Why I'm very happy to not have Vaxxed my baby girl with the Hepatitis B vaccine
In a previous post (https://steemit.com/food/@freedomvigilante/don-t-legally-posion-your-kids-please-you-probably-don-t-know-that-you-are-doing-it) I was explaining how I managed not to get hepatitis B vaccinated my new born baby girl with just a few hours outside her mother.
That post got censored on SteemIt (https://steemit.com/steemit/@freedomvigilante/has-steemit-a-bigger-censorship-than-facebook) because some whale downvoted not because of the quality of the article but because of ideological reasons. I hope that this one doesn't get censored also!
Although censored, I got some comments - probably thanks to the support from @canadian-coconut - some of them nasty that reflects the type of people making them, and others more reasonable but supporting vaccination programs and in particular Hepatitis B vaccination which is the one that I managed to not put to my baby girl. So I started answering to this person with facts and scientific arguments about the real danger of the hepatitis B vaccine, which in the end became this post! ;)
So you think it's a good idea to give to a new born, whose immune system is still not developed, a vaccine?
Here is what the hepatitis B Vaccine contains:
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION OF THE HBVAXPRO 5 HEPATITIS B VACCINE
One dose (0.5 ml) contains:
- Hepatitis B virus surface antigen, recombinant (HBsAg) * 5 micrograms Adsorbed on amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate (0.25 milligram Al+)
- produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain 2150-2-3) yeast by recombinant DNA technology
- This vaccine may contain traces of formaldehyde and potassium thiocyanate, which are used during the manufacturing process. See sections 4.3, 4.4 and 4.
- borax (you have to go to page 7 of the document to find it)
https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2011/2011031798791/anx_98791_en.pdf
So the Hepatitis B vaccine given to a new born with only a few minutes outside her mother contains:
aluminum:
- a potent neurotoxic: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19568732 (if you follow the link and get an error just reload the page to see the publication, it is some kind of problem in the NCBI website).
- causing Alzheimer later in life: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157018
- Brain and bone disease: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/PHS/PHS.asp?id=1076&tid=34
- Damage to the central nervous system, Dementia, Loss of memory, Listlessness, Severe trembling: http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/al.htm
Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. A yeast injected directly on the blood stream of a new born that can cause a fungus infection as the immune system is still not fully developed. S. cerevisiae has been related to a wide variety of infections, which range from vaginitis in healthy patients and cutaneous infections, to systemic bloodstream infections and infections of essential organs in immunocompromised and critically ill patients https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4705302/ I consider a new born a type of "immunocompromised" specially when you have already injected all the rest of poisons in the vaccine.
Recombinant DNA: the yeast has been made with recombinant DNA (genetically modified) which means creating genetic material from mixing multiple sources using a "cloning vector" which is a virus. One of the main features of a virus is its capacity to mutate becoming something else. This means that in the future that vector virus could become aggressive and cause cancer or other problems. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombinant_DNA)
formaldehyde: cause cancer, specially leukemia and brain cancer. How many children are right now in hospitals with leukemia and brain cancer? Many! right? You know now one of the main causes of it, the formaldehyde they received in their vaccines! A boy from the same school than my daughter died of brain cancer at just 3 years old. What can have caused him a brain cancer so young other than the vaccines? Because he haven't had time to be exposed to other sources of formaldehyde. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/formaldehyde/formaldehyde-fact-sheet
potassium thiocyanate: this substance has effects on the thyroid and central nervous system , resulting in impaired functions and hypothyroidism. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1088.html
borax: you might know this component that is widely used in detergents and pesticides! And it is injected in new borns!? Furthermore there is strong evidence that borax cause fertility problems. It was added to the Substance of Very High Concern (SVHC) candidate list on 16 December 2010 which is part of the EU Regulations on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals 2006 (REACH). The addition was based on the revised classification of borax as toxic for reproduction category 1B under the CLP Regulations. Products containing borax now are required to be labelled with the warnings "May damage fertility" and "May damage the unborn child"! The documentation about the Hepatitis B vaccine does not carry this warning, which to me means that they are violating EU law. What the docuementation says is about infertility is "HBVAXPRO has not been evaluated in fertility studies". So they put a product recognized to cause infertility product in a vaccine for new borns and they don't study what the fertility effects are and they don't give any warnings about it? To me that could be even a criminal offence! The vaccine should not have been put in the market without evaluating first the fertility impact. Furthermore, there are concerns about borax being a liver carcinogen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borax#Toxicity. So in theory they want to prevent liver cancer caused by Hepatitis B and they put a liver carcinogen on the vaccine! Where is the logic on that?
