Actually, I'm pointing to something that's exactly in our control, but I'm not comparing apples to bananas.

Facebook has a complex structure behind it, but the principle of it was not to bring people showing that they could make money from it. When you use Facebook to make money, you have the same problem that we have in Steemit. In this case we come up with a very interesting question, how many people are on Facebook to make money? Analyzing this process, we can use the two groups of people on the same level, those who are on Facebook in search of money and those who are on Steemit for the same reason.

Now if we compare both sites, compare yes to the first two years, when Facebook had less than 10 million users for a system that I speak again, was not ideal as the financial return, as is explained here in Steemit.

Account creation is slow because you need to pay to have an account. If you want an account for free, you have to wait. In this case I ask, when did Facebook ask you for money to create an account? Is the business model wrong? I think not, if we did not have a great time to create a new account, we would have several fake accounts, and unlike Facebook, we can not ban them as this is not possible in Steemit and also goes against your goal Is not it?

Finally, Steem really failed ... Failed for lack of documentation showing how easy it was for you to access a platform with no ideological question that will erase your account because it simply goes against what your CEOs think. Now, why does not this exist? Blame the whales and the creator of the platform, or blame us as users that we show Steem as a way to post and earn money instead of showing that here we have a much greater amount of freedom?

If someone failed, it was not the others, they were ourselves, too. We have a great deal of guilt.