Thank you for your inputs. I will take them seriously.
People like you , @paulag and especially @crokkon are the reason i still contribute to analysis. The 'rejections' have really improved me and made me to up my game.
Can i edit the post to address the issues you raised?
I wouldn't suggest editing this post because honestly, the foundation or core question is lacking. The analysis doesn't answer anything new (in my opinion).
What I would suggest thought is to start from your core questions. Think of questions that have not yet been answered and the community will find interesting. A question that's important for you to find as well.
Some questions you may want answered - Is it a new analysis? Was it already covered by other authors? If it's already covered by others, then there's a high possibility that your analysis can be considered a duplicate.