So what do you prefer?
To poison your baby with that poisonous mix in the vaccine (with the compounded effect of adding all of them at the same time) provoking brain damage, central nervous system damage, bone disease, dementia, loss of memory, systemic bloodstream infections and infections of essential organ, leukemia and brain cancer, impaired functions and hypothyroidism, infertility, liver cancer,.... Or to take the extremely remote risk of getting the baby infected with the hepatitis B virus?
We cannot remove the risk from life
We don't know if one day crossing a traffic light a driver is going to hit our baby and kill him, actually that happened to another family on the same school also, although years before my daughter started there (the parents still put flowers regularly on the spot). So we cannot remove 100% the risk of getting hepatitis B all we can do is to try to reduce the risk by taking simple hygienic and behavioural measures.
The hepatitis B vaccine does not protect as expected!!!
The hepatitis B vaccine does not give 100% protection against infection, you would think, nothing is 100% but you will expect at least 90 or even 80% protection. You will be surprised by the FACT that seroprotection is obtained only by 57.2% of the children that receives the vaccine! So if you have 2 children there is a high chance that one of them is not protected by the hepatitis B vaccine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598613/ The risk of this also is that, thinking that he or she is protected by the vaccine, can get into risky behaviours (not caring much about sharing bodily fluids) that can make him/her infected with hepatitis B.
What's 100% sure
100% sure is that those children vaccinated have been poisoned and are at risk, or are suffering, from the health issues described above and many others that we still don't fully understand like allergies, asthma, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, autism, infertility, etc. (although I sincerely hope that they were lucky and that they will be healthy all their lives).
Everything here is only about one vaccine, imagine what happens when you start adding all the other vaccines, and giving single shots with multiple vaccines mixed, for which a clinical study has never been conducted to understand the interaction of multiple vaccines when injected simultaneously.
It is 100% sure also that my baby girl got poisoned because I did not manage to convince my wife not to vaccinate our baby with the other vaccines. At least I managed to convince her to give our baby single vaccines and not mixed vaccines which have never passed a clinical study to prove that their are safe (and effective) when mixed.
I feel very sorry for this and ashamed because my baby girl was extremely intelligent before the vaccines but after she got them became just a normal girl, average intelligence, like any other girl (also vaccinated) when previously she was clearly more intelligent than the others.
Vaccines are making us less intelligent and thus easier to control and manipulate. Here is the FACT about how humanity is getting less intelligent: http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/BRBAKER/
FACTS
Someone on my previous post was talking about FACTS trying to defend vaccines, but he didn't have FACTS, only the lies from the pharmaceutical industry that he believed right away without any due diligence executed on his part. Here are the FACTS backed by SCIENTIFIC PAPERS and not by publicity from the pharmaceutical "industry".
Prove of how they lie to us
Just to prove the point, on the previous scientific papers says that protection was only 57.2% but on the document titled "Hepatitis B FAQs for the Public" they say : "Can Hepatitis B be prevented? Yes. The best way to prevent Hepatitis B is by getting the Hepatitis B vaccine. The Hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective and is usually given as 3-4 shots over a 6-month period." https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hbv/bfaq.htm#bFAQ31
That is an outright lie as I have proved with the scientific papers, but for the "public" (like if we were idiots that don't understand anything) they lie saying that it can be prevented (but only 57.2%), safe (not) and effective (not).
If you are an intelligent person and your brain is not totally brainwashed you will understand this and you will become part of our movement against the dangerous and ineffective vacines .
Enjoy life!
NOTES :
Let's have a constructive discussion below with arguments backed by scientific papers and not just pharmaceutical marketing
This article took me some time to compose, please support my work by upvoting and following me if you are interested on the theme, I also post about cryptocurrencies ;)
If you don't agree with my ideas please comment it and we can talk, please don't downvote me because I have different ideas than you, that is censoring. Down voting is for when you think that the article does not have quality (I hope it does have even if you do not agree with it)
When I first began to learn of the dangers of vaccines, it was actually the measles/mumps/rubella or MMR that initiated my research. I spoke to a medical doctor who did not deny the possible link between this vaccine and injuries, and in fact spoke about an egg protein that was in the shots, where if an individual were allergic to eggs there could be dangerous results. I looked this up just now and there is documentation on the subject at the time of its discovery from the NACI and The Canadian Journal of Infectious diseases:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327424/
Vaccines continue to have this protein in them to this day, which you can find on the website for the CDC (center for disease control and prevention):
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm
The largest problem with this particular allergy is that the first round of MMR shots are given to a baby of six months. Which means there is no way to know whether they have an allergy to eggs since it's before a child would have ever consumed eggs. Not to mention there is a big difference between eating a bit of egg which then has to go through the digestive process, and having it injected directly into the bloodstream
In my case I manged to delay the MMR shot until she was 4 years old, but still happened the brain damage that is showing through a reduced intelligence after the shot. She does not have autism nor anything similar but she is now an average intelligence vaccinated girl and not more intelligent than the other already vaccinated kids as she was.
