You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit/Steem: Reputation Voting Analysis
This makes sense to me. The accounts with the highest rep scores have the largest accounts. They can make reasonable money curating and not have to author to get anything in return. If I could make a few grand curating per week, I know I'd be less interested in writing content. But that's just me. :-) Thanks for the post! Very interesting work!
Thanks Brett!
That one was a slog!
I think the main thing is that it shows that self-voting is spread across the board, it's not just the Whales, and so their should be no complaints.
Thanks for the hard slog on this @abh12345. Not sure I agree with your comment on this though, as surely newbies are following the examples set by the whales! I could be wrong though and maybe they are just doing what comes natural 🙊. Thank you again for helping us to understand the inner workings, and I guess the conclusions we draw from the stats can be subjective.
I trust you enjoyed your beverage 🍻.
Hi, and yes thanks!
Indeed the written analysis and conclusions are down to personal opinion. And it's easy to tar Reps in this case, with the same brush.
I suppose it depends which whales you follow, they aren't all rotten, I think!
Cheers!
Ah yes for sure! I should have said "some whales". I used to big a brush! Thanks for your reply.
Yeah same here!! =)