Translation report part 16: Steem White Paper (Genesis)
(Immagine made by @pab.ink)
This post is published in relation to the @utopian-io & @davinci.polyglot translation project, by a selected Translator for the Italian language
PROJECT DETAILS
The project that I have taken charge of is Steem White Paper (Genesis). Genesi means that it is the first draft. This document has great value, even if there is a more recent and updated version; given that without a comprehension of the basis of the past it is difficult to have a clear vision of the future. This project is very important and has unlimited possibilities that come up after you take a read of it. Thanks to my role of translator I have the great opportunity of comprehend always better its values and its complexity. The sector of the blockchain is in rapid expansion and Steem is an optimal example of one of its many applications that can be aimed at. The fusion between social media and cryptocurrencies really has optimal expectations for the future.
Check out the whole project on Github
CONTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS
- Translation Overview:
This is my sixteenth work as a translator for the Steem White Paper (Genesis) project. With this translation I completed about 77% of the project assigned to me. I'm coming to the end of this job, and I've gained a lot of new knowledge about Steem. The motivations that drive me to translate are my belief in the concept of open source. My work remains unchanged and consists in translating from Italian to English. In these thousands words we have come across different topics: scalability, renting with timesharing and buying, all to compare it to Steem. Below I propose a brief extract of this comparison.
When someone owns a house they expect the right to use the house for free. If a group of people buy a house together then each can expect the right to use the house proportional to their percentage ownership in the house. A fee based blockchain is like renting the house from its owners, whereas rate limiting is like a timeshare among owners.
If a house is owned by multiple people then those individuals must decide how they wish to timeshare the house. Someone who owns 50% of the house but only uses it one weekend per year might expect to be paid by the individuals who take their unused time. This is the mindset of a fee based system.
LANGUAGES
Source language: English
Target language: Italian
To check my previous experiences as a translator you can consult my application
WORD COUNT
Words Translated: 1050
PROOF OF AUTHORSHIP
You can lookup Crowdin project on the following link, as well as the summary of my activities
Note:
Inspiring work from you. Translation as it is really difficult. Thanks a lot for sharing.
Hi @filippocrypto!
Thank you for your sixteenth contribution.
the text translated is good and accurate; no mistakes found in this work
the post is very good written, formatted and well discussed
keep up the good work, you're pretty close finishing this project!
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Chat with us on Discord
Hey @filippocrypto
Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!
Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.
Vote for Utopian Witness!