Thank you for your support!
This is a great post People blindly believe doctors and the medical system without questioning it and looking at the arguments that are against what the medical systems have to offer.
I am yet to be a parent any time soon but if I do and choose not to vaccinate my children I can imagine my parents will be so pissed off and think what is wrong with me. They are brainwashed. Every time I talk about these topics they don't want to listen.
But I am glad that some people get it.
I am with you on this. I am not 100% against vaccine but I do feel any child under the age of 3 shouldn't receive any form a foreign proteins in the blood stream. Its only gonna train an unestablished immune system to have a inflammatory response. Most childhood disease that are on the rise are inflammatory diseases.
This video is a bit long but it has great info.
Excellent video! I watch it at x1.5 speed so it takes shorter ;)
People in favour of vaccines should watch this video if they are scientific and not just following faithfully the vaccine "religion".
Thank you for your support!
I agree. Thanks for posting. We need to get the word out.
Thanks for continuing to share your truths on Steemit!
I think the concept of immune system not developed and vaccination is quite a misconception. Yet at birth right at time zero, the immune is low but the baby has all the immunological factors-mainly immunogolbulim G from its mother since It is the only form.which can cross the placenta. But right from t plus zero hour , there starts the great surge of immune buildup in the child. Their immune cells have high mitotic activity , regeneration and great memory. That is the basis of BCG polio and DPT vaccine. You outweigh the benefits at arount 50 percent. But that is why there are booster doses to be tsken yearly.
Without the vaccine, protection rate that falls closer to 3 percent. Better be safe at 57 percent initially and above 85 with boosters than sorry later.
Better to take the very low risk of getting Hepatitis B rather than get you poisoned 100% sure, that is my opinion and that of many.
What do you think that aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate, Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast by recombinant DNA, formaldehyde and potassium thiocyanate does in the body of a new born, and the long term impact on all his/her live?
To me and many the risk/benefit ratio is completely against vaccines. In my case I saw how the intelligence of my daughter was lowered just after vaccination. Specifically just after the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine.
Also please provide the scientific papers proving your statements, but until not scientifically proved I don't trust that "boosters" increase seroprotection to 85%. In fact I have read studies finding that boosters do not increase significantly seroprotection.
What booster do is to continue poisoning our kids.
Dear @freedomvigilante, it is not called poisoning. Please kindly quote your sources. For something there is no cure or treatment , prevention is all we have got. And please tell me how is it called poisoning when you are geing given anti hep b immunoglobulins? Please post me your query in scientific terms based on researches. I will reply to all of your above questions. I will be happy to answer all of it.
Another thing. Recombinant dna is the new best that makes sure you dont get the wrong bits in your system. It only codes the protective protein parts which are called extrons and excludes all other parts. Long term studies have shown no hsrmful effects or expression of the source genes in humans.
Here is a source .https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hbv/bfaq.htm it actually says over 90 percent. If you do not beleive the cdc , i can still provide you with more proof or a part of my research work with full of quotations. I understand your ideology , but i feel it kind of sends a wrong message to the community. Nothing in this world today beleive expert opinions. Everything is evidence based or scientifically proven. In your terms, it indirectly sends a challenge to all the vaccines of your children. I think there are better things to be worried like child food, toy paints, dish lead , soap and shampoo mixtures and preservatives in babys food than a debate for vaccination.
@anadikc that is not a scientific paper it is the same link that I posted in my writting. Have you really read in dept my posting or you just dismissed it like (bahhh another crazy anti vaccines guy?)
Precisely in my posting I make the point that this FAQ is "for the Public" (like if we were idiots) and is full of lies. If you go to the real scientific paper on the US National Library of Medicine you will see that the seroprotection was only 57.2%. That is the realty and the FAQ are lies. I have supported all my statements in my post with scientific research already, I cannot post you more.
