Do Vaccines May Harm Child Brain Development? Neurosurgeon-Dr Russell Blaylock reveals....
Childhood vaccines have always been a moderate concern based upon my own research.
But after watching Dr Russell Blaylock's lecture on vaccines and child brain development, I became even more concerned about this troubling situation!
NEUROSURGEON-DR RUSSELL BLACKLOCK-pictured above
I would encourage you watch this video by Dr Russell Blaylock and you'll find that it's not just mercury that is poses risks...But a whole lot more, as well! I believe that knowledge is power and that we shouldn't just sit quietly and get spoon fed "truth" by mainstream media and science community. Instead, we should do our own due diligence and gather information from a variety of trusted sources so that we may reach our own informed opinion and approach it accordingly.
courtesy of the vaccination information network
via youtube
Thanks for the post. The truth will out.
You're welcome!
Yes, the truth will out.
Mass Vaccination will come to seen of one of our civilisation's greatest follies.
So very true, @alanfreestone
Upvoted and followed.
Vaccines are just a way to Inject harmful substances In to the human body. These substances attack the central nervous system and cause the central nervous system to attack Itself. Nagalase molecules are being found In vaccines and this will cause cancer In people. People need to spread the word about vaccines because a lot of people naively trust they are safe. I for one know they are not safe. They will also be used to Inject Smart Dust In to people, DARPA have already developed this. This will allow the Illuminati Cabal to control people with technology. This Is Fact and Truth.
Keep posting until someone listens. People are slowly waking up, sick of the lies they're being fed.
@katdvine
Thanks for the encouragement!
Thank you for a very informative post. The video in your post is excellent. We must continue to spread this important message. This is another extremely important video:
Bill Gates on vaccines and depopulation of the planet
Upvoted and resteemed
@marymg2014
You're welcome and thank you for your comments, upvote and resteem!
There is no a science community that debates and decide a common position about vaccines, transgenics, global warming, etc.
It is true that most medical research is funded by big pharmaceutical companies and that some of his studies may be slightly manipulated. But others independent organisms also review those studies and also make their own. And other competing companies make studies to test the medicines.
Of course that vaccines can have side effects, but decades of investigation show that this sides effects are minimal. And the investigation continues to try to reduce those effects. For example, looking for preservants less toxic than mercury.
No long term studies have been done on the effects of vaccines, and no vaccine maker has ever published studies on their vaccines.
How about this? I think a mean of 43 years since the vaccine was received is long enough.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X04004955
For those who are interested in the bad practices being made by pharmaceutical industry I recommend to reading the book "Bad pharma" by Ben Goldacre. It is ver interesting and show evidences about the problems he claim.
It's not, and nowhere near large enough, and the little that is available says absolutely nothing about their method, the control or their tests, so to critique something that requires $40 to view how they came to that conclusion is nonsense. The other part is that research on their efficacy or effects doesn't exist from the makers, and to cite some study founded by the government and ran by the government without any peer review is not science but propaganda. The worst offender in this case isn't the fraudulent CDC and their bogus VACCINES DONE CAUSE AUTISM, WAKEFIELD WAS WRONG, it's the DOD, the last place you'd find credibility. What does exist is numerous studies that have concluded the vastly opposite of that dubious one, with unvaccinated being in way better health than their vaccinated counterparts, studies after studies, and if you care I'll dig them up, none locked behind absurd fees or special privileges, as this information should be free.
I don´t like the fact that most scientific articles are not open acess, but doing science is expensive. I wish public budget in research and development was much higher.
I would like to see those studies you talk about, independently founded and peer-reviewed.
Proving that a conspiracy exists is impossible, you can always argue that it is so well hidden that nobody found strong evidence yet.
@baah
Exactly! They used to think smoking was safe years ago...
I disagree (strongly). I work at the front line treating vaccine damage. It's widespread & not being recorded by physicians. There's been no studies of the effects of multiple vaccs , there's no studies on vaxxed Vs un-vaxxed. You won't get compensation from Vacc damage courts if you mention 'autism' (you have to use euphemisms instead).
It's a scam.
Please explain yourself. Where are you treating vaccine damage? How do you verify that symptoms are caused by vaccines and not by any other illness? How do you treat that vaccine symptoms?
I have already posted one study about long term effects of multiple vaccines. You may think that one is not enough, but I don´t have time enough to filter and compare all this type of studies.
You can read some of my old posts to get an idea of exactly what I do :)
I verify by observation. For example, this evening a client visited me. I'm treating her autistic son. First prescription: Vaccine detox. Result: No reaction or improvement. 2nd prescription: a detox of the drugs the mum took in labour (pitocin, epidural etc) result so far: We have speech! He's saying 'bye bye', he's repeating whatever parents say now + lots of other improvements. These started 1 week after starting labour drug detox. So I observe that this shows the labour drugs caused many of this boy's autism symptoms. Now you could argue other factors may have caused these dramatic improvements in his symptoms (yup, I agree), but if no other variable has obviously changed, then we add 'factor x' & 2 days later induce a fever & 3 days after that he starts talking, I'D argue we (probably) have observed cause & effect in action :)
Please link to the study you mention, I may have missed it.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X04004955
It's not much of a study, but thank you for the link.
Yes, maybe it´s not much of a study, but I trust it more that your observations. Giving the same sugar pills with different name to your patients only shows how strong the placebo effect is.
If you can show that you can identify different homeopathics compounds with the same size and without looking at the label, you can win the 1M$ dollar paranormal challenge offered by James Randi Foundation and finally prove that homeopathy is not just a placebo effect.
If not, please stop blaming proved treatments.
O.k... I had already predicted your reaction from your previous responses, but I still thought I'd spend the time explaining my observations. It's unfortunate that so many people supposedly interested in 'science' have such closed minds.
Oh the ol' paedophile James Randi nonsense (or non-science). Prof Vithoulkas from Greece took paed-Randi up on his challenge. There was a team in Athens to record Vithoulkas' work. However when it became clear that he clearly would win the $1M challenge Randi pulled out, the foundation claiming it wasn't a REAL $1M, Randi was too old & infirm etc etc.
Homeopathy is effective medicine, allopathy (apart from emergency medicine) is dangerous & often ineffective. The truth will out.
I'm grateful for Steemit so that I can continue talking about my experiences & results without fear of censorship.
@ropaga
I thank you for your feedback and welcome a diversity of opinions on this issue!