You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Weekly overview of the Graphics category - Week 45, 2018
Would you say that it is a good thing that the average score does not pass the level of score 70? Also, considering that some of the designers write 2 or 3 posts with their creation per week, do you see any improvement and variety of the posts?
It's kinda hard to answer that question, in my opinion score distribution is working well but by looking at the reviews, almost all contributions loosing points from the first and the last question. I actually want to include that information into these series as well. https://review.utopian.io/
Contributions are mostly a result of contributor's own work, they mostly used in the project and many of them provides the necessary files (I can tell review feedbacks worked best on this.)
The difference between scores comes from the presentation and the technical quality. Some of the contributors provides their bests on both presentation and the design itself. So they increase the average. However other parties just use their templates as their presentations, forget to change texts, forget the change images or else which ends up with way lower scores.
And there is the hardest part, even if a contributor gets best answers for the questions except first and the last one they can only hit to ~70.
Many contributions only includes one design, which cause a lost of 7 points.
And many of them targets an easy project like either so new ones, or without any contributors or without a good commit history this makes the overall value of the contribution low. And this question also takes about 17 to 25 points away.
For the improvement, of course there are some contributors improved their styles, their presentations, their communication with the projects etc. But still there are some contributors ignoring all the feedbacks, making the same mistakes over and over again.