I definitely send a challenge to all the vaccines of your and my children, they were wrong, they have made our children ill for the rest of their lives and have created many cases of autism. Watch the video that @shadowblade has posted above with an open mind (instead of with a religious faith on vaccines) if you have the guts. There it give you the data based on scientific papers of the damages that vaccines are doing to our kinds and our society.
I insist, my daughter is not hepatitis B vaccinated thankfully and she will never be. She will just take care of who to kiss and have sex with.
Also apparently with the current antiviral treatments, when the illness is chronic (which usually is not when adquired in adulthood) with the current antivirals the illness can be controlled very well and live almost a normal life with little liver damage. Also apparently they are very close to finally obtain a cure, if you are interested read this article: http://www.mdedge.com/familypracticenews/article/134726/hepatology/six-milestones-only-two-left-route-hep-b-cure
About the other risks, they are different that vaccines because I can control them, but with vaccines practically being forced upon us, it is very difficult to avoid the damage that they provoke. Out of the things you mention: child food, what's that? we never gave "child food" to our daughter, she always has eaten the same than us, everything bio and many of the things from our own organic garden, she doesn't drink milk, all her toys are made of wood an painted with natural paints, all the dishware is lead free and during her first years she had all food on organic wooden dishes, we only use organic soap and shampoo without perfumes and of course without parabens, etc. We do not use perfumes, toothpaste, creams, etc... only natural products like almond, coconut and olive oils, aromatic plants from our garden, etc. We do not eat any pre-packaged food or anything that comes in a plastic bag, we have wifi turned off at home and we only use our mobile phones when necessary and handsfree, obviously our daughter will not have a mobile phone until she is at least 14 years old and with restrictions. We also live happily in the country side without pollution. It is very easy life, we just don't go to "normal" supermarkets because they only sell products full of poisons, instead we buy online from specialized online shops selling only organic products, we don't buy practically any industrial product and we produce ourself all we can. It's easy, cheaper and creates happiness on us.
In any case, if we were using those products, I see the risk of using those much lower than the vaccines, so the vaccination debate is really important because of the health of our kids, the future generations and from a personal liberty stand point against the totalitarian state-industry.
I never said it was a scientific paper. Again to re-elaborate , the paper link you is also not a scientific paper and it talks about secondary prevention - that is treatment of patients who already have the condition . There is no role of vaccination in that and that is not what we are discussing. We are disccusing primordal or primary prevention - and vaccination is the only way. I am saying i will share your links to it. CDC is the governing authority about any disease. They have citations in the links.PLease check them. Its not an issue of dismissal. I think you might have heard of SA-14-14-2 vaccine. Its for JE. I am against that vaccine because it has terrible sideaffects during long term observations. I was involved in the vaccine introduction study of the SA 14-14.
Also you mentioned about your childs intelligence decreasing. Could you please mention about the methodology that was used to assess it? If that that is true, it needs to be looked upon . Also , i would like to add All scientific papers are not valid or do not have good strength. It needs to be published in a highly indexed or a journal of high impact factor. And regarding autism and other illness - we have just started to understand it as the field to psychiatry and childhood behavioral disorders are rapidly expanding.
Vaccines - you also have control over it. There are opt in and opt outs. In opt outs, you chose out of a mandatory vaccine - but if in case of a breakout of a disease or re-emergence, you might be held responsible if you are the point source. Its good to hear that your are a bio family - i appreciate your healthy life style. But again, its a community thing. Not everyone has a similar lifestlye.
also to further add. please check the links below and be 100 percent sure of what message you are trying to sen to the community. They are from indexed journals with high impact factors.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19047220
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17414397
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11734710
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/separating-fact-from-fiction-in-the-newborn-nursery-hepatitis-b-vaccine-for-newborns/
This one is talking about believes and not science. He is just "vomiting" the pharma industry lies not backed by science.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/separating-fact-from-fiction-in-the-newborn-nursery-hepatitis-b-vaccine-for-newborns/
Now, on this study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19047220
They had two groups:
Group 1: The control group that were infants vaccinated with "diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccine and separate doses of hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccines"
Group 2: The test group, infants vaccinated with a single shot of "diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine"
What they found is that both groups had the same level of "safety events" which is a nice way of saying strong reactions to the vaccine. In control group 15 infants had seizures and in the test group 16 had seizures. So their conclusion, that I don't agree with and I'll explain why later, is that it is as bad injecting all the vaccines at the same time (5 vaccines) than injecting them in three shots (3+1+1).
