Thanks for the feedback. But you have to employ fundamentals of understanding freedom and morality in order to understand the points objectively.

Using coercive governmental authoritarian control over our lives is not valid. Just because things are not "fair" is not a reason to engage in immoral conduct to try to correct it. I even mention that just because some big corps reap profits at the expense of employees, doesn't justify using immoral methodologies to force them to be more fair, and how it also hurts small businesses. People have the right to agree to work to be paid. They have freedom of choice. They agree to contracts. You seem to miss the whole point of the post. Especially how having a job is better than not having a job, no matter how little it provides you with an income, it's your choice to work or not and not survive.

Thing's aren't fair. We can correct things fairly if fair people create businesses and people go work for them, making their business a larger success, rather than working for the unfair employers. It's still freedom. I like cooperatives. It's up to us to fix our way of life by making alternatives that outcompete the unfair ways of life. But not use immoral justifications to make things "fair". The ends don't justify the means. The means are the end. Just because greedy selfish people use these points to continue to do what they do, doesn't negate or invalidate their validity and truth.