Downvoting moderators will not solve anything. You got the vote and @jedigeiss also replied to you. Until it is said otherwise, the moderators can decide if any post can be upvoted or not.
I did not believe that post deserved a upvote. No appoligy or explenation. Just a "jedi said it is ok". In my opinion that should not recieve a upvote.
The reasoning a moderator can choose whatever he wants is not correct at all. It gets decided diffrently for everyone then. One mod does this the other does that. Not efficient or fair!
The moderators are here also to "decide" the quality of the work. The moderator told you the reasons why he saw your work as not good enough. The antenna part may be really subjective yet it was not the only reason why your contribution got rejected. The Utopian post is not a requirement to participate in the contest.
You ask the same question again but it was already answered. It is also written in the contest post that not everyone may be upvoted.
Everyone that takes part can get an Upvote from Utopian by using the graphic sector of Utopian.io
It does not say that you will be upvoted or that you have to be upvoted.
However, it appears that you like to threaten the moderators. It is really unfortunate to hear that you do not like Utopian but you forget that the upvote is not for everyone. But if you cannot control your temper, it might be better to take a pause from Utopian for a while instead of downvoting others and threatening them.
Why do i even bother responding to this. I am stil waiting for a decent enough explenation. Yet i recieve the same one over and over. Think what you think.
More and more people get irritated with the high and mighty flings of the moderators. There is no consistency at all. One mod might approve, the other not. Because there personal opinions count.
That is wrong.
P.S.: i did not threaten anyone. I said i would take action when there was no reasonable explenation given. I downvoted because of that. I did not recieve that explenation. Point made and closed.
Downvoting moderators will not solve anything. You got the vote and @jedigeiss also replied to you. Until it is said otherwise, the moderators can decide if any post can be upvoted or not.
I did not believe that post deserved a upvote. No appoligy or explenation. Just a "jedi said it is ok". In my opinion that should not recieve a upvote.
The reasoning a moderator can choose whatever he wants is not correct at all. It gets decided diffrently for everyone then. One mod does this the other does that. Not efficient or fair!
The moderators are here also to "decide" the quality of the work. The moderator told you the reasons why he saw your work as not good enough. The antenna part may be really subjective yet it was not the only reason why your contribution got rejected. The Utopian post is not a requirement to participate in the contest.
You ask the same question again but it was already answered. It is also written in the contest post that not everyone may be upvoted.
It does not say that you will be upvoted or that you have to be upvoted.
However, it appears that you like to threaten the moderators. It is really unfortunate to hear that you do not like Utopian but you forget that the upvote is not for everyone. But if you cannot control your temper, it might be better to take a pause from Utopian for a while instead of downvoting others and threatening them.
Why do i even bother responding to this. I am stil waiting for a decent enough explenation. Yet i recieve the same one over and over. Think what you think.
More and more people get irritated with the high and mighty flings of the moderators. There is no consistency at all. One mod might approve, the other not. Because there personal opinions count.
That is wrong.
P.S.: i did not threaten anyone. I said i would take action when there was no reasonable explenation given. I downvoted because of that. I did not recieve that explenation. Point made and closed.