how I understand it...
I Agree with you,,, in almost everything you type above.