You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: CDC is a Vaccine Company, Not an Independent Agency -- revealed by activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Resteemed! Something equally very unnerving is that no viruses that we have vaccines against have ever been isolated.
Thank-you for resteeming!
You should write a post about the viruses not being isolated. I'm not familiar with that topic.
Here is a start if anybody wants to read more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Perth_Group (fur the lulz)
http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/polio-vaccines-cancer-debunking-myth/(fur the lulz, for the comments, fur lulz)
http://neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm
http://www.immunity.org.uk/videos/positively-false-the-programme-that-never-got-shown/
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/11/03/bombshell-scientist-finds-no-reliable-evidence-ebola-virus-ever-isolated-from-a-human-being/
There's numerous articles from NCBI
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12690092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772359/
http://www.virology.ws/2013/04/16/avian-influenza-h7n9-viruses-isolated-from-humans-what-do-the-gene-sequences-mean/
They follow the same path: Isolated by cell culture or an animal and examine under electron microscope the cell's and 'open view', then by observation make your assumptions, if viral structure is identified follow up with biochemical markers for antibodies and other toxins which are linked with a disease which corresponds to the symptoms of the patient. Antibodies have been thought to work with a lock and key method but it seems that it's not like that. Reading anything on biology, and especially clinical medicine, comes down to 90% baseless assertions/outside observation, and 10% observation. In spite of their idea of how antibodies work, they used these to qualify something as "it's a VIRUS", because it's got these "SPECIFIC" antibodies, or ..chemicals. As usual they cannot explain at all, how/why that one chemical or antibody/biochemical marker is higher in 20% of people with said virus, but this is studied intensely until the conclusion of "WE DON'T HAVE ANY FUCKING IDEA WHAT SO EVER" a very wise one comes up, or someone comes up and says, you guys are morons of epic levels:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160575/
They relied on labeling something as "tagged" and silenced all questions by assuming each tag was individual born out of random and worked on specifics.. and so in spite of mounting evidence this was consensus and has been at identifying viruses with our naked eyes.
It looks like a virus+test for markers that fight virus=virus confirmed, because we know what the function of antibodies are in this context, clearly, in lieu that it could be some other random ass virus.
(wiki)
I remember reading something about Dr. Mary's Monkey on whale which said that poliovirus was never isolated in humans, even though there's literature from that time period claiming they have, but that means nothing more than baseless assertions without methodology and actual evidence. http://www.virology.ws/2008/12/19/100th-anniversary-of-the-isolation-of-poliovirus/
Completly utterly full of SHIT.
http://whale.to/vaccine/articles.html