You can't censor "bad" things and not censor "good" things. Cos good and bad is arbitrary. In some cultures a wooman without hijab on photo considered worse than a chield porn (Mohammed has 12 y.o. wife). Do you think we must delete all womans with a bare hares?
We know what we like and what we don't. But we don't know what bad and good, cos no such things as objectively good and bad exists. So if you censoring something (anything), you just forcefully shutting up those who a weaker than you are. Censorship is a tool of tyranny.
To kill a man is bad.
But you definetly must be allowed to say that you gonna kill a man or that you done it already. This info must not be censored. It may save that man!
And with a CP it's totally the same. It's bad to rape childrens (or any human being).
But if it's done somewhere it's good to get a world know that it's been done. So CP must be spreaded maximally if you really whant to save kids. Only reason to censor CP is if you a molester!
Remember pizzagate? Child rapists are in our government. And they give us this censorship.
It may be good to control physical aggression by force, but it's NEWER good to censor information by force. Or you will be brainwashed by touse who do it to think that CP, piracy or woman with a bare heads, or gays, or anything else are "objectively bad".
It's good to get the word out that it's done? So more people follow the example? You know the media pushes these things right? When one psychopath sees that another person has shot a bunch of people, they can (not always, but sometimes) feel inspired to follow along. Because obviously some people 'agree' with them.
The uncensored internet (darknet) has whole rings of pedophiles who share this content. Have you ever used the darknet? You'd love it, it's totally uncensored. When this shit is shown, it creates more, hell, it even creates a market for it. Spreading it does not make it better or make more people aware, it creates a bigger problem.
It IS GOOD to censor some things. I can't believe how narrow-minded you are. I'm done with this argument.
Child porn is okay (because it's not objectively right or wrong, because nothing is). Therefore, if it isn't right or wrong it must be okay. So, that means for you, ruining a child's life (who has absolutely no control over this situation) is okay. It shouldn't be censored! After all, that's tyranny. Jeez. I'm happy most people don't think like you.
How could we keep off illegal material?
Why should we?
There definitely is. The child porn and piracy on Steemit? Should we just keep it and let it be visible to all?
There should also be a way to permanently delete posts and get them off the platform.
No. If someone can delete what he don't like it's a censorship.
So Child Porn and pirated content shouldn't be censored and should be able to be seen by all? Gotcha.
You can't censor "bad" things and not censor "good" things. Cos good and bad is arbitrary. In some cultures a wooman without hijab on photo considered worse than a chield porn (Mohammed has 12 y.o. wife). Do you think we must delete all womans with a bare hares?
We know what we like and what we don't. But we don't know what bad and good, cos no such things as objectively good and bad exists. So if you censoring something (anything), you just forcefully shutting up those who a weaker than you are. Censorship is a tool of tyranny.
We will have to agree to disagree then. Some things are just inheritanly wrong (or they very well should be).
If we use your thinking, then I can justify anything 'oh, I killed him because he stepped on my toe'. It's not objectively bad....
To kill a man is bad.
But you definetly must be allowed to say that you gonna kill a man or that you done it already. This info must not be censored. It may save that man!
And with a CP it's totally the same. It's bad to rape childrens (or any human being).
But if it's done somewhere it's good to get a world know that it's been done. So CP must be spreaded maximally if you really whant to save kids. Only reason to censor CP is if you a molester!
Remember pizzagate? Child rapists are in our government. And they give us this censorship.
It may be good to control physical aggression by force, but it's NEWER good to censor information by force. Or you will be brainwashed by touse who do it to think that CP, piracy or woman with a bare heads, or gays, or anything else are "objectively bad".
It's good to get the word out that it's done? So more people follow the example? You know the media pushes these things right? When one psychopath sees that another person has shot a bunch of people, they can (not always, but sometimes) feel inspired to follow along. Because obviously some people 'agree' with them.
The uncensored internet (darknet) has whole rings of pedophiles who share this content. Have you ever used the darknet? You'd love it, it's totally uncensored. When this shit is shown, it creates more, hell, it even creates a market for it. Spreading it does not make it better or make more people aware, it creates a bigger problem.
It IS GOOD to censor some things. I can't believe how narrow-minded you are. I'm done with this argument.
Okay, let me get this right.
Child porn is okay (because it's not objectively right or wrong, because nothing is). Therefore, if it isn't right or wrong it must be okay. So, that means for you, ruining a child's life (who has absolutely no control over this situation) is okay. It shouldn't be censored! After all, that's tyranny. Jeez. I'm happy most people don't think like you.