RE: The Epidemic Rise in FOOD ALLERGIES -- And How They Knew 100 Years ago that Vaccination Could Cause This
People in developed countries were not dying of measles before mass measles vaccination started here. I'm 48 in Canada and the vaccine wasn't given in Canada yet when I was a kid. I had measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox. People were not dying of it then. People weren't worried about it when I was a kid. My mom never took me or my 3 sibling to the doctor when we got measles. Yes, measles was common, but the death rate had dropped off to almost zero before the vaccine was introduced. Even today with the Measles "scare" in Disneyland, nobody died. So the fear is really hyped up just to sell a vaccine.
Think about the chickenpox vaccine -- in the USA and Canada where it is on the childhood schedule, the health info tells us that it is a dangerous disease. In countries like England and almost all the world where they don't give that vaccine, the health departments say that it is mild and normal and nothing to worry about.
Fears sells vaccines.
At any rate ... parents should be informed of the risk they trade off for to avoid measles, etc. I'm glad that I had measles for 1 week of my life, rather than having to watch what I eat EVERY DAY of my life -- even if the allergy doesn't kill but only brings discomfort or pain.
Thank-you for your comment and participating in discussion!
Maybe the CDC website isn't the best resource, but it at least partially disagrees with you:
Anyway, thanks for your reply. I think you can guess which side of the vaccination debate I'm on, but I'm interested in learning what more there is to learn.
I think you and cc are on the same side!
People might think the "sides" are anti or pro vaccine but I disagree: you have to want to impose your will on other people for us to need sides like anti or pro vaccine. Most people don't want that or can easily give that up, it is illegal and one has to use force or aggression to enforce it.
I think the much more effective way to pick "sides" is this: If you want to profit on vaccines at the expense of health then you might be on a side.
In other words, I really like your professional replies. I'm really happy to hear your perspective on the post. I think you and cc and myself are all on the same side. Yes the fraud in the CDC is a very big concern.
I'm going to give you some stats to put those deaths into perspective, and then link to the source ...
http://vaxtruth.org/2012/01/measles-perspective/
I will have to do a post about just measles soon. Hopefully we can discuss this more when I do that post.
Do you have a report about the 10 or so CDC scientists that signed a statement about the misrepresentation of data based on corporate interests? (for @biophil)
Thanks for mentioning that jamesc ... Here's a link to my article on the dozen brand new whistleblowers at the CDC ...
https://steemit.com/vaccines/@canadian-coconut/a-dozen-brand-new-whistleblowers-within-the-cdc-s-p-i-d-e-r-bites-the-centers-for-disease-control
You are open to learn, that's all that matters. And you are polite, so thank-you.
I already posted how the number of measles deaths is a very, very small percentage when you look at the whole population.
If you want to take the time to go back and look at some of my older posts, you will see how I discuss the numbers of injuries and deaths from the vaccines themselves.
It's all about risk vs. benefit. From my studies, the risks of vaccines far outweigh the benefits. At one time, I went through each illness/disease and each vaccine, because it is possible that one or two vaccines could have a higher benefit than risk analysis. My conclusion was that none of vaccines had a higher benefit than the risk ratio. But each person must do their own research. I can't tell anyone what to do. Everything in life comes with some risk.