And those are only the ones that had a really strong reaction because no study was done about the neurological damage made to the ones that didn't get the seizure.
Why are they getting seizures? because the vaccine is damaging the central nervous system, most of the infants suffer the damage but manage not to get a seizure when some of them get the seizure. But the important point is not if there is a seizure or not, the important point is that the vaccine is damaging so much the brain of all the infants that some even get seizures!.
Don't you see it? Vaccines is poisoning our children!
If it was not poisoning then seizures would not happen an if there are seizures is because the nervous system is attacked in all infants, no only on the ones that had seizures.
And the study failed to report on all the other short, medium and long term side effects of the vaccine. Also, at lest in the abstract, the study does not indicate what was the time span between getting shot 1, shot 2 and shot 3 in the control group and this makes a huge difference. Was the control group given the different shots on the same day, the same week, a month later, a year later? That information is crucial as well as measuring the levels of mercury, thimerosal, aluminium and whatever other poisons the vaccines had on them. Without all that information the study is practically useless and only serves the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, which most probably financed the study. I know how it works, I have insider knowledge about the clinical trials and the pharmaceutical industry.
** Vaccines are not safe, vaccines and poisoning and killing people! The remedy is worst than the problem. **
There will always be some reactions / million of doses (maybe 10-20).Can you confirm that it was vaccine related – of a faulty molecule??? There are several things to take into consideration. Maybe the dosage by the caretaker was in appropriate, maybe the cold chain was not maintained, maybe the technique was faulty. Blaming the vaccine straightway is not the right thing to do. That is inevitable. If hundered per million doses get the reaction, its worrisome.Just because a plane can crash probability <0.0001 percent doesnt mean you stop flying. Vaccination is safer than flying. The rest if upto you. And regarding all the elements you are mentioning, it is all required for genetic engineering or else we will still be in stone age. Different places have different trial or dose protocols depending upon the prevalence of the disease. For eg: ebola they had to give without stage 3 trials as they did not have time. yes the vaccines may have caused problems in some but saved many lives . By the looks of it, you should not only be taking vaccination but no factory produced items, drugs or anything in that regards. Companies say eg: Agent 106738 which is their patent molecule? Do we all even know what that molecule could be?
Basically what you are saying is "it wasn't me (vaccines), it was you (other factors)... I don't think that sounds very good, isn't it?
About factory produced items, there is a big difference, you are free to buy products from factories or not, but vaccines are imposed on you and your siblings, there is no freedom of choice and that is Fascism or Communism, which are basically the same thing with different names.
In fact, I have chosen not to eat anything coming from a factory with industrial processes, I only buy and eat bio food and products, I grow some of my own bio food, I try to limit as much as I can my expose to poisons, carcinogens and radiation.
Changing a few rules and habits is very easy and we live a very happy life in the country side.
Look, this can go on and on forever. Please read about when does an incidence of a vaccine related side affects pose a health threat, what are the causes of vaccine related side affects and also about what would be situation be if there were no vaccines? But please do not highlight untrue things like "Vaccines are not safe, poisoning and killing people". I can challenge you from every aspect to prove you wrong but I am not here to do so. You are sharing what you think - but dont make a headline out of your conclusion. I respect your opinion but opinions merely reflect reality.
You asked for it so I provide it to you, but you could have found it yourself also...
This paper proves that vaccines provoke Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), tic disorder (TD), and hyperkinetic syndrome of childhood (also known as attention deficit disorder [ADD]/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD])
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433557/
So that is "when does an incidence of a vaccine related side affects pose a health threat, what are the causes of vaccine related side affects".
The situation in which we would be without vaccines is that we will be smarter, healthier and with a stronger immune system. Also we will have LESS infant DEATHS if they were NOT VACCINATED as this study proves:
"Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths. Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants might receive"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547435/
So that proves that more vaccines more deaths, less vaccines less deaths.
I know that it is difficult for you to change your life long believes, but please read the papers and question your previous believes. It is not your fault, you were lied and tricked by the pharmaceutical industry to believe than, and if you dare to even scientifically question it you could be expelled from medical practice... They are a Mob
I'm 100% on your side with this subject as well. I will definitely not be vaccinating my children when I get to that point in life. It's sad how looked down upon you become for truly doing your research and doing what's best for your kids.