AutismOne Conference 2017 Speaker will present a study comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children

in #vaccines7 years ago


Finally there is research comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. On May 27, 2017 the AutisimOne 2017 Conference in Colorado Springs, Colorado will host Dr. Anthony Mawson.


Dr. Mawson will present new research entitled: Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children. His study was designed as a cross-sectional survey of homeschooling mothers on their vaccinated and unvaccinated biological children ages 6 to 12.

The study showed that vaccinated children are plagued with serious health concerns much more often than unvaccinated children.



Source


According to Celeste McGovern of the Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute. The trouble with doing a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study a century or so after it should have been done is that virtually all American children are vaccinated today. When 95 percent of children get injections, there are few ‘controls’ left for studying long-term outcomes. Comparing American children at large to small pockets of unvaccinated children like those in the Amish community is revealing, but critics say they are comparing apples to oranges. There are too many other variables — diet, fresh air, computer time, for example – that might explain differences in health besides vaccination status.

So, Anthony Mawson, a professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics in the School of Public Health, Jackson State University, along with colleagues Azad Bhuiyan and Binu Jacob, collaborated with Brian D. Ray, president of the National Home Education Research Institute in Salem, OR, to engage and enrol homeschooling families to participate in the study. In this way, homeschoolers were compared to homeschoolers (apples to apples), but with the added advantage that homeschoolers as a population match the profiles of American families at large. The families who responded to the anonymous online survey were recruited through homeschooling associations in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Oregon.



As with any research you always want to follow the money. This study was supported by grants from Generation Rescue, Inc., and the Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute, both charitable organizations that support research on children’s health and safety. It is important to note that the funders had no role or influence on the study design and conduct of the research or the preparation of reports.

Source of photo of sick child

Sort:  

This sort of controversy is an area in which the crowd sourced encyclopedia, Wikipedia, really shines. Rather than having experts with a particular agenda write the articles on these topics, the articles are revised by each side, with referees ensuring that the content is well referenced, until the articles are robust and balanced. Here is the link to the article I am discussing. Look up the references to the statements with which you disagree - I believe you will find that they are well documented truth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_controversies

I think that it is best that we agree to disagree.

I am confident that the 599,972 patients that reported vaccine reactions through VAERS , and those who have been vindicated through the U.S. Court of Claims and have been awarded nearly

$3.6 billion dollars

to vaccine victims for their catastrophic vaccine injuries, as well as the many neurologists, epidemiologists, and learned physicians will continue to speak out against the overreach and damage of the Pharmaceutical Industry. As I will.

The U.S. government handing out stolen money to people is not evidence that vaccines are harmful.

This is a very difficult topic for me as my life has been permanently altered because of a vaccine. I totally agree the money the government uses in any way is stolen from taxpayers.

The fact that the money is stolen isn't really my point though. My point is that because the money is stolen, the incentives are broken and how it's used can't be relied upon as credible vindication of anything.

I appreciate that it's a difficult topic, and I hope you can take this as constructive criticism. Lower quality arguments on either side distract from the best arguments and decrease the odds that the discussion will be productive. None of us have time to fully evaluate everything said by every person we encounter, so we evaluate credibility based on a small sample or first impression, and then prioritize who we listen to most based on that credibility.

Because this extremely small study (666 children total) relies upon self-report and the differences in groups it considers only includes health problems that are easily denied, the results are completely flawed. Many people who do not believe in vaccinations would never take their child to a pediatrician to by diagnosed with subjective health problems such as ADHD, autism, allergies, learning disabilities, etc. Therefore, the unvaccinated group was less likely to be diagnosed with these problems, even if they suffered from them at the same rate as the vaccinated group. When the two groups (vaccinated and not vaccinated) are compared in much larger studies, across the entire nation of the USA, eliminating parental determination of morbidity, the only differences between groups that are found are that unvaccinated children are far more likely to develop vaccine-preventable potentially fatal illnesses . Here are the real facts: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/diseases/child/pertussis.html

As a former Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner I used to feel as you do. Then I witnessed first hand several severe vaccine reactions and experienced a life altering reaction myself from a mandatory flu shot. I have now changed my mind. I hope you take the time to watch Silent Epidemic and listen to neurologists/ epidemiologists, and other medical professionals. Also did you know that more than 98 million Americans between 1955 and 1963 received the polio vaccine that was contaminated with cancer? No wonder cancer is such a problem today. But, don't worry the Pharmaceutical Industry is raking in the money from all those poor Americans whom they infected. Are you in this group of people? I am.

Here is a list of vaccines and their ingredients:

You must ask yourself, if vaccines are so safe why are vaccine manufactures immune from all liability and cannot be sued for adverse events?


With that information and the govenments plan for Healthy People 2020 and mandatory vaccines cradle to grave
271 new vaccines in the pipeline scares me. Please do your own research don't believe everything the CDC says after all they benefit financially as the CDC own patents on drugs too.

It is pretty rich for you to cite a single poorly designed study and then school me in doing my own research - might ought to take your own advice. I have thoroughly critically reviewed the extensive research on this topic. Meanwhile, the founder of your movement, Andrew Wakefield, who is still so revered, had trouble retaining nurses: they quit in droves and eventually testified in the hearing in which he lost his medical license that he tortured disabled children in his research lab.

Anecdotal evidence is by definition skewed, as you well know, and as a former NP you should also know that it is virtually impossible to know the specific cause of the problems you are assuming are vaccine related. This is worth watching to the end. The speaker, who grew up in a family that was vaccine-averse, is a young woman who became a pediatric nurse practitioner by earning her Master's Degree in Nursing (MSN, PNP) at age 18. Brilliant? You bet! And compassionate too.

I am sorry I had to laugh because of her reference to being called a kid nurse. I have practiced over 20+ years as an NP alone. She is as old as my children so in my opinion she has a lot of life experience ahead of her. Please watch Silent Epidemic.
https://steemit.com/vaccines/@canadian-coconut/measles-is-a-normal-childhood-illness-so-please-stop-calling-it-a-deadly-disease

So the fact that she is a brilliant researcher who was able to gain her MSN by age 18 is completely lost to you because you have so much more anecdotal evidence? WOW. No wonder you are an Anti-Vaxer. And, if the science is not as important to you as the hype, I am really glad you retired. I am a PhD Nurse Researcher with 35 years of bedside peds nursing experience, and I am willing to defer any day to someone with high quality evidence.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 64403.69
ETH 3463.55
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50