RE: Incentivizing contributors to Open source projects. Was it the best idea that was birthed?? (part 2)
Hello @harry-heightz, Thank you for writing this review about Utopian.
I think you did not convey your information properly. Your previous post was on point, and I like everything you shared there which includes your personal views about the project.
Utopian has been practicing transparency right from the genesis of the project. I joined Utopian at the early stage, and most of the processes back then were transparent. Yes! The review process was different, it was ''Approved'' and ''Declined'', but the ''rebellion'' was not the reason for the new scoring system. The Utopian team focused on improving everything about the project. So, the new transparent scoring system is as a result of Internal zeal for improvement and to make sure that high-quality contributions are prioritized over average quality contribution, and average quality contributions are prioritized over low-quality contribution respectively.
The only changes in the Suggestions category were just text. The guidelines reproduce the same thing as before. @knowledges and others in the Suggestions team were able to control abused and Irrelevant Suggestions.
I appreciate the effort you put in writing this post; however, I'll suggest that you do more findings of the project before posting in the future. Thank you.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Thanks for your review @tykee. I just shared my own experience on the platform from my own observations. I don't know and I can't be aware of the internal happenings that go on. Those happenings are not actually made known to the public so the contents of this blog post is just to share my experience and I'm certain I didn't put Utopian platform in a bad place because I said several times on this post that the Utopian platform is really great.
Btw it is weird that you answered a review question that I gathered information from other sources when I was just sharing my own experience and not hear says or content gotten off the internet. Also this is a contrast of your previous review that said I offered valuable insights about the project. It's quite confusing how that changes now.
Yes! It is your review, but if there are contradictions, false or negative information's within the post, they need to be clarified. Your review on this part does not convey accurate info about Utopian and I cannot choose that answer.
We are improving the questionnaire and more answers will be included. Thank you!
Oh okay. Thanks for clarifying.
Thank you for your review, @tykee! Keep up the good work!